Simulation of Ship-Track versus Satellite-Sensor Differences in Oceanic Precipitation Using an Island-Based Radar

The point-to-area problem strongly complicates the validation of satellite-based precipitation estimates, using surface-based point measurements. We simulate the limited spatial representation of light-to-moderate oceanic precipitation rates along ship tracks with respect to areal passive microwave satellite estimates using data from a subtropical island-based radar. The radar data serves to estimate the discrepancy between point-like and areal precipitation measurements. From the spatial discrepancy, two statistical adjustments are derived so that along-track precipitation ship data better represent areal precipitation estimates from satellite sensors. The first statistical adjustment uses the average duration of a precipitation event as seen along a ship track, and the second adjustment uses the median-normalized along-track precipitation rate. Both statistical adjustments combined reduce the root mean squared error by 0.24 mm h − 1 (55%) compared to the unadjusted average track of 60 radar pixels in length corresponding to a typical ship speed of 24–34 km h − 1 depending on track orientation. Beyond along-track averaging, the statistical adjustments represent an important step towards a more accurate validation of precipitation derived from passive microwave satellite sensors using point-like along-track surface precipitation reference data.

[1]  Ali Behrangi,et al.  On the quantification of oceanic rainfall using spaceborne sensors , 2012 .

[2]  Viviana Maggioni,et al.  A Review of Merged High-Resolution Satellite Precipitation Product Accuracy during the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) Era , 2016 .

[3]  Bjorn Stevens,et al.  Evaluating light rain from satellite- and ground-based remote sensing data over the subtropical North Atlantic , 2015 .

[4]  D. Entekhabi,et al.  Characterization of precipitation product errors across the United States using multiplicative triple collocation , 2015 .

[5]  Marco Petracca,et al.  On the uncertainties in validating satellite instantaneous rainfall estimates with raingauge operational network , 2014 .

[6]  C. Klepp.  The oceanic shipboard precipitation measurement network for surface validation — OceanRAIN , 2014 .

[7]  G. König‐Langlo,et al.  HOAPS and ERA-Interim precipitation over the sea: validation against shipboard in situ measurements , 2016 .

[8]  S. Bakan,et al.  Hamburg Ocean Atmosphere Parameters and Fluxes from Satellite Data - HOAPS 3.2 - Monthly Means / 6-Hourly Composites , 2012 .

[9]  P. Fiener,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of spatial interpolation schemes for daily rainfall in data scarce regions , 2012 .

[10]  Jothiram Vivekanandan,et al.  S-Pol: NCAR's polarimetric Doppler research radar , 2000, IGARSS 2000. IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Taking the Pulse of the Planet: The Role of Remote Sensing in Managing the Environment. Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37120).

[11]  B. Stevens,et al.  On the seasonal and synoptic time scale variability of the North Atlantic trades and its low-level clouds , 2015 .

[12]  K. Bumke.  Validation of ERA-Interim Precipitation Estimates over the Baltic Sea , 2016 .

[13]  W. Krajewski,et al.  On the estimation of radar rainfall error variance , 1999 .

[14]  Axel Andersson,et al.  The Hamburg Ocean Atmosphere Parameters and Fluxes from Satellite Data – HOAPS-3 , 2010 .

[15]  W. Petersen,et al.  Global precipitation measurement: Methods, datasets and applications , 2012 .

[16]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  A method for filtering out raingauge representativeness errors from the verification distributions of radar and raingauge rainfall , 2004 .

[17]  E. Anagnostou,et al.  Precipitation: Measurement, remote sensing, climatology and modeling , 2009 .

[18]  D. Marks,et al.  A comparison of geostatistical procedures for spatial analysis of precipitation in mountainous terrain , 1992 .

[19]  A. Stoffelen.  Toward the true near-surface wind speed: Error modeling and calibration using triple collocation , 1998 .

[20]  E. S. Epstein.  POINT AND AREA PRECIPITATION PROBABILITIES1,,2 , 1966 .

[21]  S. Bakan,et al.  Point-to-area validation of passive microwave satellite precipitation with shipboard disdrometers , 2017 .

[22]  C. Knight,et al.  Early Radar Echoes from Small, Warm Cumulus: Bragg and Hydrometeor Scattering , 1998 .

[23]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  Rain in Shallow Cumulus Over the Ocean: The RICO Campaign , 2007 .

[24]  Chris Kidd,et al.  Global Precipitation Measurement , 2008 .

[25]  A. P. Siebesma,et al.  The environment of precipitating shallow cumulus convection , 2009 .

[26]  R. Rauber,et al.  Precipitation Characteristics of Trade Wind Clouds during RICO Derived from Radar, Satellite, and Aircraft Measurements , 2006 .