From ATOM to GradiATOM: Cortical gradients support time and space processing as revealed by a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies

According to the ATOM (A Theory Of Magnitude), formulated by Walsh more than fifteen years ago, there is a general system of magnitude in the brain that comprises regions, such as the parietal cortex, shared by space, time and other magnitudes (Walsh, 2003). The present meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies used the Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) method in order to determine the set of regions commonly activated in space and time processing and to establish the neural activations specific to each magnitude domain. Following PRISMA guidelines, we included in the analysis a total of 112 and 114 experiments, exploring space and time processing, respectively. We clearly identified the presence of a system of brain regions commonly recruited in both space and time and that includes: bilateral insula, the pre-supplementary motor area (SMA), the right frontal operculum and the intraparietal sulci. These regions might be the best candidates to form the core magnitude neural system. Surprisingly, along each of these regions but the insula, ALE values progressed in a cortical gradient from time to space. The SMA exhibited an anterior-posterior gradient, with space activating more-anterior regions (i.e., pre-SMA) and time activating more-posterior regions (i.e., SMA-proper). Frontal and parietal regions showed a dorsal-ventral gradient: space is mediated by dorsal frontal and parietal regions, and time recruits ventral frontal and parietal regions. Our study supports but also expands the ATOM theory. Therefore, we here re-named it the ‘GradiATOM’ theory (Gradient Theory of Magnitude), proposing that gradient organization can facilitate the transformations and integrations of magnitude representations by allowing space- and time-related neural populations to interact with each other over minimal distances.

[1]  Wayne E. Mackey,et al.  Visual field map clusters in human frontoparietal cortex , 2016, bioRxiv.

[2]  Jay Pratt,et al.  Time flies like an arrow: Space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  T. Wüstenberg,et al.  Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  Jeffrey W. Cooney,et al.  Hierarchical cognitive control deficits following damage to the human frontal lobe , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Motor Area Activity During Mental Rotation Studied by Time-Resolved Single-Trial fMRI , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  S. Kastner,et al.  Mechanisms of Spatial Attention Control in Frontal and Parietal Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Situating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Franck Vidal,et al.  Time processing reflected by EEG surface Laplacians , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Interaction of Numerosity and Time in Prefrontal and Parietal Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Jinglong Wu,et al.  An fMRI Study of the Neural Systems Involved in Visually Cued Auditory Top-Down Spatial and Temporal Attention , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  Ilaria Mazzonetto,et al.  Bayesian modeling of temporal expectations in the human brain , 2019, NeuroImage.

[13]  M. Corbetta,et al.  The Reorienting System of the Human Brain: From Environment to Theory of Mind , 2008, Neuron.

[14]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Supplementary Information for Natural Speech Reveals the Semantic Maps That Tile Human Cerebral Cortex , 2022 .

[15]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Minimizing within‐experiment and within‐group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta‐analyses , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Martina Poletti,et al.  Dependence of fixational saccades on the visual task and image fading conditions , 2010 .

[17]  Alice Teghil,et al.  Neural substrates of internally-based and externally-cued timing: An activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis of fMRI studies , 2019, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[18]  L. Boroditsky,et al.  Time in the mind: Using space to think about time , 2008, Cognition.

[19]  Julia M. Huntenburg,et al.  Large-Scale Gradients in Human Cortical Organization , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  V. Walsh,et al.  The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Functional Neuroanatomy of Single-Word Reading: Method and Validation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[22]  F. Frassinetti,et al.  Time and spatial attention: Effects of prism adaptation on temporal deficits in brain damaged patients , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Hemispatial Neglect Shows That “Before” Is “Left” , 2016, Neural plasticity.

[24]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Behavior, sensitivity, and power of activation likelihood estimation characterized by massive empirical simulation , 2016, NeuroImage.

[25]  A. Nobre,et al.  Dissociating explicit timing from temporal expectation with fMRI , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[26]  C. Semenza,et al.  Cultural modulations of space–time compatibility effects , 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  F. K. Schumacher,et al.  Functionally dissociating ventro-dorsal components within the rostro-caudal hierarchical organization of the human prefrontal cortex , 2019, NeuroImage.

[28]  Boris C. Bernhardt,et al.  Gradients of structure–function tethering across neocortex , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Influence of Motivation on Control Hierarchy in the Human Frontal Cortex , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  Michael J. Martinez,et al.  Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM‐152 brain template , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[31]  M. Catani,et al.  A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  K. Zilles,et al.  Coordinate‐based activation likelihood estimation meta‐analysis of neuroimaging data: A random‐effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[33]  Angela M. Uecker,et al.  ALE meta‐analysis: Controlling the false discovery rate and performing statistical contrasts , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[34]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Vincent Walsh A theory of magnitude: common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Julio Santiago,et al.  Flexible Conceptual Projection of Time Onto Spatial Frames of Reference , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[37]  S. Yantis,et al.  Spatially selective representations of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional priority in human occipital, parietal, and frontal cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  Martin I. Sereno,et al.  Spatial maps in frontal and prefrontal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[39]  D. Stuss,et al.  How time modulates spatial responses , 2011, Cortex.

[40]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Listening to musical rhythms recruits motor regions of the brain. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  S. Wise,et al.  Context-Dependent Duration Signals in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Franco Cauda,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Time: A Meta-analysis of Neuroimaging Studies , 2019, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  M. Zorzi,et al.  When time is space: Evidence for a mental time line , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[44]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  The heterogeneity of the left dorsal premotor cortex evidenced by multimodal connectivity-based parcellation and functional characterization , 2017, NeuroImage.

[45]  Thomas Karlsson,et al.  Magnitude Processing in the Brain: An fMRI Study of Time, Space, and Numerosity as a Shared Cortical System , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[46]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Ten simple rules for neuroimaging meta-analysis , 2018, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[47]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Imaging-based parcellations of the human brain , 2018, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[48]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans , 2010, Cognition.

[49]  Sonja A. Kotz,et al.  Functional dissociation of pre-SMA and SMA-proper in temporal processing , 2012, NeuroImage.

[50]  Michael C. Corballis,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of Mental Rotation , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  S. Petersen,et al.  A dual-networks architecture of top-down control , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[52]  Laura E. Suárez,et al.  Gradients of structure–function tethering across neocortex , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[53]  Olaf Blanke,et al.  Brain system for mental orientation in space, time, and person , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Human auditory event-related potentials predict duration judgments , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[55]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Topographical disorientation: a synthesis and taxonomy. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  A. Nobre,et al.  Prioritizing Information during Working Memory: Beyond Sustained Internal Attention , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  F. Frassinetti,et al.  Prismatic adaptation effects on spatial representation of time in neglect patients , 2013, Cortex.

[58]  Remco J. Renken,et al.  Cerebral representations of space and time , 2009, NeuroImage.

[59]  A. Sack,et al.  The cross-functional role of frontoparietal regions in cognition: internal attention as the overarching mechanism , 2014, Progress in Neurobiology.

[60]  Masami Ishihara,et al.  Horizontal spatial representations of time: Evidence for the STEARC effect , 2008, Cortex.

[61]  Giorgia Cona,et al.  Where is the “where” in the brain? A meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies on spatial cognition , 2019, Human brain mapping.

[62]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Comparison of the disparity between Talairach and MNI coordinates in functional neuroimaging data: Validation of the Lancaster transform , 2010, NeuroImage.

[63]  Martin P. Paulus,et al.  Accumulation of neural activity in the posterior insula encodes the passage of time , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited , 2012, NeuroImage.

[65]  J. Fuster Upper processing stages of the perception–action cycle , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  Ryota Kanai,et al.  Chronotopic maps in human supplementary motor area , 2019, PLoS biology.

[67]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Neural circuits of hierarchical visuo-spatial sequence processing , 2009, Brain Research.

[68]  Masamichi J. Hayashi,et al.  Time Adaptation Shows Duration Selectivity in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2015, PLoS biology.

[69]  Gian Domenico Iannetti,et al.  An Action Field Theory of Peripersonal Space , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[70]  Dieter Kleinböhl,et al.  A "view from nowhen" on time perception experiments. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[71]  R. Goebel,et al.  Tracking the Mind's Image in the Brain I Time-Resolved fMRI during Visuospatial Mental Imagery , 2002, Neuron.

[72]  M Concetta Morrone,et al.  Saccadic eye movements cause compression of time as well as space , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[73]  Sylvie Droit-Volet,et al.  SMA Selectively Codes the Active Accumulation of Temporal, Not Spatial, Magnitude , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[74]  C. Semenza,et al.  Supplementary motor area as key structure for domain-general sequence processing: A unified account , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[75]  Clayton E. Curtis,et al.  Maps of space in human frontoparietal cortex , 2013, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[76]  Sheng He,et al.  Larger stimuli are judged to last longer. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[77]  Thomas Wolbers,et al.  Space, time, and numbers in the right posterior parietal cortex: Differences between response code associations and congruency effects , 2016, NeuroImage.

[78]  Valérie Dormal,et al.  A common right fronto‐parietal network for numerosity and duration processing: An fMRI study , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[79]  Aldo Genovesio,et al.  Encoding Goals but Not Abstract Magnitude in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex , 2012, Neuron.

[80]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[81]  Daniel Casasanto,et al.  Space and Time in the Child's Mind: Evidence for a Cross-Dimensional Asymmetry , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[82]  Jacob M. Paul,et al.  A Network of Topographic Maps in Human Association Cortex Hierarchically Transforms Visual Timing-Selective Responses , 2020, Current Biology.

[83]  Giacomo Koch,et al.  Spatial–temporal interactions in the human brain , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[84]  J. Lurito,et al.  Neural circuitry underlying perception of duration depends on language experience , 2002, Brain and Language.

[85]  Martin Wiener,et al.  Multiple Mechanisms for Temporal Processing , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[86]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[87]  Clayton E. Curtis,et al.  Visual field map clusters in human frontoparietal cortex , 2016 .

[88]  S. Dumoulin,et al.  A network of topographic numerosity maps in human association cortex , 2016, Nature Human Behaviour.

[89]  Franck Vidal,et al.  The supplementary motor area in motor and sensory timing: evidence from slow brain potential changes , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[90]  R. Seurinck,et al.  Does egocentric mental rotation elicit sex differences? , 2004, NeuroImage.

[91]  R. Weiner,et al.  Neuropsychological Aspects Of Disorientation , 1987, Cortex.

[92]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Is the rostro-caudal axis of the frontal lobe hierarchical? , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[93]  M. Tabak,et al.  On the localization of water-soluble porphyrins in micellar systems evaluated by static and time-resolved frequency-domain fluorescence techniques. , 2008, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[94]  Laurence Casini,et al.  The SMAs: Neural Substrate of the Temporal Accumulator? , 2011, Front. Integr. Neurosci..

[95]  Louise Connell,et al.  Space–time interdependence: Evidence against asymmetric mapping between time and space , 2015, Cognition.

[96]  Martin Wiener,et al.  The image of time: A voxel-wise meta-analysis , 2010, NeuroImage.