Effects of Tutoring in Phonological and Early Reading Skills on Students at Risk for Reading Disabilities

This study examined the effectiveness of nonprofessional tutors in a phonologically based reading treatment similar to those in which successful reading outcomes have been demonstrated. Participants were 23 first graders at risk for learning disability who received intensive one-to-one tutoring from noncertified tutors for 30 minutes, 4 days a week, for one school year. Tutoring included instruction in phonological skills, letter-sound correspondence, explicit decoding, rime analysis, writing, spelling, and reading phonetically controlled text. At year end, tutored students significantly outperformed untutored control students on measures of reading, spelling, and decoding. Effect sizes ranged from .42 to 1.24. Treatment effects diminished at follow-up at the end of second grade, although tutored students continued to significantly outperform untutored students in decoding and spelling. Findings suggest that phonologically based reading instruction for first graders at risk for learning disability can be delivered by nonteacher tutors. Our discussion addresses the character of reading outcomes associated with tutoring, individual differences in response to treatment, and the infrastructure required for nonprofessional tutoring programs.

[1]  Phillip L. Harris,et al.  A Field Test of Programed and Directed Tutoring , 1968 .

[2]  Connie Juel,et al.  The Influence of Basal Readers on First Grade Reading. , 1985 .

[3]  Patricia F. Vadasy,et al.  Tutoring First-Grade Struggling Readers in Phonological Reading Skills , 2000 .

[4]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  The Effectiveness of One-to-One Tutoring by Community Tutors for at-Risk Beginning Readers , 1997 .

[5]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Beginning To Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. , 1991 .

[6]  Edward R. Sipay,et al.  Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers : Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific Reading disability , 1996 .

[7]  V. Berninger.  Preventing Reading Disabilities by Assessing and Remediating Phonemic Skills. , 1987 .

[8]  Lynette Bradley,et al.  Rhyme and reason in reading and spelling , 1985 .

[9]  Catherine A. Rosemary,et al.  At-Risk Readers and Community Volunteers: A 3-Year Perspective , 1997, Components of Effective Reading Intervention.

[10]  Catherine A. Rosemary,et al.  A community volunteer tutorial that works , 1996 .

[11]  Robert E. Slavin,et al.  Success for All: First-Year Outcomes of a Comprehensive Plan for Reforming Urban Education , 1990 .

[12]  L. Ehri,et al.  Movement into Reading: Is the First Stage of Printed Word Learning Visual or Phonetic?. , 1985 .

[13]  Jack M. Fletcher,et al.  Early Interventions for Children With Reading Problems: Study Designs and Preliminary Findings , 1997 .

[14]  V. Berninger.  Multiple Orthographic Codes: Key to Alternative Instructional Methodologies for Developing the Orthographic-Phonological Connections Underlying Word Identification. , 1990 .

[15]  K. Stanovich.  Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. , 1986 .

[16]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF AUTOMATICITY FOR DEVELOPING EXPERTISE IN READING , 1997 .

[17]  S. Deno,et al.  Curriculum-Based Measurement: The Emerging Alternative , 1985, Exceptional children.

[18]  Barbara A. Wasik,et al.  Success for All: Longitudinal Effects of a Restructuring Program for Inner-City Elementary Schools , 1993 .

[19]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Preventive and Remedial Interventions for Children with Severe Reading Disabilities , 1997 .

[20]  G. McCloskey.  Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised , 1987 .

[21]  Linda S. Siegel,et al.  Teaching Phonological Processing Skills in Early Literacy: A Developmental Approach , 1997 .

[22]  D. Share.  Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition , 1995, Cognition.

[23]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Prevention and Remediation of Severe Reading Disabilities: Keeping the End in Mind , 1997, Components of Effective Reading Intervention.

[24]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Comparing Instructional Models for the Literacy Education of High-Risk First Graders , 1994 .

[25]  Michael A. Wallach,et al.  Teaching all children to read , 1976 .

[26]  Hallie Kay Yopp,et al.  The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests. , 1988 .

[27]  T. Shanahan,et al.  Reading recovery: An independent evaluation of the effects of an early instructional intervention for at-risk learners. , 1995 .

[28]  Connie Juel,et al.  What Makes Literacy Tutoring Effective , 1996 .

[29]  Barbara A. Wasik,et al.  Preventing Early Reading Failure with One-to-One Tutoring: A Review of Five Programs. , 1993 .

[30]  U. Goswami,et al.  Phonological Skills and Learning to Read , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Judith A. Bowey,et al.  Socioeconomic Status Differences in Preschool Phonological Sensitivity and First-Grade Reading Achievement. , 1995 .

[32]  Nancy Mather,et al.  Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery-Revised: Recommendations and Reports , 1992 .

[33]  B. Wasik.  Volunteer Tutoring Programs in Reading: A Review , 1998 .

[34]  William E. Tunmer,et al.  Phonological Processing Skills and the Reading Recovery Program. , 1993 .

[35]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Off Track: When Poor Readers Become ""Learning Disabled"" , 1996 .

[36]  M. Lovett.  Treating the Core Deficits of Developmental Dyslexia: Evidence of Transfer of Learning after Phonologically- and Strategy-Based Reading Training Programs. , 1994 .

[37]  H. Catts,et al.  The relationship between speech-language impairments and reading disabilities. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[38]  Ruth Fielding-Barnsley,et al.  Explicit Instruction in Decoding Benefits Children High in Phonemic Awareness and Alphabet Knowledge , 1997 .

[39]  R. Venezky.  The Structure of English Orthography , 1965 .

[40]  R. Abbott,et al.  Early intervention for spelling problems: Teaching functional spelling units of varying size with a multiple-connections framework. , 1998 .

[41]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Reading Education: Foundations for a Literate America , 1986 .

[42]  C. Juel.  Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. , 1988 .

[43]  Richard K. Olson,et al.  Computer-Based Remedial Training in Phoneme Awareness and Phonological Decoding: Effects on the Posttraining Development of Word Recognition , 1997, Components of Effective Reading Intervention.

[44]  G. Reid Lyon,et al.  Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities : new views on measurement issues , 1994 .

[45]  Linnea C. Ehri,et al.  Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. , 1992 .

[46]  P. Vadasy.  Community-Based Early Reading Intervention for At-Risk First Graders. , 1997 .

[47]  Rollanda E. O'Connor,et al.  Transfer among Phonological Tasks in Kindergarten: Essential Instructional Content. , 1995 .

[48]  Marie M. Clay,et al.  The early detection of reading difficulties , 1981 .

[49]  E. Dolch.  A manual for remedial reading , 1939 .

[50]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Longitudinal Studies of Phonological Processing and Reading , 1994, Journal of learning disabilities.

[51]  Peter J. Hatcher,et al.  Ameliorating Early Reading Failure by Integrating the Teaching of Reading and Phonological Skills: The Phonological Linkage Hypothesis , 1994 .