Mixture loss coefficient of safety valves used in nuclear plants

Abstract Theoretical and experimental investigations on the loss coefficient of gas–liquid mixture across safety relief valves have been carried out. Experiments were performed for three different types of safety valves and under different flow conditions. Using the Darcy equation and based on the presented experimental results, a new empirical correlation has been developed to calculate the loss coefficient and hence pressure loss. By consideration of flow contraction, high viscous fluids, Reynolds number and safety valve geometry, the model includes therefore the relevant primary influencing parameters. The reproductive accuracy of the proposed model and the statistical comparison, based on about 2000 measured data in the literature, demonstrated that the proposed model is the best overall agreement with the data. The standard deviation of the data is less than 27%. The model fits the data well and is sufficiently accurate for engineering purposes. The reported results of the tested safety relief valve are very important to improve the practical and safety design of the nuclear plants.

[1]  Gelu N. Gavrila,et al.  Best performance characteristic of pressure relief valves and the amount of lost product , 1991 .

[2]  Lutz Friedel,et al.  Prediction of the maximum full lift safety valve two-phase flow capacity , 1998 .

[3]  J. P. Holman,et al.  Experimental methods for engineers , 1971 .

[4]  J. Chowdhury,et al.  Estimate two-phase flow in safety devices , 1991 .

[5]  Gian Piero Celata,et al.  Two-phase flow through pressure safety valves. Experimental investigation and model prediction , 2005 .

[6]  L. Friedel,et al.  Two-phase pressure drop across sudden contractions in duct areas , 1997 .

[7]  G. Ding,et al.  Experimental study of throttling of carbon dioxide refrigerant to atmospheric pressure , 2007 .

[8]  Ron Darby,et al.  On two-phase frozen and flashing flows in safety relief valuesRecommended calculation method and the proper use of the discharge coefficient , 2004 .

[9]  Ron Darby,et al.  On two-phase frozen and flashing flows in safety relief values , 2004 .

[10]  Lutz Friedel,et al.  Prediction of Single‐ and Two‐Phase Flow Contraction through a Sharp‐Edged Short Orifice , 1999 .

[11]  Joseph C. Leung,et al.  A theory on the discharge coefficient for safety relief valve , 2004 .

[12]  M. Q. Al-Odat,et al.  Two-phase flow resistance in flexible metal hoses , 2008 .

[13]  Lutz Friedel,et al.  Safety valve sizing according to EN ISO 4126-4 and industrial practice in case of highly viscous liquid duty , 2006 .

[14]  J. Schmidt.  Sizing of nozzles, venturis, orifices, control and safety valves for initially sub-cooled gas/liquid two-phase flow – The HNE-DS method , 2007 .

[15]  Api Standard.  Sizing, Selection, and Installation of Pressure-relieving Devices in Refineries , 2008 .

[16]  B. Shannak,et al.  Frictional pressure drop of gas liquid two-phase flow in pipes , 2008 .

[17]  M. Al-Shannag,et al.  Gas-liquid pressure drop in vertical internally wavy 90° bend , 2009 .

[18]  Ralf Diener,et al.  Sizing of throttling device for gas/liquid two‐phase flow part 1: Safety valves , 2004 .

[19]  Marc Hellemans.  Sizing and Selection , 2010 .

[20]  R. J. Moffat,et al.  Contributions to the Theory of Single-Sample Uncertainty Analysis , 1982 .

[21]  Helmut G. Knoedler.  A systems engineered approach towards improved safety and performance of valves , 1992 .