Population evolution on a multiplicative single-peak fitness landscape.

A theory for evolution of either gene sequences or molecular sequences must take into account that a population consists of a finite number of individuals with related sequences. Such a population will not behave in the deterministic way expected for an infinite population, nor will it behave as in adaptive walk models, where the whole of the population is represented by a single sequence. Here we study a model for evolution of population in a fitness landscape with a single fitness peak. This landscape is simple enough for finite size population effects to be studied in detail. Each of the N individuals in the population is represented by a sequence of L genes which may either be advantageous or disadvantageous. The fitness of an individual with k disadvantageous genes is Wk = (1-s)k, where s determines the strength of selection. In the limit L-->infinity, the model reduces to the problem of Muller's Ratchet: the population moves away from the fitness peak at a constant rate due to the accumulation of disadvantageous mutations. For finite length sequences, a population placed initially at the fitness peak will evolve away from the peak until a balance is reached between mutation and selection. From then on the population will wander through a spherical shell in sequence space at a constant mean Hamming distance from the optimum sequence. We give an approximate theory for the way depends on N, L, s, and the mutation rate u. This is found to agree well with numerical simulation. Selection is less effective on small populations, so increases as N decreases. Our simulations also show that the mean overlap between gene sequences separated by a time of t generations is of the form Q(t) = Q infinity + (Q0-Q infinity)exp(-2ut), which means that the rate of evolution within the spherical shell is independent of the selection strength. We give a simplified model which can be solved exactly for which Q(t) has precisely this form. We then consider the limit L-->infinity keeping U = uL constant. We suppose that each mutation may be favourable with probability p, or unfavourable with probability 1-p. We show that for p less than a critical value pc, the population decreases in fitness for all values of U, whereas for pc < p < 1/2, the population increases in fitness for small U and decreases in fitness for large U. In this case there is an optimum non-zero value of U at which the fitness increases most rapidly, and natural selection will favour species with non-zero mutation rates.

[1]  P. Higgs,et al.  The accumulation of mutations in asexual populations and the structure of genealogical trees in the presence of selection , 1995 .

[2]  G. Wagner,et al.  What is the difference between models of error thresholds and Muller's ratchet? , 1993 .

[3]  Weinberger,et al.  RNA folding and combinatory landscapes. , 1993, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[4]  G. Wagner,et al.  QUANTITATIVE VARIATION IN FINITE PARTHENOGENETIC POPULATIONS: WHAT STOPS MULLER'S RATCHET IN THE ABSENCE OF RECOMBINATION? , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[5]  B. Derrida,et al.  Evolution in a flat fitness landscape , 1991 .

[6]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[7]  M. Kimura,et al.  The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness. , 1966, Genetics.

[8]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Mutation accumulation in finite outbreeding and inbreeding populations , 1993 .

[9]  Peter F. Stadler,et al.  Error Thresholds on Correlated Fitness Landscapes , 1993 .

[10]  P. Feldman Evolution of sex , 1975, Nature.

[11]  B. Derrida,et al.  Stochastic models for species formation in evolving populations , 1991 .

[12]  Higgs Frequency distributions in population genetics parallel those in statistical physics. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[13]  Tarazona Error thresholds for molecular quasispecies as phase transitions: From simple landscapes to spin-glass models. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[14]  A. Perelson,et al.  Evolutionary walks on rugged landscapes , 1991 .

[15]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  M. Lynch,et al.  MULLER'S RATCHET AND MUTATIONAL MELTDOWNS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  M. Lynch,et al.  MUTATION LOAD AND THE SURVIVAL OF SMALL POPULATIONS , 1990, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[18]  M. Lynch,et al.  The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. , 1993, The Journal of heredity.

[19]  Paul Higgs,et al.  Error thresholds and stationary mutant distributions in multi-locus diploid genetics models , 1994 .

[20]  Weinberger,et al.  Local properties of Kauffman's N-k model: A tunably rugged energy landscape. , 1991, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[21]  E D Weinberger,et al.  Why some fitness landscapes are fractal. , 1993, Journal of theoretical biology.

[22]  J. Knott Dynamics of molecular evolution , 1986 .

[23]  Flyvbjerg,et al.  Evolution in a rugged fitness landscape. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[24]  W Stephan,et al.  The advance of Muller's ratchet in a haploid asexual population: approximate solutions based on diffusion theory. , 1993, Genetical research.

[25]  M. Nowak,et al.  Error thresholds of replication in finite populations mutation frequencies and the onset of Muller's ratchet. , 1989, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  J. Haigh The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population--Muller's Ratchet. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[27]  E. D. Weinberger,et al.  The NK model of rugged fitness landscapes and its application to maturation of the immune response. , 1989, Journal of theoretical biology.