A new one‐point quadrature enhanced assumed strain (EAS) solid‐shell element with multiple integration points along thickness—part II: nonlinear applications

Accuracy and efficiency are the main features expected in finite element method. In the field of low-order formulations, the treatment of locking phenomena is crucial to prevent poor results. For three-dimensional analysis, the development of efficient and accurate eight-node solid-shell finite elements has been the principal goal of a number of recent published works. When modelling thin- and thick-walled applications, the well-known transverse shear and volumetric locking phenomena should be conveniently circumvented. In this work, the enhanced assumed strain method and a reduced in-plane integration scheme are combined to produce a new eight-node solid-shell element, accommodating the use of any number of integration points along thickness direction. Furthermore, a physical stabilization procedure is employed in order to correct the element's rank deficiency. Several factors contribute to the high computational efficiency of the formulation, namely: (i) the use of only one internal variable per element for the enhanced part of the strain field; (ii) the reduced integration scheme; (iii) the prevention of using multiple elements' layers along thickness, which can be simply replaced by any number of integration points within a single element layer. Implementation guidelines and numerical results confirm the robustness and efficiency of the proposed approach when compared to conventional elements well-established in the literature. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  An enhanced strain 3D element for large deformation elastoplastic thin-shell applications , 2004 .

[2]  Peter Betsch,et al.  Numerical implementation of multiplicative elasto-plasticity into assumed strain elements with application to shells at large strains , 1999 .

[3]  E. Ramm,et al.  Three‐dimensional extension of non‐linear shell formulation based on the enhanced assumed strain concept , 1994 .

[4]  Michael A. Puso,et al.  A highly efficient enhanced assumed strain physically stabilized hexahedral element , 2000 .

[5]  Reinhard E. Piltner,et al.  An implementation of mixed enhanced finite elements with strains assumed in Cartesian and natural element coordinates using sparse B (overline)‐matrices , 2000 .

[6]  J. Yoon,et al.  One point quadrature shell element with through-thickness stretch , 2005 .

[7]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  Improved versions of assumed enhanced strain tri-linear elements for 3D finite deformation problems☆ , 1993 .

[8]  Ekkehard Ramm,et al.  Consistent linearization in elasto‐plastic shell analysis , 1988 .

[9]  B. Brank,et al.  On implementation of a nonlinear four node shell finite element for thin multilayered elastic shells , 1995 .

[10]  Jeong Whan Yoon,et al.  One point quadrature shell elements for sheet metal forming analysis , 2005 .

[11]  J. C. Simo,et al.  On a stress resultant geometrically exact shell model. Part II: the linear theory; computational aspects , 1989 .

[12]  Dominique Chapelle,et al.  The mathematical shell model underlying general shell elements , 2000 .

[13]  Edward L. Wilson,et al.  Incompatible Displacement Models , 1973 .

[14]  Loc Vu-Quoc,et al.  On a highly robust spurious‐mode filtering method for uniformly reduced‐integrated shell elements , 1992 .

[15]  E. Ramm,et al.  Shear deformable shell elements for large strains and rotations , 1997 .

[16]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  A continuum based 3d-shell element for laminated structures , 1999 .

[17]  R. Hauptmann,et al.  On volumetric locking of low‐order solid and solid‐shell elements for finite elastoviscoplastic deformations and selective reduced integration , 2000 .

[18]  R. Hauptmann,et al.  Extension of the ‘solid‐shell’ concept for application to large elastic and large elastoplastic deformations , 2000 .

[19]  S. Reese On the Equivalent of Mixed Element Formulations and the Concept of Reduced Integration in Large Deformation Problems , 2002 .

[20]  E. Ramm,et al.  Large elasto-plastic finite element analysis of solids and shells with the enhanced assumed strain concept , 1996 .

[21]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Geometrically non‐linear enhanced strain mixed methods and the method of incompatible modes , 1992 .

[22]  S. A. Meguid,et al.  A new shell element accounting for through-thickness deformation , 2000 .

[23]  Ekkehard Ramm,et al.  EAS‐elements for two‐dimensional, three‐dimensional, plate and shell structures and their equivalence to HR‐elements , 1993 .

[24]  Robert L. Taylor,et al.  A mixed-enhanced strain method: Part II: Geometrically nonlinear problems , 2000 .

[25]  Antoine Legay,et al.  Elastoplastic stability analysis of shells using the physically stabilized finite element SHB8PS , 2003 .

[26]  Stefanie Reese,et al.  A new stabilization technique for finite elements in non-linear elasticity , 1999 .

[27]  L. Vu-Quoc,et al.  A class of simple and efficient degenerated shell elements-analysis of global spurious-mode filtering , 1989 .

[28]  S. Reese,et al.  A comparison of three-dimensional continuum and shell elements for finite plasticity , 1996 .

[29]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A CLASS OF MIXED ASSUMED STRAIN METHODS AND THE METHOD OF INCOMPATIBLE MODES , 1990 .

[30]  K. S. Lo,et al.  Computer analysis in cylindrical shells , 1964 .

[31]  R. de Borst,et al.  Towards efficient and robust elements for 3D-soil plasticity , 1999 .

[32]  Eric P. Kasper,et al.  A mixed-enhanced strain method , 2000 .

[33]  Loc Vu-Quoc,et al.  A perturbation method for dynamic analyses using under-integrated shell elements , 1990 .

[34]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  A geometrical non‐linear brick element based on the EAS‐method , 1997 .

[35]  Sven Klinkel,et al.  A continuum based three-dimensional shell element for laminated structures , 1999 .

[36]  Serge Cescotto,et al.  An 8-node brick element with mixed formulation for large deformation analyses , 1997 .

[37]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  A new volumetric and shear locking‐free 3D enhanced strain element , 2003 .

[38]  H. Saunders Book Reviews : NUMERICAL METHODS IN FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS K.-J. Bathe and E.L. Wilson Prentice-Hall, Inc, Englewood Cliffs, NJ , 1978 .

[39]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Advances in one-point quadrature shell elements , 1992 .

[40]  Dong-Yol Yang,et al.  Elasto-plastic finite element method based on incremental deformation theory and continuum based shell elements for planar anisotropic sheet materials , 1999 .

[41]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures , 2000 .

[42]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Physical stabilization of the 4-node shell element with one point quadrature , 1994 .

[43]  R. Hauptmann,et al.  A SYSTEMATIC DEVELOPMENT OF 'SOLID-SHELL' ELEMENT FORMULATIONS FOR LINEAR AND NON-LINEAR ANALYSES EMPLOYING ONLY DISPLACEMENT DEGREES OF FREEDOM , 1998 .

[44]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[45]  M. Harnau,et al.  About linear and quadratic Solid-Shell elements at large deformations , 2002 .

[46]  Alexander G Iosilevich,et al.  An evaluation of the MITC shell elements , 2000 .

[47]  T. Hughes Generalization of selective integration procedures to anisotropic and nonlinear media , 1980 .

[48]  L. Vu-Quoc,et al.  Efficient and accurate multilayer solid‐shell element: non‐linear materials at finite strain , 2005 .

[49]  Medhat A. Haroun,et al.  Reduced and selective integration techniques in the finite element analysis of plates , 1978 .

[50]  Arif Masud,et al.  A stabilized 3-D co-rotational formulation for geometrically nonlinear analysis of multi-layered composite shells , 2000 .

[51]  J. M. A. César de Sá,et al.  Enhanced transverse shear strain shell formulation applied to large elasto‐plastic deformation problems , 2005 .

[52]  K. Bathe,et al.  A continuum mechanics based four‐node shell element for general non‐linear analysis , 1984 .

[53]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  A stabilization technique to avoid hourglassing in finite elasticity , 2000 .

[54]  Peter Wriggers,et al.  Finite element concepts for finite elastoplastic strains and isotropic stress response in shells: theoretical and computational analysis , 1999 .

[55]  Jeong Whan Yoon,et al.  A new one‐point quadrature enhanced assumed strain (EAS) solid‐shell element with multiple integration points along thickness: Part I—geometrically linear applications , 2005 .

[56]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  On the use of an enhanced transverse shear strain shell element for problems involving large rotations , 2003 .

[57]  L. Morley Skew plates and structures , 1963 .

[58]  Christian Miehe,et al.  Anisotropic elastic–plastic analysis of shells at large strains. A comparison of multiplicative and additive approaches to enhanced finite element design and constitutive modelling , 2004 .

[59]  R. M. Natal Jorge,et al.  New enhanced strain elements for incompressible problems , 1999 .

[60]  Renato Natal Jorge,et al.  Development of shear locking‐free shell elements using an enhanced assumed strain formulation , 2002 .

[61]  Christian Miehe,et al.  A theoretical and computational model for isotropic elastoplastic stress analysis in shells at large strains , 1998 .

[62]  R. Hauptmann,et al.  `Solid-shell' elements with linear and quadratic shape functions at large deformations with nearly incompressible materials , 2001 .

[63]  Francisco Armero,et al.  On the formulation of enhanced strain finite elements in finite deformations , 1997 .

[64]  E. Wilson,et al.  A non-conforming element for stress analysis , 1976 .

[65]  Rainald Löhner,et al.  A general advancing front technique for filling space with arbitrary objects , 2004 .

[66]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Assumed strain stabilization of the 4-node quadrilateral with 1-point quadrature for nonlinear problems , 1991 .

[67]  X. G. Tan,et al.  Optimal solid shells for non-linear analyses of multilayer composites. II. Dynamics , 2003 .

[68]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  A multiple-quadrature eight-node hexahedral finite element for large deformation elastoplastic analysis , 1998 .

[69]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  Reduced integration technique in general analysis of plates and shells , 1971 .

[70]  Frédéric Barlat,et al.  Development of a one point quadrature shell element for nonlinear applications with contact and anisotropy , 2002 .

[71]  S. Reese,et al.  A new locking-free brick element technique for large deformation problems in elasticity ☆ , 2000 .

[72]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Multiple quadrature underintegrated finite elements , 1994 .

[73]  Joze Korelc,et al.  Symbolic approach in computational mechanics and its application to the enhanced strain method , 1996 .

[74]  P. G. Bergan,et al.  Nonlinear analysis of free-form shells by flat finite elements , 1978 .