Public Sphere and Post-populism in the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Short Life of Depolarisation in Argentina

In this article, we examine whether the COVID-19 pandemic opens opportunities for consensual politics and the reconstruction of a pluralistic public sphere in countries characterised by polarised politics. Our focus is on how the Alberto Fernández administration in Argentina managed the crisis during 2020 and the window of opportunity that the pandemic created for a post-populist, depolarised scenario. Although the government initially tried to pursue consensual policymaking and foregrounded a public health response to the crisis, the prolonged nature of the health crisis, the toll of the pandemic, and the failure of government policies to address multiple aspects of the crisis reactivated political polarisation. The Argentine case helps to understand whether the politics of depolarisation amid the pandemic are possible and sustainable. Even with scientific expertise gaining significant presence, legitimacy and initial consensus, it is insufficient to chart out a path to depolarisation given persistent structural dynamics that foster sharp divisions.

[1]  Esther Greussing,et al.  From populism to the “plandemic”: why populists believe in COVID-19 conspiracies , 2021 .

[2]  Lenka Buštíková,et al.  Best in Covid: Populists in the Time of Pandemic , 2020, Politics and Governance.

[3]  Natalia Aruguete,et al.  Coronavirus en Argentina. Polarización partidaria, encuadres mediáticos y temor al riesgo , 2020 .

[4]  Jocelyn Getgen Kestenbaum,et al.  Populist Nationalism Threatens Health and Human Rights in the COVID-19 Response. , 2020, American journal of public health.

[5]  C. Mudde,et al.  Victims of the Pandemic? European Far-Right Parties and COVID-19 , 2020, Nationalities Papers.

[6]  C. del Rio,et al.  The Three Steps Needed to End the COVID-19 Pandemic: Bold Public Health Leadership, Rapid Innovations, and Courageous Political Will , 2020, JMIR public health and surveillance.

[7]  P. Stefanoni Between Fear and Disillusion in Argentina , 2019, NACLA Report on the Americas.

[8]  Thomas Häussler,et al.  Patterns of polarization: Transnational dynamics in climate change online networks in the US and Switzerland , 2019, Inf. Soc..

[9]  S. Waisbord Why Populism is Troubling for Democratic Communication , 2018 .

[10]  C. Puschmann,et al.  Alliance of antagonism: Counterpublics and polarization in online climate change communication , 2017 .

[11]  Jean Louise Cohen,et al.  Civil society, populism and religion , 2017 .

[12]  Enrique Peruzzotti Regime betterment or regime change? A critical review of recent debates on liberal democracy and populism in Latin America , 2017 .

[13]  B. Helmuth,et al.  Trust, tribalism and tweets: has political polarization made science a “wedge issue”? , 2016, Climate Change Responses.

[14]  Nadia Urbinati,et al.  Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth, and the People , 2014 .

[15]  Jonathan Rutherford,et al.  Return to society. , 2009 .

[16]  Pierre Ostiguy Peronismo y antiperonismo : bases socioculturales de la identidad política en la Argentina , 1997 .

[17]  S. Waisbord,et al.  The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism , 2021 .

[18]  J. C. Torre Los huérfanos de la política de partidos revisited , 2017 .

[19]  L. Avritzer Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America , 2009 .