Visualizing Fairness: Equity Maps for Planners

Abstract The achievement of equity in the distribution of public resources is a goal of paramount importance to planners. Equitable distribution entails locating resources or facilities so that as many different spatially defined social groups as possible benefit—i. e. have access. For planning purposes, what is of paramount importance is that planners and also their constituents understand what distributional principles underlie any geographic arrangement of public resources. This paper presents a prototype method with which planners can readily generate and evaluate various “equity maps” of resource distribution. The method exploits the visualization capabilities of GIS, which allow interactive exploration of the spatial relationships between public facilities and socioeconomic characteristics.

[1]  Michael Pacione,et al.  Access to urban services — the case of secondary schools in Glasgow , 1989 .

[2]  Michael Batty,et al.  Modelling Inside GIS: Part 1. Model Structures, Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis and Aggregation , 1994, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  W. Lucy.  Equity and Planning For Local Services , 1981 .

[4]  B. Milroy.  Constructing and Deconstructing Plausibility , 1989 .

[5]  A. N. White.  Accessibility and Public Facility Location , 1979 .

[6]  G. Leonardi,et al.  A Unifying Framework for Public Facility Location Problems—Part 1: A Critical Overview and Some Unsolved Problems , 1981 .

[7]  Stan C. M. Geertman,et al.  GIS and Models of Accessibility Potential: An Application in Planning , 1995, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Les Mayhew,et al.  Equity, Efficiency, and Accessibility in Urban and Regional Health-Care Systems , 1982 .

[9]  A S Fotheringham,et al.  The Modifiable Areal Unit Problem in Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1991 .

[10]  N. Krumholz.  A Retrospective View of Equity Planning Cleveland 1969–1979 , 1982 .

[11]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Linking GIS and spatial data analysis in practice , 1993 .

[12]  L. Staeheli.  ACCUMULATION, LEGITIMATION, AND THE PROVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES IN THE AMERICAN METROPOLIS , 1989 .

[13]  Norman Krumholz,et al.  Making Equity Planning Work: Leadership in the Public Sector , 1990 .

[14]  Harry J. P. Timmermans,et al.  Multistop-Based Measurements of Accessibility in a GIS Environment , 1994, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[15]  Harry W. Richardson,et al.  Market Planning Oxymoron or Common Sense , 1993 .

[16]  P. Knox,et al.  The Intraurban Ecology of Primary Medical Care: Patterns of Accessibility and Their Policy Implications , 1978 .

[17]  The Distribution of Benefits in an Urban Environment , 1977 .

[18]  A. L. White,et al.  Risk, compensation, and regional equity in locating hazardous facilities , 1989 .

[19]  H C W L Williams,et al.  Market-Area Analysis and Accessibility to Primary Health-Care Centres , 1992 .

[20]  N. Krumholz,et al.  The Cleveland Policy Planning Report , 1975 .

[21]  R. L. Hodgart.  Optimizing Access to Public Services: A Review of Problems, Models and Methods of Locating Central Facilities , 1978 .

[22]  L. Koppelman,et al.  Urban planning and design criteria , 1982 .

[23]  Michael T. Marsh,et al.  Equity measurement in facility location analysis: A review and framework , 1994 .

[24]  M. Truelove,et al.  Measurement of Spatial Equity , 1993 .

[25]  Llewellyn M. Toulmin.  Equity as a Decision Rule in Determining the Distribution of Urban Public Services , 1988 .

[26]  K. Arrow.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[27]  M. Pacione.  Public participation in neighbourhood change , 1988 .

[28]  J. G. Koenig,et al.  Indicators of urban accessibility: Theory and application , 1980 .

[29]  J. Humphreys.  Social provision and service delivery: Problems of equity, health, and health care in rural Australia , 1988 .

[30]  T. Banerjee.  Market Planning, Market Planners, and Planned Markets , 1993 .

[31]  Emily Talen,et al.  Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning , 1996 .

[32]  J. E. Seley.  The politics of public-facility planning , 1983 .

[33]  J. Crompton,et al.  Implementing a preferred equity model for the delivery of leisure services in the US context , 1988 .

[34]  Patterns of equity preferences among Californians for allocating park and recreation resources , 1992 .