Effect of Heterogeneous Investments on the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Game

Understanding the emergence of cooperation in spatial public goods game remains a grand challenge across disciplines. In most previous studies, it is assumed that the investments of all the cooperators are identical, and often equal to 1. However, it is worth mentioning that players are diverse and heterogeneous when choosing actions in the rapidly developing modern society and researchers have shown more interest to the heterogeneity of players recently. For modeling the heterogeneous players without loss of generality, it is assumed in this work that the investment of a cooperator is a random variable with uniform distribution, the mean value of which is equal to 1. The results of extensive numerical simulations convincingly indicate that heterogeneous investments can promote cooperation. Specifically, a large value of the variance of the random variable can decrease the two critical values for the result of behavioral evolution effectively. Moreover, the larger the variance is, the better the promotion effect will be. In addition, this article has discussed the impact of heterogeneous investments when the coevolution of both strategy and investment is taken into account. Comparing the promotion effect of coevolution of strategy and investment with that of strategy imitation only, we can conclude that the coevolution of strategy and investment decreases the asymptotic fraction of cooperators by weakening the heterogeneity of investments, which further demonstrates that heterogeneous investments can promote cooperation in spatial public goods game.

[1]  Jian-Fang Zhou,et al.  Spontaneous scale-free structure in adaptive networks with synchronously dynamical linking. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[2]  Zhen Wang,et al.  If players are sparse social dilemmas are too: Importance of percolation for evolution of cooperation , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[3]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Interdependent network reciprocity in evolutionary games , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game , 2010, ArXiv.

[5]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Coveting thy neighbors fitness as a means to resolve social dilemmas , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  Chengyi Xia,et al.  Inferring Reputation Promotes the Evolution of Cooperation in Spatial Social Dilemma Games , 2012, PloS one.

[7]  Zhen Wang,et al.  Impact of Social Punishment on Cooperative Behavior in Complex Networks , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[8]  F. C. Santos,et al.  Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games , 2008, Nature.

[9]  G. Szabó,et al.  Evolutionary games on graphs , 2006, cond-mat/0607344.

[10]  Gary Bornstein,et al.  Cooperation in Intergroup and Single-Group Social Dilemmas , 1994 .

[11]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[12]  Michael Doebeli,et al.  Diversity of Cooperation in the Tragedy of the Commons , 2010 .

[13]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Topology-independent impact of noise on cooperation in spatial public goods games. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Francesco Guala,et al.  Heterogeneous Agents in Public Goods Experiments , 2005 .

[15]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Aspiring to the Fittest and Promotion of Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: a review , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[17]  Elizabeth Pennisi,et al.  How Did Cooperative Behavior Evolve? , 2005, Science.

[18]  Xianbin Cao,et al.  Integrating neighborhoods in the evaluation of fitness promotes cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game , 2010, ArXiv.

[19]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Optimal interdependence between networks for the evolution of cooperation , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Long Wang,et al.  Adaptive and Bounded Investment Returns Promote Cooperation in Spatial Public Goods Games , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  Urs Fischbacher,et al.  Heterogeneous Social Preferences and the Dynamics of Free Riding in Public Goods , 2006, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[22]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Self-organization towards optimally interdependent networks by means of coevolution , 2014, ArXiv.

[23]  Daniele Vilone,et al.  Evolutionary Games defined at the Network Mesoscale: The Public Goods game , 2010, Chaos.

[24]  György Szabó,et al.  Phase transitions and volunteering in spatial public goods games. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[25]  E. Fehr,et al.  Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments , 1999, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[26]  Z. Wang,et al.  The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks , 2014, Physics Reports.

[27]  Zhihai Rong,et al.  Effect of the degree correlation in public goods game on scale-free networks , 2009 .

[28]  Lin Wang,et al.  Noise-induced enhancement of network reciprocity in social dilemmas , 2013, 1303.1959.

[29]  Dawei Zhao,et al.  Immunization of Epidemics in Multiplex Networks , 2014, PloS one.

[30]  C. Hauert,et al.  Punishment and reputation in spatial public goods games , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  M. Milinski,et al.  Volunteering leads to rock–paper–scissors dynamics in a public goods game , 2003, Nature.

[32]  C. Hauert,et al.  Punishing and abstaining for public goods , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Zhi-Xi Wu,et al.  Effects of inhomogeneous activity of players and noise on cooperation in spatial public goods games. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[34]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Evolution of public cooperation on interdependent networks: The impact of biased utility functions , 2012, ArXiv.

[35]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Collective behavior and evolutionary games - An introduction , 2013, 1306.2296.

[36]  Bing-Hong Wang,et al.  Group diversity promotes cooperation in the spatial public goods game , 2010 .

[37]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  Social norms and human cooperation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Punish, but not too hard: how costly punishment spreads in the spatial public goods game , 2010, 1007.0431.

[39]  Zhen Wang,et al.  How human location-specific contact patterns impact spatial transmission between populations? , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[40]  Lin Wang,et al.  Degree mixing in multilayer networks impedes the evolution of cooperation , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[41]  P. Kollock SOCIAL DILEMMAS: The Anatomy of Cooperation , 1998 .

[42]  Lin Wang,et al.  Spatial epidemiology of networked metapopulation: an overview , 2014, bioRxiv.