Defenses and conservative revisions of evidential decision theories: Metatickles and ratificationism

[1]  D. J. White,et al.  Decision Theory , 2018, Behavioral Finance for Private Banking.

[2]  Jordan Howard Sobel Partition-Theorems for Causal Decision Theories , 1989, Philosophy of Science.

[3]  Self-doubts and dutch strategies , 1987 .

[4]  Wlodek Rabinowicz Ratificationism without ratification: Jeffrey meets Savage , 1985 .

[5]  E. Eells Metatickles and the dynamics of deliberation , 1984 .

[6]  P. Weirich Decisions in Dynamic Settings , 1986, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.

[7]  D. F. Kerridge,et al.  The Logic of Decision , 1967 .

[8]  Richard C. Jeffrey,et al.  A note on the kinematics of preference , 1977 .

[9]  J. Sobel Notes on decision theory: Old wine in new bottles , 1986 .

[10]  Richard Jeffrey The logic of decision defended , 2005, Synthese.

[11]  Decision Theory in Light of Newcomb's Problem , 1985, Philosophy of Science.

[12]  J. Sobel Circumstances and dominance in a causal decision theory , 1985, Synthese.

[13]  Causality, utility, and decision , 1981, Synthese.

[14]  H. Price Against causal decision theory , 1986, Synthese.

[15]  R. Jeffrey How to Probabilize a Newcomb Problem , 1988 .

[16]  Jordan Howard Sobel Metatickles, Ratificationism, and Newcomb-Like Problems without Dominance , 1988 .

[17]  Robert Nozick,et al.  Newcomb’s Problem and Two Principles of Choice , 1969 .

[18]  Common Causes and Decision Theory , 1986, Philosophy of Science.

[19]  E. Eells Causal Decision Theory , 1984, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.