Defenses and conservative revisions of evidential decision theories: Metatickles and ratificationism
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. J. White,et al. Decision Theory , 2018, Behavioral Finance for Private Banking.
[2] Jordan Howard Sobel. Partition-Theorems for Causal Decision Theories , 1989, Philosophy of Science.
[3] Self-doubts and dutch strategies , 1987 .
[4] Wlodek Rabinowicz. Ratificationism without ratification: Jeffrey meets Savage , 1985 .
[5] E. Eells. Metatickles and the dynamics of deliberation , 1984 .
[6] P. Weirich. Decisions in Dynamic Settings , 1986, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.
[7] D. F. Kerridge,et al. The Logic of Decision , 1967 .
[8] Richard C. Jeffrey,et al. A note on the kinematics of preference , 1977 .
[9] J. Sobel. Notes on decision theory: Old wine in new bottles , 1986 .
[10] Richard Jeffrey. The logic of decision defended , 2005, Synthese.
[11] Decision Theory in Light of Newcomb's Problem , 1985, Philosophy of Science.
[12] J. Sobel. Circumstances and dominance in a causal decision theory , 1985, Synthese.
[13] Causality, utility, and decision , 1981, Synthese.
[14] H. Price. Against causal decision theory , 1986, Synthese.
[15] R. Jeffrey. How to Probabilize a Newcomb Problem , 1988 .
[16] Jordan Howard Sobel. Metatickles, Ratificationism, and Newcomb-Like Problems without Dominance , 1988 .
[17] Robert Nozick,et al. Newcomb’s Problem and Two Principles of Choice , 1969 .
[18] Common Causes and Decision Theory , 1986, Philosophy of Science.
[19] E. Eells. Causal Decision Theory , 1984, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association.