Differential Analysis Of Bilateral Mammograms

Computer support for early detection of breast cancer requires a proper mimicking of the way radiologists compare mammographic images; by comparing bilateral (images of the left and right breasts) and temporal images. In this paper, one method for bilateral registration and intensity normalization and two methods for difference analysis are described. The bilateral registration is based on anatomical features and assumptions of how the female breast is deformed under compression. The first method for differential analysis is based on the absolute difference between the registered images while the second method is based on statistical differences between properties of corresponding neighborhoods. The methods are tested on images from the MIAS database (on 100 images with 59 abnormalities distributed over four types) and evaluated by FROC-analysis. The performances of the two methods are similar but the statistical method gives better performance at a lower false positive rate and is better in particular for detecting asymmetrical developments.

[1]  Gunilla Borgefors,et al.  Distance transformations in digital images , 1986, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[2]  P.K Sahoo,et al.  A survey of thresholding techniques , 1988, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[3]  D. Kopans,et al.  Asymmetric breast tissue. , 1989, Radiology.

[4]  T K Lau,et al.  Automated detection of breast tumors using the asymmetry approach. , 1991, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[5]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  AUTOMATED DETECTION OF MAMMOGRAPHIC ASYMMETRY USING ANATOMICAL FEATURES , 1993 .

[6]  K Doi,et al.  Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique. , 1994, Medical physics.

[7]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Ralph Highnam,et al.  Comparing Mammogram Pairs for the Detection of Lesions , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[9]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Sites of Occurrence of Malignancies in Mammograms , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[10]  P. G. Tahoces,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms. , 1998, Medical physics.

[11]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Clinical Results with R2 Imagechecker System , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[12]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Combining Single View Features and Asymmetry for Detection of Mass Lesions , 1998, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[13]  Kevin W. Bowyer,et al.  Registration and difference analysis of corresponding mammogram images , 1999, Medical Image Anal..

[14]  Yasuyo Kita,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of microcalcification clusters from two mammographic views , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Fredrik Georgsson,et al.  The accuracy of geometric approximation of the mamilla in mammograms , 2003, CARS.