Changing ecological constraints of practice alters coordination of dynamic interceptive actions

Abstract The ecological constraints of practice have a significant effect on the acquisition of functional information–movement couplings and learners need to converge on information-specifying perceptual variables. Consequently, the prolonged and widespread use of ball projection machines for the practice of interceptive actions may lack theoretical foundation because they afford information-specifying variables that are not present in competition. The timing and coordination of the forward defensive stroke in cricket batting were examined in experienced batters under two typical practice task constraints: batting against a representative “real” bowler and a representative bowling machine (mean delivery velocity 26.76 m·s−1 under both conditions). Significant adaptation of coordination and timing was observed under the different practice task constraints. For example, initiation of the backswing was later against a bowler and downswing was faster with a different ratio of backswing–downswing when batting against the bowling machine (47%–53%) compared with the bowler (54%–46%). Peak bat height differed under the two constraints (bowling machine: mean 1.56 m, s=19.89; bowler: 1.72 m, s=10.36 m). Mean length of front foot stride was shorter against the bowling machine (0.55 m, s=0.07 m) than the bowler (0.59 m, s=0.06 m). The correlation between initiation of backswing and front foot movement was much higher against the bowler (r = 0.88) than the bowling machine (r=0.65).

[1]  K. Davids,et al.  Ecological Validity, Representative Design, and Correspondence Between Experimental Task Constraints and Behavioral Setting: Comment on Rogers, Kadar, and Costall (2005) , 2007 .

[2]  B. Abernethy,et al.  How do World-Class Cricket Batsmen Anticipate a Bowler's Intention? , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  K. Davids,et al.  The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport , 2006 .

[4]  Keith Davids,et al.  Movement Models from Sports Provide Representative Task Constraints for Studying Adaptive Behavior in Human Movement Systems , 2006, Adapt. Behav..

[5]  K. Davids,et al.  An ecological approach to expertise effects in decision-making in a simulated sailing regatta , 2005 .

[6]  Keith Davids,et al.  Movement Models from Sports Reveal Fundamental Insights into Coordination Processes , 2005, Exercise and sport sciences reviews.

[7]  P J Beek,et al.  Modelling the control of interceptive actions. , 2003, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  R. Bartlett The science and medicine of cricket: an overview and update , 2003, Journal of sports sciences.

[9]  D. M. Jacobs,et al.  On the Apparent Paradox of Learning and Realism , 2002 .

[10]  R. Bartlett,et al.  Research design and statistics in biomechanics and motor control , 2001, Journal of sports sciences.

[11]  Michael F. Land,et al.  From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[12]  John van der Kamp,et al.  Information in learning to co-ordinate and control movements: Is there a need for specificity of practice? , 2000 .

[13]  M. Fairweather,et al.  Cricket bowling deliveries and the discrimination ability of professional and amateur batters , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[14]  Gilles Montagne,et al.  Movement reversals in ball catching , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  R. Stretch,et al.  Kinematics and kinetics of the drive off the front foot in cricket batting. , 1998, Journal of sports sciences.

[16]  Alfred W. Hubbard,et al.  Visual Movements of Batters , 1954 .

[17]  Cover Sheet Ecological Validity, Representative Design and Correspondence between Experimental Task Constraints and Behavioral Settings , 2006 .

[18]  D. M. Jacobs,et al.  Expert performance in sport: Views from the joint perspectives of ecological psychology and dynamical systems theory , 2003 .

[19]  M. Fairweather,et al.  Do bowler's delivery characteristics influence spatial discrimination in batters? , 2003 .

[20]  D Regan,et al.  Visual factors in hitting and catching. , 1997, Journal of sports sciences.

[21]  B. Abernethy,et al.  Advance cue utilisation by skilled cricket batsmen , 1984 .

[22]  Bruce Abernethy,et al.  Mechanisms of skill in cricket batting , 1981 .

[23]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[24]  Liss Hr INTRODUCTION TO BIOMECHANICS. , 1965 .