Web-based accurate measurements of carotid lumen diameter and stenosis severity: An ultrasound-based clinical tool for stroke risk assessment during multicenter clinical trials

BACKGROUND This pilot study presents a completely automated, novel, smart, cloud-based, point-of-care system for (a) carotid lumen diameter (LD); (b) stenosis severity index (SSI) and (c) total lumen area (TLA) measurement using B-mode ultrasound. The proposed system was (i) validated against manual reading taken by the Neurologist and (ii) benchmarked against the commercially available system. METHOD One hundred patients (73 M/27 F, mean age: 68 ± 11 years), institutional review board approved, written informed consent, consisted of left/right common carotid artery (200 ultrasound scans) were acquired using a 7.5-MHz linear transducer. RESULTS The measured mean LD for left and right carotids were (in mm): (i) for proposed system (6.49 ± 1.77, 6.66 ± 1.70); and (ii) for manual (6.29 ± 1.79, 6.45 ± 1.63), respectively and coefficient of correlation between cloud-based automated against manual were 0.98 (P < 0.0001) and 0.99 (P < 0.0001), respectively. The corresponding TLA error, Precision-of-Merit, and Figure-of-Merit when measured against the manual were: 4.56 ± 3.54%, 96.18 ± 3.21%, and 96.85%, respectively. The AUC for the receiving operating characteristics for the cloud-based system was: 1.0. Four statistical tests such as: Two-tailed z-test, Mann-Whitney test, Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) and one-way ANOVA were performed to demonstrate consistency and reliability. CONCLUSIONS The proposed system is reliable, accurate, fast, completely automated, anytime-anywhere solution for multi-center clinical trials and routine vascular screening.

[1]  W. Edwards,et al.  Arterial calcification and not lumen stenosis is highly correlated with atherosclerotic plaque burden in humans: a histologic study of 723 coronary artery segments using nondecalcifying methodology. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Ultrasound-Based Automated Carotid Lumen Diameter/Stenosis Measurement and its Validation System , 2016 .

[3]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Multi-Modality Atherosclerosis Imaging and Diagnosis , 2013 .

[4]  Guang Zeng,et al.  Carotid artery recognition system: a comparison of three automated paradigms for ultrasound images. , 2011, Medical physics.

[5]  Ajay Gupta,et al.  Two Automated Techniques for Carotid Lumen Diameter Measurement: Regional versus Boundary Approaches , 2016, Journal of Medical Systems.

[6]  P. Humphrey,et al.  Complications of cerebral angiography in patients with symptomatic carotid territory ischaemia screened by carotid ultrasound. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[7]  Ajay Gupta,et al.  Accurate cloud-based smart IMT measurement, its validation and stroke risk stratification in carotid ultrasound: A web-based point-of-care tool for multicenter clinical trial , 2016, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[8]  Filippo Molinari,et al.  Intima-media thickness: setting a standard for a completely automated method of ultrasound measurement , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  Petia Radeva,et al.  Reliable and Accurate Calcium Volume Measurement in Coronary Artery Using Intravascular Ultrasound Videos , 2016, Journal of Medical Systems.

[10]  A. Fox,et al.  How to measure carotid stenosis. , 1993, Radiology.

[11]  R. Ross,et al.  Cell biology of atherosclerosis. , 1995, Annual review of physiology.

[12]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  AUTOMATIC COMPUTER-BASED TRACINGS (ACT) IN LONGITUDINAL 2-D ULTRASOUND IMAGES USING DIFFERENT SCANNERS , 2009 .

[13]  D E Strandness,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis--where do we go from here? , 1998, European journal of ultrasound : official journal of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[14]  Filippo Molinari,et al.  Comparison between manual and automated analysis for the quantification of carotid wall by using sonography. A validation study with CT. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[15]  M. Brown,et al.  International Carotid Stenting Study: Protocol for a Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing Carotid Stenting with Endarterectomy in Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis , 2004, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[16]  J S Suri,et al.  Automated and accurate carotid bulb detection, its verification and validation in low quality frozen frames and motion video. , 2014, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[17]  S E Greenwald Pulse pressure and arterial elasticity. , 2002, QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians.

[18]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Executive Summary: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2015 Update A Report From the American Heart Association , 2011, Circulation.

[19]  P. Libby,et al.  Progress and challenges in translating the biology of atherosclerosis , 2011, Nature.

[20]  M. Leon,et al.  Determinants and correlates of target lesion calcium in coronary artery disease: a clinical, angiographic and intravascular ultrasound study. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Jeny Rajan,et al.  Carotid inter‐adventitial diameter is more strongly related to plaque score than lumen diameter: An automated tool for stroke analysis , 2016, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[22]  F. Lizzi Ultrasound Imaging , 1991, Proceedings Technology Requirements for Biomedical Imaging.

[23]  J. Suri,et al.  What is the correct distance measurement metric when measuring carotid ultrasound intima-media thickness automatically? , 2012, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[24]  J. Zamorano,et al.  The use of pocket-size imaging devices: a position statement of the European Association of Echocardiography. , 2011, European journal of echocardiography : the journal of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology.

[25]  Guy Cloutier,et al.  Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque Evaluation by Ultrasound, Computed Tomography Angiography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Overview , 2014, Canadian Association of Radiologists journal = Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes.

[26]  Nilanjan Dey,et al.  Effect of Watermarking on Diagnostic Preservation of Atherosclerotic Ultrasound Video in Stroke Telemedicine , 2016, Journal of Medical Systems.

[27]  Jasjit S Suri,et al.  A Review on Atherosclerotic Biology, Wall Stiffness, Physics of Elasticity, and Its Ultrasound-Based Measurement , 2016, Current Atherosclerosis Reports.

[28]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Inter-observer Variability Analysis of Automatic Lung Delineation in Normal and Disease Patients , 2016, Journal of Medical Systems.

[29]  George Howard,et al.  Safety of Stenting and Endarterectomy by Symptomatic Status in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST) , 2011, Stroke.

[30]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Hypothesis Validation of Far-Wall Brightness in Carotid-Artery Ultrasound for Feature-Based IMT Measurement Using a Combination of Level-Set Segmentation and Registration , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[31]  C. Zarins,et al.  Carotid Bifurcation Atherosclerosis: Quantitative Correlation of Plaque Localization with Flow Velocity Profiles and Wall Shear Stress , 1983, Circulation research.