Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Kidney Injury Outcomes Post Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant

Introduction Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are used as a bridge to heart transplant or destination therapy for patients with the New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3 or 4 heart failure. Acute kidney injury (AKI) or need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) post-LVAD implant can lead to poor outcomes. Identifying risk factors of AKI post-LVAD implant can help stratify potential LVAD candidates. Methods This is a retrospective study of all patients who received continuous-flow LVAD at our institution from January 2015 until August 2017. We calculated the incidence of AKI and the need for RRT post-LVAD implant, as well as the rate of renal recovery and survival rates at 30 days and 1-year post-LVAD implant. The presence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and proteinuria was assessed, and kidney ultrasound results were reviewed on all patients, if available. CKD was present if estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was <60 mL/min per 1.73m2 for ≥3 months preceding LVAD implant and/or presence of proteinuria ≥ 20 mg/dL on two or more urine samples prior to LVAD implant and/or an abnormal kidney ultrasound with increased echogenicity, small size <9 cm or scarring. AKI was defined as per the current Kidney Disease Initiative Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines. Results A total of 137 patients received LVAD during this time period. There were 112 males and 25 females with a mean age of 59.2 years. Incidence of AKI and the need for RRT post-LVAD implant were 64% and 19.7%, respectively. Sub-group analysis was performed based on the presence of CKD, advanced CKD stage (Stage 1-2 vs 3-5), proteinuria and abnormal kidney ultrasound. The incidence of AKI post-LVAD implant was significantly higher if baseline CKD was present (P = 0.028), and patient had an advanced CKD stage (P = 0.008). The need for RRT post-LVAD implant was significantly higher if baseline CKD was present (P = 0.015), and the patient had an abnormal kidney ultrasound (P = 0.04). Thirty-day and one-year mortality rates post-LVAD implants were 4.3% and 21.1%, respectively for the entire cohort. Out of the 27 patients requiring RRT, nine (33.3%) came off RRT before one year. Compared to the eGFR on the day of LVAD implant, eGFR at 30 days post-LVAD implant was higher in 57% and lower in 42% patients. At one year, this eGFR improvement reversed and eGFR was lower in 67% and higher in 32% patients. Conclusion The incidence of AKI and need for RRT post-LVAD implant are very high. The presence of CKD, advanced CKD stage, and an abnormal kidney ultrasound are statistically significant risk factors of AKI post-LVAD implant and/or need for RRT. Identifying these renal risk factors can help stratify the potential LVAD candidates. Only one out of three patients requiring RRT achieved dialysis independence by one-year post-LVAD implant.

[1]  J. Felius,et al.  Outcomes of Moderate-to-Severe Acute Kidney Injury following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation , 2019, Cardiorenal Medicine.

[2]  S. Russell,et al.  Acute kidney injury and 1-year mortality after left ventricular assist device implantation. , 2018, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[3]  Leway Chen,et al.  Renal Function Changes Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation. , 2017, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  A. Kilic,et al.  To ventricular assist devices or not: When is implantation of a ventricular assist device appropriate in advanced ambulatory heart failure? , 2016, World journal of cardiology.

[5]  Cellular,et al.  Ganong's review of medical physiology , 2016 .

[6]  A. Khwaja KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Acute Kidney Injury , 2012, Nephron Clinical Practice.

[7]  R. Rodeheffer,et al.  Changes in renal function after implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  S. Russell,et al.  Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Karen Ulisney,et al.  INTERMACS profiles of advanced heart failure: the current picture. , 2009, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[10]  J. Shinn Implantable Left Ventricular Assist Devices , 2005, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[11]  Denton A. Cooley,et al.  The total artificial heart , 2003, Nature Medicine.

[12]  D. DeMets,et al.  Effect of carvedilol on survival in severe chronic heart failure. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  R. Körfer,et al.  Single-center experience with the thoratec ventricular assist device. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  D. Pennington,et al.  Eight years' experience with bridging to cardiac transplantation. , 1994, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[15]  O H Frazier,et al.  Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate 1000 IP left ventricular assist device. , 1992, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  M. Vanantwerp,et al.  The Artificial Heart Program: Current Status and History , 1991 .

[17]  M E DeBakey,et al.  Left ventricular bypass pump for cardiac assistance. Clinical experience. , 1971, The American journal of cardiology.