Survival of the leanest: intensive knowledge work and groupware adaptation

Managing knowledge is a value‐creating process in most organizations and is particularly important in knowledge‐intensive firms. Explores the ways in which groupware might facilitate processes of knowledge creation within a particular type of knowledge‐intensive firm. Based on a case study analysis of an expert consultancy where e‐mail was used successfully for information and knowledge search, and Lotus Notes was used with mixed results in project working, argues that the complexity of articulating the knowledge creation process can be reduced by using e‐mail. Furthermore, e‐mail, when considered in context, is potentially a rich medium for the development of collective knowledge over time despite its purported lean characteristics. Also concludes that, although distributed Lotus Notes databases can obviously alleviate temporal and spatial complexity, this media lacks the richness required for complex processes of knowledge creation. Thus, where temporal and spatial constraints do not exist, there will be substantial barriers for using groupware to support processes of knowledge creation in this type of knowledge‐intensive firm.

[1]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations , 1983 .

[2]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  A guide to manage new software engineering tools , 1997 .

[3]  Sue Newell,et al.  Knowledge management-when will people management enter the debate? , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[4]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[5]  L. Prusak.  Knowledge in organizations , 1997 .

[6]  Clarence A. Ellis,et al.  Groupware: some issues and experiences , 1991, CACM.

[7]  M. Alvesson.  Management Of Knowledge-Intensive Companies , 1995 .

[8]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[9]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  Innovation through knowledge codification , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Structuring computer-mediated communication systems to avoid information overload , 1985, CACM.

[11]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[12]  Sue Newell,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation: networks and networking , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[13]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media , 1992 .

[14]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[15]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[17]  Helena Karsten,et al.  Constructing Interdependencies with Collaborative Information Technology , 2000 .

[18]  M. Markus.  Electronic Mail as the Medium of Managerial Choice , 1994 .

[19]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Coordination in software development , 1995, CACM.

[20]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[21]  D. Straub,et al.  Knowledge Worker Communications and Recipient Availability: Toward a Task Closure Explanation of Media Choice , 1998 .

[22]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  Are you "pulling the plug" or "pushing up the daisies"? [communication patterns] , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[24]  Sue Newell,et al.  Limits of IT-driven knowledge management initiatives for interactive innovation processes: towards a community-based approach , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[25]  Betty Vandenbosch,et al.  Information Overload in a Groupware Environment: Now You See It, Now You Don't , 1998, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[26]  F. Blackler.  Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[27]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations , 1993 .

[28]  W. Starbuck.  Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[29]  Allen S. Lee.  Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[30]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  Navigating the World Wide Web: bookmark maintenance architectures , 2001, Interact. Comput..

[31]  Helena Karsten,et al.  "It's like everyone working around the same desk": Organisational Readings of Lotus Notes , 1995, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Stuart Macdonald,et al.  The Informal Information Network in an Age of Advanced Telecommunications , 1992 .

[33]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 1999 .

[34]  Masao Kakihara,et al.  Knowledge discourses and interaction technology , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[35]  Carsten Sørensen,et al.  Surveying the World Wide Web , 1999, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Kjeld Schmidt,et al.  Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work * , 1992 .

[37]  M. Alvesson.  Social Indentity And The Problem of Loyalty In Knowledge‐Intensive Companies , 2000 .

[38]  J. Spender.  Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory , 1996 .

[39]  C. Ciborra,et al.  Groupware and teamwork in new product development: the case of a consumer goods multinational , 1997 .