The determinants of environmental innovation: the impacts of environmental policies on the Nordic pulp, paper and packaging industries

Innovations may have positive societal effects such as improved environmental performance, and they are often portrayed as solutions to environmental problems. However, the mechanisms through which innovations develop and the ways in which public incentives support improved environmental performance of innovations are complex. This paper uses empirical cases to examine how environmental policies, market factors and technological push affect process and product innovations in the Nordic pulp, paper and packaging industries. The results show that environmental improvements in technologies and products are simultaneously driven by all three of these factors. Environmental innovations are often developed in anticipation of future policy or as side-effects of existing policies. However, while environmental policy directly influences process innovations, its connection to product innovations is less clear. The study points towards the importance of gradually tightening and predictable environmental policies that are flexible enough to allow the exploration of new technological developments. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

[1]  Heli Saarikoski,et al.  Finnish waste policy—effects and effectiveness , 2002 .

[2]  James G. March,et al.  Crossroads---Organizational Performance as a Dependent Variable , 1997 .

[3]  J. Hemmelskamp,et al.  Environmental policy instruments and their effects on innovation , 1997 .

[4]  K. Rennings.  Redefining innovation -- eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics , 2000 .

[5]  P Ekins,et al.  Environmental policy and technical change: a comparison of the technological impact of policy instruments. , 1999 .

[6]  Paula Kivimaa,et al.  Driving Forces for Environmentally Sounder Innovations: The Case of Finnish Pulp and Paper Industry , 2004 .

[7]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[8]  Andries Hoogerwerf,et al.  Reconstructing policy theory , 1990 .

[9]  Renate Mayntz,et al.  From government to governance : Political Steering in Modern Societies* , 2006 .

[10]  K. Rennings,et al.  Determinants of environmental product and process innovation , 1999 .

[11]  A. Jaffe,et al.  A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy , 2005 .

[12]  Vicki Norberg-Bohm,et al.  Stimulating ‘green’ technological innovation: An analysis of alternative policy mechanisms , 1999 .

[13]  W. Orlikowski.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000 .

[14]  K. Rennings,et al.  Lead markets and regulation: a framework for analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations , 2005 .

[15]  Geert Bouckaert,et al.  Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis , 2004 .

[16]  I. Rozanov,et al.  Innovation Processes , 2021, Catalyzing Innovations for a Sustainable Future.

[17]  Nicholas A. Ashford,et al.  Government and Environmental Innovation in Europe and North America , 2002 .

[18]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Environmental Policy and Technological Change , 2002 .

[19]  Mikael Hildén,et al.  Environmental policies and marine engines—effects on the development and adoption of innovations , 2004 .

[20]  Carl Dalhammar,et al.  Extended Producer Responsibility as a driver for product chain improvement , 2006 .

[21]  R. Garud,et al.  Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[22]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Technological Change and the Environment , 2000 .