Inhibition of return spreads across 3-D space

Focusing attention to a location in 3–D space operates much the same as in 2–D space. Attending a location in 2–D space is followed by a selective inhibitory aftereffect known as inhibition of return (IOR). Here, we report the results of two 3–D reflexive cuing studies in which depth was defined by binocular disparity. As has been shown before, attentional cuing was specific for x–y–z locations. However, the present results show that IOR is not depth specific. After a specific location in x–y–z is cued, IOR occurs for the depth plane in front of and behind the cued location. The finding that IOR spreads across depth planes may be related to how inhibited locations are encoded in the superior colliculus. We argue that the functional role of a depth–blind IOR is to bias attention against going back to any part of a previously attended object.

[1]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Oculomotor capture and Inhibition of Return: Evidence for an oculomotor suppression account of IOR , 2002, Psychological research.

[2]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Limits of focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  James M. Hillis,et al.  The effect of the physical characteristics of cues and targets on facilitation and inhibition , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[4]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[5]  H. Deubel,et al.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism , 1996, Vision Research.

[6]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Spatial cuing in a stereoscopic display: Evidence for a “depth-aware” attentional focus , 1997 .

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[8]  G J Andersen,et al.  Focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional control within 3-D space. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Silvia M. Mueller,et al.  An in-depth look at visual attention , 1994 .

[11]  G WESTHEIMER,et al.  Independence of conjugate and disjunctive eye movements , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  L E Mays,et al.  Signal transformations required for the generation of saccadic eye movements. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  G. Tassinari,et al.  Covert orienting to non-informative cues: reaction time studies , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[15]  R A Abrams,et al.  Inhibition of return in discrimination tasks. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[17]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  J. Pratt,et al.  The Spatial Distribution of Inhibition of Return , 2001, Psychological science.

[19]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Object and space-based attentional selection in three-dimensional space , 2001 .

[20]  J. Theeuwes.  Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Attention and performance X : control of language processes , 1986 .

[22]  S. Tipper,et al.  On the Strategic Modulation of the Time Course of Facilitation and Inhibition of Return , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  Raymond M. Klein,et al.  On the causes and effects of inhibition of return , 1998 .

[24]  Eliana M. Klier,et al.  The superior colliculus encodes gaze commands in retinal coordinates , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.