Distinctness of others, mutability of selves: their impact on self-evaluations.

The authors postulate that the outcome of social comparison processes is determined by the role social comparison information serves during the self-evaluation process. Assimilation is more likely in situations that instigate the inclusion of social comparison information in self-representations. Contrast is the more probable outcome when information about another person is used as a reference point for self-judgments. Whether comparison information instigates interpretation or comparison effects depends on the distinctness of this information as well as the perceived mutability of the self. The authors found support for their perspective using different types of manipulations of the distinctness construct, treating self-mutability as a contextual as well as an individual-difference variable, and measuring the effects of social comparisons on measures likely to reveal both assimilation and contrast effects (self-evaluative judgments and behavioral predictions), assimilation effects only (mood measures), and motivational self-repair effects (importance ratings of the focal comparison dimension).

[1]  F. Gibbons,et al.  Social comparison and depression: company's effect on misery. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  K. Gergen,et al.  Social comparison, self-consistency, and the concept of self. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Classic and current social comparison research: Expanding the perspective. , 1990 .

[4]  J. Bargh.  The automaticity of everyday life. , 1997 .

[5]  Tom Postmes,et al.  Seeing one thing and doing another: Contrast effects in automatic behavior. , 1998 .

[6]  B. Major,et al.  Responses to upward and downward social comparisons: The impact of esteem-relevance and perceived control , 1991 .

[7]  D A Stapel,et al.  Let’s Not Forget the Past When We Go to the Future: On Our Knowledge of Knowledge Accessibility , 2001 .

[8]  J. F. Ybema,et al.  Affective responses to social comparison: a study among disabled individuals. , 1995, The British journal of social psychology.

[9]  M. Leary,et al.  Selfhood: Identity, Esteem, Regulation (Social Psychology Series) , 1998 .

[10]  C. I. Hovland,et al.  Social Judgment: Assimilation and Contrast Effects in Communication and Attitude Change , 1981 .

[11]  Bram P. Buunk,et al.  Health, Coping, and Well-being : Perspectives From Social Comparison Theory , 1997 .

[12]  R. Erber,et al.  Affective and semantic priming: Effects of mood on category accessibility and inference , 1991 .

[13]  P. Winkielman,et al.  Assimilation and Contrast as a Function of Context-Target Similarity, Distinctness, and Dimensional Relevance , 1998 .

[14]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  The construction of social norms and standards. , 1996 .

[15]  J. V. Wood,et al.  Theory and Research Concerning Social Comparisons of Personal Attributes , 1989 .

[16]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Constructing reality and its alternatives: an inclusion/ exclusion model of assimilation and contrast effects in social judgment , 1992 .

[17]  G. Bower,et al.  Mood effects on person-perception judgments. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  M. L. Klotz,et al.  Personal contact, individuation, and the better-than-average effect. , 1995 .

[19]  A. Buunk.  Social comparison and occupational stress: the identification-contrast model , 1997 .

[20]  E. Higgins,et al.  Handbook of motivation and cognition : foundations of social behavior , 1991 .

[21]  M. Manis,et al.  Judging psychopathology: Expectation and contrast , 1984 .

[22]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Superstars and me : Predicting the impact of role models on the self , 1997 .

[23]  M. Rosenberg.  Conceiving the self , 1979 .

[24]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. , 1996 .

[25]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Equal ratings but separate meanings: Stereotypes and the construal of traits. , 1997 .

[26]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[28]  Leonard L. Martin,et al.  Perceptions of unity and distinctiveness as determinants of attraction. , 1983 .

[29]  J. V. Wood,et al.  What is Social Comparison and How Should We Study it? , 1996 .

[30]  L. Ross,et al.  Hedonic consequences of social comparison: a contrast of happy and unhappy people. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  S. E. Taylor,et al.  Social comparison activity under threat: downward evaluation and upward contacts. , 1989, Psychological review.

[32]  C. Macrae,et al.  Stereotype activation and inhibition , 2013 .

[33]  J. Kulik,et al.  Affective Reactions to Social Comparison: The Effects of Relative Performance and Related Attributes Information about Another Person , 1997 .

[34]  D. Stapel,et al.  Priming and timing: a test of two perspectives , 1998 .

[35]  M. Leary,et al.  Selfhood : identity, esteem, regulation , 2019 .

[36]  J. Richards,et al.  When Gulliver travels : social context, psychological closeness, and self-appraisals , 1992 .

[37]  J. D. Campbell.  Similarity and uniqueness: the effects of attribute type, relevance, and individual differences in self-esteem and depression. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[38]  G. Daniel Lassiter,et al.  Affective expectations and information gain: Evidence for assimilation and contrast effects in affective experience. , 1999 .

[39]  Joop van der Pligt,et al.  Categories of Category Accessibility: The Impact of Trait Concept versus Exemplar Priming on Person Judgments ☆ , 1997 .

[40]  J. Pligt,et al.  The Referents of Trait Inferences: The Impact of Trait Concepts Versus Actor-Trait Links on Subsequent Judgments , 1996 .

[41]  H. Helson.  Adaptation-level theory : an experimental and systematic approach to behavior , 1964 .

[42]  D. Paulhus,et al.  The definition of self: Private and public self-evaluation management strategies. , 1983 .

[43]  D T Gilbert,et al.  When comparisons arise. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  Y. Trope.  Identification and Inferential Processes in Dispositional Attribution. , 1986 .

[45]  E. Higgins.  Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. , 1996 .

[46]  B. Pelham,et al.  The waxing and waning of the social self: Assimilation and contrast in social comparison. , 1995 .

[47]  J. Kulik,et al.  Stress, affiliation, and emotional contagion. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  Gordon B. Moskowitz,et al.  People as Flexible Interpreters: Evidence and Issues from Spontaneous Trait Inference , 1996 .

[49]  D. R. Lehman,et al.  Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. , 1996 .

[50]  E. Higgins,et al.  Do self-attributes form a cognitive structure? , 1988 .

[51]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  The affective consequences of social comparison: either direction has its ups and downs. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  R. Zajonc,et al.  Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[53]  A. Tesser.  Reproductions Supplied by Edrs Are the Best That Can Be Made * * from the Original Document. toward a Self-evaluation Maintenance Model of Social Behavior* , 2007 .

[54]  Jerry Suls,et al.  Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives , 1977 .

[55]  P. Herr,et al.  Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. , 1986 .

[56]  L. Aspinwall.  Future-oriented aspects of social comparisons: A framework for studying health-related comparison activity. , 1997 .

[57]  M. Brewer,et al.  Self-evaluation effects of interpersonal versus intergroup social comparison. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[58]  J. D. Campbell,et al.  Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[59]  P. Lewicki.  Nonconscious biasing effects of single instances on subsequent judgments. , 1985 .

[60]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  Correcting for Mood-Induced Bias in the Evaluation of Political Candidates: The Roles of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 1999 .