Computer-based testing of the modified essay question: the Singapore experience

Background: The modified essay question (MEQ), featuring an evolving case scenario, tests a candidate's problem-solving and reasoning ability, rather than mere factual recall. Although it is traditionally conducted as a pen-and-paper examination, our university has run the MEQ using computer-based testing (CBT) since 2003. Aims: We describe our experience with running the MEQ examination using the IVLE, or integrated virtual learning environment (https://ivle.nus.edu.sg), provide a blueprint for universities intending to conduct computer-based testing of the MEQ, and detail how our MEQ examination has evolved since its inception. Methods: An MEQ committee, comprising specialists in key disciplines from the departments of Medicine and Paediatrics, was formed. We utilized the IVLE, developed for our university in 1998, as the online platform on which we ran the MEQ. We calculated the number of man-hours (academic and support staff) required to run the MEQ examination, using either a computer-based or pen-and-paper format. Results: With the support of our university's information technology (IT) specialists, we have successfully run the MEQ examination online, twice a year, since 2003. Initially, we conducted the examination with short-answer questions only, but have since expanded the MEQ examination to include multiple-choice and extended matching questions. A total of 1268 man-hours was spent in preparing for, and running, the MEQ examination using CBT, compared to 236.5 man-hours to run it using a pen-and-paper format. Despite being more labour-intensive, our students and staff prefer CBT to the pen-and-paper format. Conclusions: The MEQ can be conducted using a computer-based testing scenario, which offers several advantages over a pen-and-paper format. We hope to increase the number of questions and incorporate audio and video files, featuring clinical vignettes, to the MEQ examination in the near future.

[1]  C Kreiter,et al.  The effects of testing in shifts on a clinical in‐course computerized exam , 2003, Medical education.

[2]  G. Feletti,et al.  Reliability and validity studies on modified essay questions. , 1980, Journal of medical education.

[3]  T. Wilkinson,et al.  Comprehensive undergraduate medical assessments improve prediction of clinical performance , 2004, Medical education.

[4]  H. K. RABINOWITZ The modified essay question: an evaluation of its use in a family medicine clerkship , 1987, Medical education.

[5]  J. Weinman A modified essay question evaluation of pre‐clinical teaching of communication skills , 1984, Medical education.

[6]  C E Engel,et al.  THE MODIFIED ESSAY QUESTION FOR TESTING PROBLEM‐SOLVING SKILLS , 1980, The Medical journal of Australia.

[7]  D. Newble,et al.  A comparison of multiple‐choice tests and free‐response tests in examinations of clinical competence , 1979, Medical education.

[8]  D N Hansen,et al.  Affective reactions toward computer-based intelligence testing. , 1973, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[9]  D B Swanson,et al.  Simulations in the United States Medical Licensing Examination™ (USMLE™) , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[10]  B. Bloom Taxonomy of educational objectives , 1956 .

[11]  M. Vrabel,et al.  Computerized Versus Paper‐and‐Pencil Testing Methods for a Nursing Certification Examination: A Review of the Literature , 2004, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[12]  Erle C H Lim,et al.  Computer-based versus pen-and-paper testing: students' perception. , 2006, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[13]  Modified essay question. , 1985, Physical therapy.

[14]  G I Feletti,et al.  Modified Essay Questions: are they worth the effort? , 1986, Medical education.

[15]  Alan C. Bugbee,et al.  The Equivalence of Paper-and-Pencil and Computer-Based Testing. , 1996 .

[16]  Thomas H. Parker,et al.  What is π , 1991 .

[17]  S Schultze-Mosgau,et al.  The concept of a clinical round as a virtual, interactive web-based, e-learning model for interdisciplinary teaching. , 2004, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[18]  J. Buckwalter,et al.  Use of an educational taxonomy for evaluation of cognitive performance. , 1981, Journal of medical education.

[19]  The cognitive structure of the modified essay question , 1982, Medical education.

[20]  Fong-Ming Shyu,et al.  A Problem-based e-Learning Prototype System for Clinical Medical Education , 2004, MedInfo.

[21]  C. Rick,et al.  The Reality of Virtual Learning for Nurses in the Largest Integrated Health Care System in the Nation , 2003, Nursing administration quarterly.

[22]  T. Lowe,et al.  Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. , 1999, Spine.

[23]  D. Newble,et al.  The validity and reliability of a new examination of the clinical competence of medical students , 1981, Medical education.