Monte Carlo simulations of new 2D ripple filters for particle therapy facilities

Abstract At particle therapy facilities with pencil beam scanning, the implementation of a ripple filter (RiFi) broadens the Bragg peak (BP), which leads to fewer energy steps from the accelerator required to obtain an homogeneous dose coverage of the planned target volume (PTV). At the Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg, Germany, a new second generation RiFi has been developed with two-dimensional groove structures. In this work we evaluate this new RiFi design. Methods: The Monte Carlo (MC) code SHIELD-HIT12A is used to determine the RiFi-induced inhomogeneities in the dose distribution for various ion types, initial particle energies and distances from the RiFi to the phantom surface as well as in the depth of the phantom. The beam delivery and monitor system (BAMS) used at Marburg, the Heidelberg Ionentherapiezentrum (HIT), Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Germany and the GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany is modeled and simulated. To evaluate the PTV dose coverage performance of the new RiFi design, the heavy ion treatment planning system TRiP98 is used for dose optimization. SHIELD-HIT12A is used to prepare the facility-specific physical dose kernels needed by TRiP, and for recalculating the physical dose distribution after TRiP optimization. Results: At short distances from the RiFi to the phantom surface fine structures in the dose distribution are observed. For various RiFis, ion types and initial particle energies the distance dmax at which maximum dose inhomogeneity occurs is found and an expression for dmax is deduced. The distance d0.01 at which the dose inhomogeneity is less than 1% is estimated and used as a threshold distance at which dose distributions are considered homogeneous. The MC data are found to agree with analytical expressions for dmax and d0.01; both are inversely related to the angular distribution. Increasing scatter from the beam delivery and monitoring system results in reduced dmax and d0.01. Furthermore, dmax and d0.01 are found to be proportional to the RiFi period λ. Conclusion: Our findings clearly indicate that the dose inhomogeneity induced by RiFis does not add uncertainties to the dose distribution in the clinical setting. The new RiFi design can be used in treatments to obtain homogeneous PTV dose coverage with fewer energy steps while improving lateral penumbra, thereby reducing the required treatment time.

[1]  Yoshiyuki Iwata,et al.  Performance of the NIRS fast scanning system for heavy-ion radiotherapy. , 2010, Medical physics.

[2]  A. Lühr,et al.  Stopping power for particle therapy: The generic library libdEdx and clinically relevant stopping-power ratios for light ions , 2012, International journal of radiation biology.

[3]  G Kraft,et al.  Design and construction of a ripple filter for a smoothed depth dose distribution in conformal particle therapy. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  O Jäkel,et al.  Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: physical beam model and dose optimization. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  H. Palmans,et al.  Dose response of alanine detectors irradiated with carbon ion beams. , 2011, Medical physics.

[6]  A. Lühr,et al.  Fluence correction factors and stopping power ratios for clinical ion beams , 2011, Acta oncologica.

[7]  Antony J Lomax,et al.  Emerging technologies in proton therapy , 2011, Acta oncologica.

[8]  Uli Weber,et al.  Comparison of Carbon Ions Versus Protons , 2009, Cancer journal.

[9]  J. Petersen,et al.  Comparison of optimized single and multifield irradiation plans of antiproton, proton and carbon ion beams. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  A. Lühr,et al.  Recent improvements in the SHIELD-HIT code , 2012, International journal of radiation biology.

[11]  A. Lühr,et al.  Optimizing SHIELD-HIT for carbon ion treatment , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  J. Petersen,et al.  Dose- and LET-painting with particle therapy , 2010, Acta oncologica.

[13]  M Scholz,et al.  Treatment planning for heavy-ion radiotherapy: calculation and optimization of biologically effective dose. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  V. Highland,et al.  Some Practical Remarks on Multiple Scattering , 1975 .

[15]  Simona Giordanengo,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations of ripple filters designed for proton and carbon ion beams in hadrontherapy with active scanning technique , 2008 .

[16]  B. S. Sørensen,et al.  A community call for a dedicated radiobiological research facility to support particle beam cancer therapy. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[17]  E Griesmayer,et al.  The status of MedAustron. , 2004, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.