Sparse optical microstimulation in barrel cortex drives learned behaviour in freely moving mice

Electrical microstimulation can establish causal links between the activity of groups of neurons and perceptual and cognitive functions. However, the number and identities of neurons microstimulated, as well as the number of action potentials evoked, are difficult to ascertain. To address these issues we introduced the light-gated algal channel channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) specifically into a small fraction of layer 2/3 neurons of the mouse primary somatosensory cortex. ChR2 photostimulation in vivo reliably generated stimulus-locked action potentials at frequencies up to 50 Hz. Here we show that naive mice readily learned to detect brief trains of action potentials (five light pulses, 1 ms, 20 Hz). After training, mice could detect a photostimulus firing a single action potential in approximately 300 neurons. Even fewer neurons (approximately 60) were required for longer stimuli (five action potentials, 250 ms). Our results show that perceptual decisions and learning can be driven by extremely brief epochs of cortical activity in a sparse subset of supragranular cortical pyramidal neurons.

[1]  W. Penfield,et al.  SOMATIC MOTOR AND SENSORY REPRESENTATION IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF MAN AS STUDIED BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION , 1937 .

[2]  J. B. Ranck,et al.  Which elements are excited in electrical stimulation of mammalian central nervous system: A review , 1975, Brain Research.

[3]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[4]  Robert C. Wolpert,et al.  A Review of the , 1985 .

[5]  William T. Newsome,et al.  Cortical microstimulation influences perceptual judgements of motion direction , 1990, Nature.

[6]  W. Newsome,et al.  Microstimulation in visual area MT: effects on direction discrimination performance , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  E. J. Tehovnik Electrical stimulation of neural tissue to evoke behavioral responses , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  D Kleinfeld,et al.  Central versus peripheral determinants of patterned spike activity in rat vibrissa cortex during whisking. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  R. Romo,et al.  Somatosensory discrimination based on cortical microstimulation , 1998, Nature.

[10]  M. Diamond,et al.  Population coding in somatosensory cortex , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  Winfried Denk,et al.  Targeted Whole-Cell Recordings in the Mammalian Brain In Vivo , 2003, Neuron.

[12]  Karel Svoboda,et al.  ScanImage: Flexible software for operating laser scanning microscopes , 2003, Biomedical engineering online.

[13]  M. DeWeese,et al.  Binary Spiking in Auditory Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Claus W Heizmann,et al.  Distinct migratory behavior of early‐ and late‐born neurons derived from the cortical ventricular zone , 2004, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Susana Q. Lima,et al.  Remote Control of Behavior through Genetically Targeted Photostimulation of Neurons , 2005, Cell.

[18]  H. Chiel,et al.  Fast noninvasive activation and inhibition of neural and network activity by vertebrate rhodopsin and green algae channelrhodopsin. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Light Activation of Channelrhodopsin-2 in Excitable Cells of Caenorhabditis elegans Triggers Rapid Behavioral Responses , 2005, Current Biology.

[20]  T. Ishizuka,et al.  Kinetic evaluation of photosensitivity in genetically engineered neurons expressing green algae light-gated channels , 2006, Neuroscience Research.

[21]  E. J. Tehovnik,et al.  Direct and indirect activation of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  J. Delgado-García,et al.  Microstimulation of the somatosensory cortex can substitute for vibrissa stimulation during Pavlovian conditioning. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  A. Dizhoor,et al.  Ectopic Expression of a Microbial-Type Rhodopsin Restores Visual Responses in Mice with Photoreceptor Degeneration , 2006, Neuron.

[24]  Karel Svoboda,et al.  Rapid Redistribution of Synaptic PSD-95 in the Neocortex In Vivo , 2006, PLoS biology.

[25]  C. Petersen,et al.  Visualizing the Cortical Representation of Whisker Touch: Voltage-Sensitive Dye Imaging in Freely Moving Mice , 2006, Neuron.

[26]  G. Nagel,et al.  Light-Induced Activation of Distinct Modulatory Neurons Triggers Appetitive or Aversive Learning in Drosophila Larvae , 2006, Current Biology.

[27]  W. C. Hall,et al.  High-speed mapping of synaptic connectivity using photostimulation in Channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Benjamin R. Arenkiel,et al.  In Vivo Light-Induced Activation of Neural Circuitry in Transgenic Mice Expressing Channelrhodopsin-2 , 2007, Neuron.

[29]  K. Svoboda,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2–assisted circuit mapping of long-range callosal projections , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Cornelius Schwarz,et al.  Detection psychophysics of intracortical microstimulation in rat primary somatosensory cortex , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[31]  T. Oertner,et al.  Optical induction of synaptic plasticity using a light-sensitive channel , 2007, Nature Methods.