Automation of the in vitro micronucleus and chromosome aberration assay for the assessment of the genotoxicity of the particulate and gas–vapor phase of cigarette smoke

Abstract Total particulate matter (TPM) and the gas–vapor phase (GVP) of mainstream smoke from the Reference Cigarette 3R4F were assayed in the cytokinesis-block in vitro micronucleus (MN) assay and the in vitro chromosome aberration (CA) assay, both using V79-4 Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts exposed for up to 24 h. The Metafer image analysis platform was adapted resulting in a fully automated evaluation system of the MN assay for the detection, identification and reporting of cells with micronuclei together with the determination of the cytokinesis-block proliferation index (CBPI) to quantify the treatment-related cytotoxicity. In the CA assay, the same platform was used to identify, map and retrieve metaphases for a subsequent CA evaluation by a trained evaluator. In both the assays, TPM and GVP provoked a significant genotoxic effect: up to 6-fold more micronucleated target cells than in the negative control and up to 10-fold increases in aberrant metaphases. Data variability was lower in the automated version of the MN assay than in the non-automated. It can be estimated that two test substances that differ in their genotoxicity by approximately 30% can statistically be distinguished in the automated MN and CA assays. Time savings, based on man hours, due to the automation were approximately 70% in the MN and 25% in the CA assays. The turn-around time of the evaluation phase could be shortened by 35 and 50%, respectively. Although only cigarette smoke-derived test material has been applied, the technical improvements should be of value for other test substances.

[1]  Sandrine Roch-Lefevre,et al.  Detection of Partial-Body Exposure to Ionizing Radiation by the Automatic Detection of Dicentrics , 2012, Radiation research.

[2]  J. Heddle,et al.  The production of micronuclei from chromosome aberrations in irradiated cultures of human lymphocytes. , 1976, Mutation research.

[3]  C. García-Cantón,et al.  Characterisation of an aerosol exposure system to evaluate the genotoxicity of whole mainstream cigarette smoke using the in vitro γH2AX assay by high content screening , 2014, BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology.

[4]  J. Xie,et al.  Evaluation method for the cytotoxicity of cigarette smoke by in vitro whole smoke exposure. , 2014, Experimental and toxicologic pathology : official journal of the Gesellschaft fur Toxikologische Pathologie.

[5]  M. Gaca,et al.  Real-time assessment of cigarette smoke particle deposition in vitro , 2012, Chemistry Central Journal.

[6]  C. Coggins,et al.  Toxicological assessment of cigarette ingredients. , 2011, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[7]  T. Lörch,et al.  New developments in automated cytogenetic imaging: unattended scoring of dicentric chromosomes, micronuclei, single cell gel electrophoresis, and fluorescence signals , 2004, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[8]  M. Gaca,et al.  Assessment of an in vitro whole cigarette smoke exposure system: The Borgwaldt RM20S 8-syringe smoking machine , 2011, Chemistry Central journal.

[9]  C. Meredith,et al.  The resolving power of in vitro genotoxicity assays for cigarette smoke particulate matter. , 2013, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[10]  J. Wishart.  Statistical tables , 2018, Global Education Monitoring Report.

[11]  International Conference on Harmonisation; guidance on S2(R1) Genotoxicity Testing and Data Interpretation for Pharmaceuticals intended for Human Use; availability. Notice. , 2012, Federal register.

[12]  Xianmao Luo,et al.  Genotoxic effect of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) on human diploid cell 2BS strain , 1990, Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology].

[13]  H. Witschi.  Carcinogenic activity of cigarette smoke gas phase and its modulation by beta-carotene and N-acetylcysteine. , 2005, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[14]  C. L. Gaworski,et al.  Toxicological evaluation of potassium sorbate added to cigarette tobacco. , 2008, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[15]  M. Scian,et al.  Characterization of a whole smoke in vitro exposure system (Burghart Mimic Smoker-01). , 2009, Inhalation toxicology.

[16]  Micheline Kirsch-Volders,et al.  Automated image analysis of micronuclei by IMSTAR for biomonitoring. , 2011, Mutagenesis.

[17]  C. Meredith,et al.  An inter-machine comparison of tobacco smoke particle deposition in vitro from six independent smoke exposure systems. , 2014, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[18]  C. Meredith,et al.  Assessment of cigarette smoke particle deposition within the Vitrocell® exposure module using quartz crystal microbalances , 2013, Chemistry Central Journal.

[19]  Masahiro Tanaka,et al.  In vitro micronucleus assay for cigarette smoke using a whole smoke exposure system: a comparison of smoking regimens. , 2010, Experimental and toxicologic pathology : official journal of the Gesellschaft fur Toxikologische Pathologie.

[20]  Hubert Thierens,et al.  Automated micronucleus (MN) scoring for population triage in case of large scale radiation events , 2010, International journal of radiation biology.

[21]  J F Barquinero,et al.  Automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes as a tool in large scale radiation accidents. , 2013, Mutation research.

[22]  S. Dertinger,et al.  Influence of aromatic hydrocarbon receptor-mediated events on the genotoxicity of cigarette smoke condensate. , 1998, Carcinogenesis.

[23]  S. Weber,et al.  Comet assay and air-liquid interface exposure system: a new combination to evaluate genotoxic effects of cigarette whole smoke in human lung cell lines. , 2013, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[24]  In vitro micronucleus assay for the analysis of total particulate matter in cigarette smoke: comparison of flow cytometry and laser scanning cytometry with microscopy. , 2013, Mutation research.

[25]  W. Pryor.  Cigarette smoke radicals and the role of free radicals in chemical carcinogenicity. , 1997, Environmental health perspectives.

[26]  Takemi Yoshida,et al.  Heme oxygenase-1 gene expression in human alveolar epithelial cells (A549) following exposure to whole cigarette smoke on a direct in vitro exposure system. , 2006, Experimental and toxicologic pathology : official journal of the Gesellschaft fur Toxikologische Pathologie.

[27]  J. Trosko,et al.  The Emperor Wears No Clothes in the Field of Carcinogen Risk Assessment: Ignored Concepts in Cancer Risk Assessment , 2005 .

[28]  P. Shields,et al.  Evaluation of In vitro Assays for Assessing the Toxicity of Cigarette Smoke and Smokeless Tobacco , 2009, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[29]  J. Trosko,et al.  A Paradigm Shift is Required for the Risk Assessment of Potential Human Health After Exposure to Low Level Chemical Exposures , 2010, International journal of toxicology.

[30]  T. Perfetti,et al.  The composition of cigarette smoke: a retrospective, with emphasis on polycyclic components , 2000, Human & experimental toxicology.

[31]  B. Bombick,et al.  Chemical and biological studies of a newCigarette that primarily heats tobacco. Part 2. In vitro toxicology of mainstreamsmoke condensate , 1998 .

[32]  Katie Smith,et al.  Reduction of misleading ("false") positive results in mammalian cell genotoxicity assays. I. Choice of cell type. , 2012, Mutation research.

[33]  M. Fenech.  The in vitro micronucleus technique. , 2000, Mutation research.

[34]  E. Roemer,et al.  The Addition of Cocoa, Glycerol, and Saccharose to the Tobacco of Cigarettes: Implications for Smoke Chemistry, In Vitro Cytotoxicity, Mutagenicity and Further Endpoints , 2010 .

[35]  C. Meredith,et al.  Characterisation of a Vitrocell® VC 10 in vitro smoke exposure system using dose tools and biological analysis , 2013, Chemistry Central Journal.

[36]  Aleksandra Fucic,et al.  Automated image analysis of cytokinesis-blocked micronuclei: an adapted protocol and a validated scoring procedure for biomonitoring. , 2008, Mutagenesis.

[37]  H. Haussmann,et al.  Discriminatory power of standard toxicity assays used to evaluate ingredients added to cigarettes. , 2012, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[38]  R. A. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Tables for Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research , 1956 .

[39]  E. Roemer,et al.  The mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase assay for the assessment and comparison of the mutagenic activity of cigarette mainstream smoke particulate phase. , 2006, Toxicology.

[40]  C. Rudd,et al.  Comparative studies on the genotoxic activity of mainstream smoke condensate from cigarettes which burn or only heat tobacco , 1990, Environmental and molecular mutagenesis.

[41]  D. Veltel,et al.  Evaluation of the potential effects of ingredients added to cigarettes. Part 3: in vitro genotoxicity and cytotoxicity. , 2002, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[42]  R. Baker,et al.  An overview of the effects of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry and toxicity. , 2004, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[43]  D. DeMarini,et al.  Genotoxicity of 10 cigarette smoke condensates in four test systems: comparisons between assays and condensates. , 2008, Mutation research.

[44]  B. Bombick,et al.  Chemical and biological studies of a new cigarette that primarily heats tobacco. Part 2. In vitro toxicology of mainstream smoke condensate. , 1998, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[45]  Eric Grégoire,et al.  Strategy for Population Triage Based on Dicentric Analysis , 2009, Radiation research.