Information Systems and Actor-Network Theory Analysis

Evidently, based on studies which have been conducted over the years, there exist lots more complexity than technical in the development and implementation of information systems in organisations. The complex issues are socio-technical in nature, which require a refresh examination, from social context, if different results are to be achieved. Some of the complexities which are encountered include operational issues, environmental trends, processes flow, communicative scheme, and actors' relationship. The unpredictable nature of business and rapidly changing user requirements makes it even more difficult to develop and implement systems within budget and timeframe. Other challenges are within the social context, such as politics and culture affiliations. Through the lens of Actor-Network Theory ANT understanding of the social context of how information systems are developed and implemented is gained. Although ANT has been employed in many studies, it is of significant important to establishes and clarifies the factors, from the social perspective, which influences the development and implementation of information systems in organisations.

[1]  T. Greenhalgh,et al.  Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory. , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[2]  Sridhar P. Nerur,et al.  Revolution or Evolution: A Comparison of Object-Oriented and Structured Systems Development Methods , 2001, MIS Q..

[3]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Contextual dynamics during health information systems implementation: an event-based actor-network approach , 2008, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Ricardo Gudwin Semiotics and Intelligent Systems Development : An Introduction , 2006 .

[5]  John W. Satzinger,et al.  Systems Analysis and Design in a Changing World , 2000 .

[6]  Tiko Iyamu Theoretical Analysis of Strategic Implementation of Enterprise Architecture , 2010, InnovaInt. J. Actor Netw. Theory Technol. Innov..

[7]  Chrystopher L. Nehaniv,et al.  Software Evolutionary Dynamics Modelled as the Activity of an Actor-Network , 2006, 2006 Second International IEEE Workshop on Software Evolvability (SE'06).

[8]  Rainer A. Sommer,et al.  Contracting for implementation of standard software , 2006, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[9]  Peter Krieg What Makes a Thinking Machine? Computational Semiotics And Semiotic Computation , 2007 .

[10]  Ping Gao,et al.  Using actor‐network theory to analyse strategy formulation , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[11]  Esselina Macome On implementation of an information system in the Mozambican context: The EDM case viewed through ANT lenses , 2008 .

[12]  Arthur Tatnall,et al.  An Actor-Network Analysis of a Case of Development and Implementation of IT Strategy , 2009, InnovaInt. J. Actor Netw. Theory Technol. Innov..

[13]  H. Frank Cervone,et al.  The system development life cycle and digital library development , 2007, OCLC Syst. Serv..

[14]  Petri Helo,et al.  A network approach to project business analysis , 2006 .

[15]  M. Callon,et al.  Некоторые элементы социологии перевода: приручение морских гребешков и рыболовов бухты Сен-Бриё , 2017 .

[16]  Keng Siau,et al.  Special Theme of Research in Information Systems Analysis and Design-IV Evaluation Criteria for Information Systems Development Methodologies , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  M. Callon Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[18]  Guido Capaldo,et al.  A planned-oriented approach for EPR implementation strategy selection , 2009, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[19]  Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua,et al.  Exhuming it Projects from Their Graves: An Analysis of Eight Failure Cases and Their Risk Factors , 2009, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[20]  C. Zhang,et al.  The Interpretive Flexibility of an E-government Project: From an Actor- Network Theory Perspective , 2009 .

[21]  Liza Potts,et al.  Using Actor Network Theory to Trace and Improve Multimodal Communication Design , 2009 .

[22]  John Shiga Ph.D. Candidate,et al.  Translations: Artifacts from an Actor-Network Perspective , 2007, Artifact.

[23]  Ante Bistričić The project information system , 2004 .

[24]  B. Williams-Jones,et al.  Actor-Network Theory: a tool to support ethical analysis of commercial genetic testing , 2003, New genetics and society.

[25]  Jerzy Jozefczyk,et al.  Knowledge-Based Intelligent System Advancements: Systemic and Cybernetic Approaches , 2010 .

[26]  Bill Doolin,et al.  To reveal is to critique: actor–network theory and critical information systems research , 2002, J. Inf. Technol..

[27]  Neil C. Ramiller,et al.  The element of surprise: appreciating the unexpected in (and through) actor networks , 2009, Inf. Technol. People.

[28]  Paula Kotzé,et al.  An overview of systems design and development methodologies with regard to the involvement of users and other stakeholders , 2003 .

[29]  Christopher J. Atkinson,et al.  The multidimensional systemic representation of actor networks: modelling breast cancer treatment decision-making , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[30]  Robert J. Vokurka,et al.  Process mapping in successful ERP implementations , 2004, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[31]  Tiko Iyamu,et al.  The Use of Structuration Theory and Actor Network Theory for Analysis: Case Study of a Financial Institution in South Africa , 2010, InnovaInt. J. Actor Netw. Theory Technol. Innov..

[32]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems (8th Edition) , 2006 .

[33]  Alexander Riegler,et al.  The arrival of the fittest: Evolution of novelty from a cybernetic perspective , 2010 .

[34]  Ramiro Montealegre,et al.  Trojan actor-networks and swift translation: Bringing actor-network theory to IT project escalation studies , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[35]  Marc Berg,et al.  Guest editors' introduction: Actor-network theory and information systems. What's so special? , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[36]  Richard A. Huff,et al.  Information Systems Project Management Decision Making: The Influence of Experience and Risk Propensity , 2008 .

[37]  Rashmi Jain,et al.  Rapid System Development (RSD) Methodologies: Proposing a Selection Framework , 2009 .

[38]  Lorna Uden,et al.  Actor-Network Theory for Service Innovation , 2009, InnovaInt. J. Actor Netw. Theory Technol. Innov..

[39]  Ari Paloviita,et al.  Actor‐networking stakeholder theory for today's corporate communications , 2010 .

[40]  David S. Preston,et al.  Information Systems Strategy: Reconceptualization, Measurement, and Implications , 2010, MIS Q..

[41]  Chuan-Hoo Tan,et al.  Teaching Information Systems Development via Process Variants , 2010, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[42]  Serkan Nalbant An Information System Proposal for Streamlining Software Development Process , 2003 .

[43]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Information systems evaluation and the information systems development process , 2004, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[44]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Boundary Objects with Agency: A Method for Studying the Design–Use Interface , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[45]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations , 2002, Inf. Soc..