Pathological gamblers discount probabilistic rewards less steeply than matched controls.

Nineteen treatment-seeking men meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (4th ed.) criteria for pathological gambling and 19 demographically matched controls participated. Participants provided demographic information, information about their recent drug use and gambling activities, and biological samples (to confirm drug abstinence). They also completed the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), and 2 questionnaires designed to separately quantify probability and delay discounting. Pathological gamblers discounted probabilistic rewards significantly less steeply than matched controls. A significant correlation revealed that more shallow probability discounting was associated with higher SOGS scores. Across groups, there was no significant difference in delay discounting, although this difference approached significance when education and ethnicity were included as covariates. These findings, collected for the 1st time with pathological gamblers, are consistent with previous reports that problem-gambling college students discount probabilistic rewards less steeply than controls. The nature of the relation between probability discounting and severity of problem gambling is deserving of further study.

[1]  A.,et al.  Self-control in the monkey Macacafascicularis , 2010 .

[2]  W. Bickel,et al.  Delay discounting and substance abuse-dependence. , 2010 .

[3]  J. Anker,et al.  Delay discounting as a predictor of drug abuse. , 2010 .

[4]  G. Madden,et al.  Impulsivity: The Behavioral and Neurological Science of Discounting , 2010 .

[5]  G. Madden,et al.  Discounting and Pathological Gambling , 2010 .

[6]  Christopher E. Bullock,et al.  Reinforcer accumulation in a token-reinforcement context with pigeons. , 2008, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  D. Hodgins,et al.  Probability discounting among gamblers: Differences across problem gambling severity and affect-regulation expectancies , 2008 .

[8]  K C Winters,et al.  DSM-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication , 2008, Psychological Medicine.

[9]  Elizabeth A. Olson,et al.  Adolescents' performance on delay and probability discounting tasks: contributions of age, intelligence, executive functioning, and self-reported externalizing behavior. , 2007, Personality and individual differences.

[10]  W. Bickel,et al.  Probability discounting among cigarette smokers and nonsmokers: molecular analysis discerns group differences , 2007, Behavioural pharmacology.

[11]  W. Bickel,et al.  Behavioral and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: competing neural systems and temporal discounting processes. , 2007, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[12]  G. Badger,et al.  Delay discounting predicts postpartum relapse to cigarette smoking among pregnant women. , 2007, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[13]  Carla H. Lagorio,et al.  Toward an Animal Model of Gambling: Delay Discounting and the Allure of Unpredictable Outcomes , 2007, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[14]  Jesse Dallery,et al.  Delay discounting predicts cigarette smoking in a laboratory model of abstinence reinforcement , 2007, Psychopharmacology.

[15]  J. MacKillop,et al.  Divergent Validity of Measures of Cognitive Distortions, Impulsivity, and Time Perspective in Pathological Gambling , 2006, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[16]  B. Grant,et al.  Comorbidity of DSM-IV pathological gambling and other psychiatric disorders: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. , 2005, The Journal of clinical psychiatry.

[17]  W. Woolverton,et al.  Effects of clomipramine on self-control choice in Lewis and Fischer 344 rats , 2005, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[18]  R. McCormick,et al.  Follow-up of male pathological gamblers after treatment: The relationship of intellectual variables to relapse , 1991, Journal of Gambling Studies.

[19]  Gregory J. Madden,et al.  Impulsivity (delay discounting) as a predictor of acquisition of IV cocaine self-administration in female rats , 2005, Psychopharmacology.

[20]  L. Green,et al.  A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. , 2004, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  Kris N Kirby,et al.  Heroin and cocaine abusers have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than alcoholics or non-drug-using controls. , 2004, Addiction.

[22]  M. Dixon,et al.  Delay discounting by pathological gamblers. , 2003, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[23]  S. M. Alessi,et al.  Pathological gambling severity is associated with impulsivity in a delay discounting procedure , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[24]  Daniel D. Holt,et al.  Is discounting impulsive? Evidence from temporal and probability discounting in gambling and non-gambling college students , 2003, Behavioural Processes.

[25]  Daniel D. Holt,et al.  Discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards: Processes and traits , 2003 .

[26]  N. Petry.  Pathological gamblers, with and without substance use disorders, discount delayed rewards at high rates. , 2001, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[27]  W. Bickel,et al.  Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes. , 2001, Addiction.

[28]  N. Petry.  Gambling problems in substance abusers are associated with increased sexual risk behaviors. , 2000, Addiction.

[29]  S. Mitchell,et al.  Measures of impulsivity in cigarette smokers and non-smokers , 1999, Psychopharmacology.

[30]  N. Petry,et al.  Excessive discounting of delayed rewards in substance abusers with gambling problems. , 1999, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[31]  W. Bickel,et al.  Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  L Green,et al.  Amount of reward has opposite effects on the discounting of delayed and probabilistic outcomes. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  J. May,et al.  Self-control in the monkeymacaca fascicularis , 1996 .

[34]  K. Kirby,et al.  Modeling Myopic Decisions: Evidence for Hyperbolic Delay-Discounting within Subjects and Amounts , 1995 .

[35]  Linda C. Sobell,et al.  Timeline Follow-Back A Technique for Assessing Self-Reported Alcohol Consumption , 1992 .

[36]  D. Cross,et al.  Subjective probability and delay. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[37]  H. Rachlin.  Why do People Gamble and Keep Gambling despite Heavy Losses? , 1990 .

[38]  M. Commons.  The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value , 2013 .

[39]  H. Lesieur,et al.  The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SaGS): A New Instrument for the Identification of Pathological Gamblers , 2010 .

[40]  J. E. Mazur.  An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. , 1987 .

[41]  F. J. Evans,et al.  New Data from the Addiction Severity Index Reliability and Validity in Three Centers , 1985, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[42]  H. Eysenck,et al.  Impulsiveness and Venturesomeness: Their Position in a Dimensional System of Personality Description , 1978, Psychological reports.