Direct estimate of the mutation rate and the distribution of fitness effects in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Estimates of the rate and frequency distribution of deleterious effects were obtained for the first time by direct scoring and characterization of individual mutations. This was achieved by applying tetrad analysis to a large number of yeast clones. The genomic rate of spontaneous mutation deleterious to a basic fitness-related trait, that of growth rate, was U = 1.1 x 10(-3) per diploid cell division. Extrapolated to the fruit fly and humans, the per generation rate would be 0.074 and 0.92, respectively. This is likely to be an underestimate because single mutations with selection coefficients s < 0.01 could not be detected. The distribution of s > or = 0.01 was studied both for spontaneous and induced mutations. The latter were induced by ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) or resulted from defective mismatch repair. Lethal changes accounted for approximately 30-40% of the scored mutations. The mean s of nonlethal mutations was fairly high, but most frequently its value was between 0.01 and 0.05. Although the rate and distribution of very small effects could not be determined, the joint share of such mutations in decreasing average fitness was probably no larger than approximately 1%.

[1]  A. D. Peters,et al.  High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1999, Science.

[2]  H. Muller THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE. , 1964, Mutation research.

[3]  C. López-Fanjul,et al.  Spontaneous mutational variances and covariances for fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1996, Genetics.

[4]  R. H.J.MULLE THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE , 2002 .

[5]  Jun Yu Li,et al.  On the experimental design and data analysis of mutation accumulation experiments. , 1999, Genetical research.

[6]  C. Zeyl,et al.  Estimates of the rate and distribution of fitness effects of spontaneous mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Genetics.

[7]  J. Lewtas,et al.  Mutagenicity of derivatives and metabolites of 1-nitropyrene: activation by rat liver S9 and bacterial enzymes. , 1984, Mutation research.

[8]  E S Lander,et al.  Ploidy regulation of gene expression. , 1999, Science.

[9]  J. Crow The origins, patterns and implications of human spontaneous mutation , 2000, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[10]  M. Lynch,et al.  MUTATION, SELECTION, AND THE MAINTENANCE OF LIFE‐HISTORY VARIATION IN A NATURAL POPULATION , 1998, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[11]  Nova Scotia ANTAGONISTIC PLEIOTROPY, DOMINANCE, AND GENETIC VARIATION* , 1982 .

[12]  S. Xu,et al.  Meiosis and the evolution of recombination at low mutation rates. , 2000, Genetics.

[13]  G. McVean,et al.  Inferring parameters of mutation, selection and demography from patterns of synonymous site evolution in Drosophila. , 2001, Genetics.

[14]  M. Kimura,et al.  The mutational load with epistatic gene interactions in fitness. , 1966, Genetics.

[15]  J. Crow,et al.  Haploidy or diploidy: which is better? , 1991, Nature.

[16]  A. Bateman THE VIABILITY OF NEAR-NORMAL IRRADIATED CHROMOSOMES , 1959 .

[17]  Frank Baganz,et al.  Suitability of replacement markers for functional analysis studies inSaccharomyces cerevisiae , 1997, Yeast.

[18]  Timothy B. Stockwell,et al.  The Sequence of the Human Genome , 2001, Science.

[19]  P. Keightley Nature of deleterious mutation load in Drosophila. , 1996, Genetics.

[20]  G. Marsischky,et al.  Redundancy of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MSH3 and MSH6 in MSH2-dependent mismatch repair. , 1996, Genes & development.

[21]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Science.

[22]  M. Lynch,et al.  MULLER'S RATCHET AND MUTATIONAL MELTDOWNS , 1993, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[23]  Peter D. Keightley,et al.  High genomic deleterious mutation rates in hominids , 1999, Nature.

[24]  A. Caballero,et al.  Properties of spontaneous mutations affecting quantitative traits. , 1999, Genetical research.

[25]  P. Keightley,et al.  Perspectives Anecdotal , Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics , 1999 .

[26]  R. Lande RISK OF POPULATION EXTINCTION FROM FIXATION OF NEW DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS , 1994, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[28]  J. Haber,et al.  Pleiotropic plasma membrane ATPase mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1987, Molecular and cellular biology.

[29]  P. Medawar UNSOLVED problem of biology. , 1953, The Medical journal of Australia.

[30]  J. Crow,et al.  Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1972, Genetics.

[31]  R. Reenan,et al.  Isolation and characterization of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes encoding homologs of the bacterial HexA and MutS mismatch repair proteins. , 1992, Genetics.

[32]  M. Lynch,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: SPONTANEOUS DELETERIOUS MUTATION , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  DELETERIOUS MUTATION AND THE EVOLUTION OF GENETIC LIFE CYCLES , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[34]  Michael Hampsey,et al.  A Review of Phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1997, Yeast.

[35]  R H Borts,et al.  Environmental stress and mutational load in diploid strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  R. Korona Unpredictable fitness transitions between haploid and diploid strains of the genetically loaded yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1999, Genetics.

[37]  R. Korona GENETIC LOAD OF THE YEAST SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE UNDER DIVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  P. Keightley,et al.  New estimates of the rates and effects of mildly deleterious mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  J. Drake Rates of spontaneous mutation among RNA viruses. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  R. Kolodner,et al.  Biochemistry and genetics of eukaryotic mismatch repair. , 1996, Genes & development.

[41]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Genetic loads and estimates of mutation rates in highly inbred plant populations , 1990, Nature.

[42]  M. Rose Antagonistic pleiotropy, dominance, and genetic variation1 , 1982, Heredity.

[43]  A. Kondrashov Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproduction , 1988, Nature.

[44]  M. Lynch,et al.  Estimation of deleterious-mutation parameters in natural populations. , 1996, Genetics.

[45]  R. Korona,et al.  Epistatic interactions of spontaneous mutations in haploid strains of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001 .

[46]  P. Keightley,et al.  Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. , 2000, Science.

[47]  A. Hinnen,et al.  Functional analysis of 150 deletion mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by a systematic approach , 1999, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[48]  N. Barton,et al.  A general model for the evolution of recombination. , 1995, Genetical research.

[49]  S. Shabalina,et al.  Rapid decline of fitness in panmictic populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under relaxed natural selection. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  M. Lynch,et al.  THE FITNESS EFFECTS OF SPONTANEOUS MUTATIONS IN CAENORHABDITIS ELEGANS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[51]  T. Prout,et al.  Antagonistic Pleiotropy, Reversal of Dominance, and Genetic Polymorphism , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[52]  P. Keightley,et al.  Genomic mutation rates for lifetime reproductive output and lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  M. Valero,et al.  Transition from haploidy to diploidy , 1991, Nature.

[54]  F B Christiansen,et al.  Evolution of recombination in a constant environment. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Whole-genome effects of ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutation on nine quantitative traits in outbred Drosophila melanogaster. , 2001, Genetics.

[56]  G. Sega A review of the genetic effects of ethyl methanesulfonate. , 1984, Mutation research.

[57]  P. Keightley The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1994, Genetics.

[58]  D Botstein,et al.  Functional Analysis of the Genes of Yeast Chromosome V by Genetic Footprinting , 1996, Science.

[59]  N. Morton,et al.  AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES. , 1956, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  T MUKAI,et al.  THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY. , 1964, Genetics.