Quantum formalism as an optimisation procedure of information flows for physical and biological systems

The similarities between biological and physical systems as respectively defined in quantum information biology (QIB) and in a Darwinian approach to quantum mechanics (DAQM) have been analysed. In both theories the processing of information is a central feature characterising the systems. The analysis highlights a mutual support on the thesis contended by each theory. On the one hand, DAQM provides a physical basis that might explain the key role played by quantum information at the macroscopic level for bio-systems in QIB. On the other hand, QIB offers the possibility, acting as a macroscopic testing ground, to analyse the emergence of quantumness from classicality in the terms held by DAQM. As an added result of the comparison, a tentative definition of quantum information in terms of classical information flows has been proposed. The quantum formalism would appear from this comparative analysis between QIB and DAQM as an optimal information scheme that would maximise the stability of biological and physical systems at any scale.

[1]  Sven Aerts,et al.  An Operational Characterization for Optimal Observation of Potential Properties in Quantum Theory and Signal Analysis , 2008 .

[2]  Dusko Pavlovic On quantum statistics in data analysis , 2008, ArXiv.

[3]  Johann Summhammer Maximum predictive power and the superposition principle , 1994 .

[4]  Sandu Popescu,et al.  A time-symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics , 2010 .

[5]  Peter W. Shor,et al.  Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer , 1995, SIAM Rev..

[6]  Eugene V. Koonin,et al.  Just how Lamarckian is CRISPR-Cas immunity: the continuum of evolvability mechanisms , 2016, Biology Direct.

[7]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  In defence of generalized Darwinism , 2008 .

[8]  S. Frank Natural selection maximizes Fisher information , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[9]  Caslav Brukner,et al.  OPERATIONALLY INVARIANT INFORMATION IN QUANTUM MEASUREMENTS , 1999 .

[10]  A. Turing On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem. , 1937 .

[11]  E. Koonin,et al.  Is evolution Darwinian or/and Lamarckian? , 2009, Biology Direct.

[12]  Thomas Miconi,et al.  Evolution and Complexity: The Double-Edged Sword , 2008, Artificial Life.

[13]  Charles H. Bennett Logical depth and physical complexity , 1988 .

[14]  D. Chalmers Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness , 1995 .

[15]  C. Baladrón Study on a Possible Darwinian Origin of Quantum Mechanics , 2011 .

[16]  B. Frieden,et al.  Lagrangians of physics and the game of Fisher-information transfer. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[17]  Patrick C. Fischer Turing machine , 2003 .

[18]  R. W. Burkhardt,et al.  Lamarck, Evolution, and the Inheritance of Acquired Characters , 2013, Genetics.

[19]  V. Ogryzko,et al.  Erwin Schroedinger, Francis Crick and epigenetic stability , 2007, Biology Direct.

[20]  Christopher G Timpson,et al.  Philosophical Aspects of Quantum Information Theory , 2006, quant-ph/0611187.

[21]  Vlatko Vedral,et al.  Quantum physics meets biology , 2009, HFSP journal.

[22]  Marcel Reginatto,et al.  Derivation of the equations of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics using the principle of minimum Fisher information , 1998 .

[23]  Eva Jablonka,et al.  Transgenerational Epigenetic Inheritance: Prevalence, Mechanisms, and Implications for the Study of Heredity and Evolution , 2009, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[24]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum Adaptivity in Biology: From Genetics to Cognition , 2015, Springer Netherlands.

[25]  Gregory Chaitin,et al.  Life as Evolving Software , 2012 .

[26]  W. Zurek Quantum Darwinism , 2009, 0903.5082.

[27]  Gerhard Grössing,et al.  Sub-Quantum Thermodynamics as a Basis of Emergent Quantum Mechanics , 2010, Entropy.

[28]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Quantum-like model for the adaptive dynamics of the genetic regulation of E. coli’s metabolism of glucose/lactose , 2012, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[29]  Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano,et al.  Operational axioms for a C*-algebraic formulation of Quantum Mechanics , 2007, quant-ph/0701219.

[30]  C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al.  The geometry of information retrieval , 2004 .

[31]  Christoph Adami,et al.  Sequence complexity in Darwinian evolution , 2002, Complex..

[32]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum Information Biology: From Information Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics to Applications in Molecular Biology and Cognitive Psychology , 2015, Foundations of Physics.

[33]  Johann Summhammer Quantum Theory as Efficient Representation of Probabilistic Information , 2007 .

[34]  Carlos Baladrón Quantumness To Survive In An Evolutionary Environment , 2011 .

[35]  D. Deutsch Quantum theory, the Church–Turing principle and the universal quantum computer , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[36]  C. Adami,et al.  Evolution of Biological Complexity , 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[37]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  A model of epigenetic evolution based on theory of open quantum systems , 2013, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[38]  J. Wheeler Information, physics, quantum: the search for links , 1999 .

[39]  Krishnendu Chatterjee,et al.  The time scale of evolutionary trajectories , 2014 .

[40]  Jean Baptiste,et al.  Philosophie Zoologique: Ou, Exposition des Considérations Relatives à L'Histoire Naturelle des Animaux , 2011 .

[41]  Carlos Baladrón Elements for the Development of a Darwinian Scheme Leading to Quantum Mechanics , 2015 .

[42]  Siegfried Fussy,et al.  Emergence and collapse of quantum mechanical superposition: Orthogonality of reversible dynamics and irreversible diffusion , 2010 .

[43]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[44]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance , 2010 .

[45]  Kristel Michielsen,et al.  Quantum theory as a description of robust experiments: Derivation of the Pauli equation , 2015, 1504.04944.

[46]  Eva Jablonka,et al.  Transformations of Lamarckism: From Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology , 2011 .

[47]  Nihat Ay,et al.  Effective Complexity and Its Relation to Logical Depth , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[48]  Carlos Baladrón In search of the adaptive foundations of quantum mechanics , 2010 .

[49]  Sheldon Goldstein,et al.  Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Information , 2009, 0907.2427.

[50]  B. Roy Frieden,et al.  Fisher information as the basis for the Schrödinger wave equation , 1989 .

[51]  Joshua A. Slater,et al.  An experimental test of all theories with predictive power beyond quantum theory , 2011, 1105.0133.

[52]  L. Smolin The status of cosmological natural selection , 2006, hep-th/0612185.

[53]  Andrei Khrennikov Born's rule from classical random fields , 2008 .

[54]  M. Katsnelson,et al.  Quantum theory as the most robust description of reproducible experiments: application to a rigid linear rotator , 2013, Optics & Photonics - Optical Engineering + Applications.

[55]  C. Fuchs,et al.  Quantum probabilities as Bayesian probabilities , 2001, quant-ph/0106133.

[56]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A quantum probability explanation for violations of ‘rational’ decision theory , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[57]  Eugene V. Koonin,et al.  Evolution of microbes and viruses: a paradigm shift in evolutionary biology? , 2012, Front. Cell. Inf. Microbio..