Spherical regression models with general covariates and anisotropic errors

Existing parametric regression models in the literature for response data on the unit sphere assume that the covariates have particularly simple structure, for example that they are either scalar or are themselves on the unit sphere, and/or that the error distribution is isotropic. In many practical situations, such models are too inflexible. Here, we develop richer parametric spherical regression models in which the covariates can have quite general structure (for example, they may be on the unit sphere, in Euclidean space, categorical or some combination of these) and in which the errors are anisotropic. We consider two anisotropic error distributions—the Kent distribution and the elliptically symmetric angular Gaussian distribution—and two parametrisations of each which enable distinct ways to model how the response depends on the covariates. Various hypotheses of interest, such as the significance of particular covariates, or anisotropy of the errors, are easy to test, for example by classical likelihood ratio tests. We also introduce new model-based residuals for evaluating the fitted models. In the examples we consider, the hypothesis tests indicate strong evidence to favour the novel models over simpler existing ones.

[1]  C. Taylor,et al.  Nonparametric Regression for Spherical Data , 2014 .

[2]  Michail Tsagris,et al.  An elliptically symmetric angular Gaussian distribution , 2018, Stat. Comput..

[3]  Peter E. Jupp,et al.  Residuals for directional data , 1988 .

[4]  Alan J. Lee,et al.  Regression Models for an Angular Response , 1992 .

[5]  Ramon C. Littell,et al.  Projected multivariate linear models for directional data , 1998 .

[6]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Spherical Regression Models Using Projective Linear Transformations , 2014 .

[7]  David B. Dunson,et al.  Extrinsic Local Regression on Manifold-Valued Data , 2015, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[8]  Tomonari Sei,et al.  On the exact maximum likelihood inference of Fisher–Bingham distributions using an adjusted holonomic gradient method , 2018, Stat. Comput..

[9]  Alan H. Welsh,et al.  Regression for compositional data by using distributions defined on the hypersphere , 2011 .

[10]  Christophe Ley,et al.  Modern Directional Statistics , 2017 .

[11]  J. Kent The Fisher‐Bingham Distribution on the Sphere , 1982 .

[12]  Hongtu Zhu,et al.  Regression models on Riemannian symmetric spaces , 2017, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology.

[13]  Andrew T. A. Wood,et al.  Saddlepoint approximations for the normalizing constant of Fisher--Bingham distributions on products of spheres and Stiefel manifolds , 2013 .

[14]  Louis-Paul Rivest,et al.  Spherical regression for concentrated Fisher-von Mises distributions , 1989 .

[15]  Kanti V. Mardia,et al.  A New Unified Approach for the Simulation of a Wide Class of Directional Distributions , 2018 .

[16]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Directional data analysis under the general projected normal distribution. , 2013, Statistical methodology.

[17]  Aleix M. Martínez,et al.  Spherical-Homoscedastic Distributions: The Equivalency of Spherical and Normal Distributions in Classification , 2007, J. Mach. Learn. Res..