‘Real‐world’ compensatory behaviour with low nicotine concentration e‐liquid: subjective effects and nicotine, acrolein and formaldehyde exposure

Abstract Aims To compare the effects of (i) high versus low nicotine concentration e‐liquid, (ii) fixed versus adjustable power and (iii) the interaction between the two on: (a) vaping behaviour, (b) subjective effects, (c) nicotine intake and (d) exposure to acrolein and formaldehyde in e‐cigarette users vaping in their everyday setting. Design Counterbalanced, repeated measures with four conditions: (i) low nicotine (6 mg/ml)/fixed power; (ii) low nicotine/adjustable power; (iii) high nicotine (18 mg/ml)/fixed power; and (iv) high nicotine/adjustable power. Setting London and the South East, England. Participants Twenty experienced e‐cigarette users (recruited between September 2016 and February 2017) vaped ad libitum using an eVic Supreme™ with a ‘Nautilus Aspire’ tank over 4 weeks (1 week per condition). Measurements Puffing patterns [daily puff number (PN), puff duration (PD), interpuff interval (IPI)], ml of e‐liquid consumed, changes to power (where permitted) and subjective effects (urge to vape, nicotine withdrawal symptoms) were measured in each condition. Nicotine intake was measured via salivary cotinine. 3‐Hydroxypropylmercapturic acid (3‐HPMA), a metabolite of the toxicant acrolein, and formate, a metabolite of the carcinogen formaldehyde, were measured in urine. Findings There was a significant nicotine concentration × power interaction for PD (P < 0.01). PD was longer with low nicotine/fixed power compared with (i) high nicotine/fixed power (P < 0.001) and (ii) low nicotine/adjustable power (P < 0.01). PN and liquid consumed were higher in the low versus high nicotine condition (main effect of nicotine, P < 0.05). Urge to vape and withdrawal symptoms were lower, and nicotine intake was higher, in the high nicotine condition (main effects of nicotine: P < 0.01). While acrolein levels did not differ, there was a significant nicotine × power interaction for formaldehyde (P < 0.05). Conclusions Use of a lower nicotine concentration e‐liquid may be associated with compensatory behaviour (e.g. higher number and duration of puffs) and increases in negative affect, urge to vape and formaldehyde exposure.

[1]  K. Farsalinos,et al.  Changes in Puffing Topography and Nicotine Consumption Depending on the Power Setting of Electronic Cigarettes , 2018, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[2]  L. Kośmider,et al.  Compensatory Puffing With Lower Nicotine Concentration E-liquids Increases Carbonyl Exposure in E-cigarette Aerosols , 2018, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[3]  Shu-Hong Zhu,et al.  E-cigarette use and associated changes in population smoking cessation: evidence from US current population surveys , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[4]  R. West,et al.  Nicotine, Carcinogen, and Toxin Exposure in Long-Term E-Cigarette and Nicotine Replacement Therapy Users , 2017, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[5]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Exposure to Nicotine and Selected Toxicants in Cigarette Smokers Who Switched to Electronic Cigarettes: A Longitudinal Within-Subjects Observational Study , 2017, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[6]  H. McRobbie,et al.  Nicotine delivery to users from cigarettes and from different types of e-cigarettes , 2017, Psychopharmacology.

[7]  H. McRobbie,et al.  E-cigarette puffing patterns associated with high and low nicotine e-liquid strength: effects on toxicant and carcinogen exposure , 2016, BMC Public Health.

[8]  C. Feyerabend,et al.  Self-titration by experienced e-cigarette users: blood nicotine delivery and subjective effects , 2016, Psychopharmacology.

[9]  E. Soule,et al.  Effects of Electronic Cigarette Liquid Nicotine Concentration on Plasma Nicotine and Puff Topography in Tobacco Cigarette Smokers: A Preliminary Report. , 2016, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[10]  J. Etter.  A longitudinal study of cotinine in long-term daily users of e-cigarettes. , 2016, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[11]  Katie Myers Smith,et al.  Effects of Switching to Electronic Cigarettes with and without Concurrent Smoking on Exposure to Nicotine, Carbon Monoxide, and Acrolein , 2015, Cancer Prevention Research.

[12]  A. Breland,et al.  Electronic cigarette nicotine delivery can exceed that of combustible cigarettes: a preliminary report , 2015, Tobacco Control.

[13]  Delshanee Kotandeniya,et al.  Evaluation of toxicant and carcinogen metabolites in the urine of e-cigarette users versus cigarette smokers. , 2015, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[14]  Jessica M Yingst,et al.  Development of a questionnaire for assessing dependence on electronic cigarettes among a large sample of ex-smoking E-cigarette users. , 2015, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[15]  N. Saliba,et al.  Effects of user puff topography, device voltage, and liquid nicotine concentration on electronic cigarette nicotine yield: measurements and model predictions. , 2015, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[16]  G. Scherer,et al.  Smoking behaviour and compensation: a review of the literature with meta-analysis. , 2014, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[17]  C. Bullen,et al.  Electronic Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation , 2014, Current Cardiology Reports.

[18]  Andrzej Sobczak,et al.  Carbonyl compounds in electronic cigarette vapors: effects of nicotine solvent and battery output voltage. , 2014, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[19]  S. Michie,et al.  Real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes when used to aid smoking cessation: a cross-sectional population study , 2014, BDJ.

[20]  C. Vardavas,et al.  Determinants and prevalence of e-cigarette use throughout the European Union: a secondary analysis of 26 566 youth and adults from 27 Countries , 2014, Tobacco Control.

[21]  K. Farsalinos,et al.  Nicotine absorption from electronic cigarette use: comparison between first and new-generation devices , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[22]  L. Dawkins,et al.  Acute electronic cigarette use: nicotine delivery and subjective effects in regular users , 2013, Psychopharmacology.

[23]  K. Farsalinos,et al.  Evaluating Nicotine Levels Selection and Patterns of Electronic Cigarette Use in a Group of “Vapers” Who Had Achieved Complete Substitution of Smoking , 2013, Substance abuse : research and treatment.

[24]  N. Benowitz,et al.  Interlaboratory comparability of serum cotinine measurements at smoker and nonsmoker concentration levels: a round-robin study. , 2009, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[25]  David Hammond,et al.  Smoking Topography, Brand Switching, and Nicotine Delivery: Results from an In vivo Study , 2005, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[26]  R. West,et al.  Evaluation of the mood and physical symptoms scale (MPSS) to assess cigarette withdrawal , 2004, Psychopharmacology.

[27]  M. Russell.  Nicotine intake and its regulation. , 1980, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[28]  H. Ashton,et al.  Self-titration by cigarette smokers , 1979, British medical journal.

[29]  C. Feyerabend,et al.  Plasma nicotine levels after smoking cigarettes with high, medium, and low nicotine yields. , 1975, British medical journal.

[30]  H. Ashton,et al.  Puffing Frequency and Nicotine Intake in Cigarette Smokers , 1970, British medical journal.