Delay to formalin fixation ‘cold ischemia time’: effect on ERBB2 detection by in-situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry

The American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists ERBB2 testing guidelines address several pre-analytical variables known to affect ERBB2 testing accuracy. According to 2010 updated guidelines, the pre-analytical variable of time to tissue fixation (cold ischemia time) should be kept to <1 h, however, little has been published about cold ischemia time and its significance in ERBB2 testing. To that end, this study evaluated ERBB2 status using two different FDA-approved in-situ hybridization methods and an FDA-approved immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay in the largest cohort to date (n=84) of invasive breast carcinomas with tracked cold ischemia time. Cold ischemia time was stratified into four groups (<1 h (n=45), 1–2 h (n=27), 2–3 h (n=6), and >3 h (n=6)) and ERBB2 status was evaluated in each group by IHC (4B5) and by in-situ hybridization methodologies (PathVysion® fluorescence in situ hybridization and the INFORM HER2® dual in situ DNA probe assay). Both in-situ hybridization methods were evaluated using three ERBB2 scoring criteria (dual-probe guidelines, single-probe guidelines, and the FDA package insert scoring instructions). Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) and INFORM HER2® demonstrated 100% concordance in the detection of ERBB2 amplification by all three scoring guidelines at all cold ischemia time points. Agreement between in-situ hybridization methodologies and IHC was superior using single-probe guidelines compared with dual probe or FDA scoring instructions. In addition, Inform HER2® in-situ hybridization signals were significantly more intense than FISH at all cold ischemia time points, however, no significant loss of either chromosome 17 or ERBB2 signal was detected by FISH or Inform HER2® in-situ hybridization in cold ischemia times up to 3 h. On the basis of our findings, cold ischemia time up to 3 h has no deleterious effect on the detection of ERBB2 via in-situ hybridization or IHC.

[1]  D. Hicks,et al.  Breast cancer predictive factor testing: the challenges and importance of standardizing tissue handling. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[2]  S. Edge,et al.  HER2 Testing: How to Reach a High Concordance Rate Between Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization , 2011, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[3]  T. Fleming,et al.  Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  L. Layfield,et al.  Effects of Fixative and Fixation Protocols on Assessment of Her-2/neu Oncogene Amplification Status by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization , 2007, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[5]  M. Millward,et al.  Cost Effectiveness of Trastuzumab in the Adjuvant Treatment of Early Breast Cancer , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[6]  Anthony Rhodes,et al.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. , 2007, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[7]  G. Wilding,et al.  Delay to formalin fixation effect on breast biomarkers , 2009, Modern Pathology.

[8]  Thomas J. Smith,et al.  Do the large benefits justify the large costs of adjuvant breast cancer trastuzumab? , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  G. Barosi,et al.  Cost effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  N. Moatamed,et al.  The effect of delay in fixation, different fixatives, and duration of fixation in estrogen and progesterone receptor results in breast carcinoma. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[11]  P. Tan,et al.  Effect of Fixation Period on HER2/neu Gene Amplification Detected by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Invasive Breast Carcinoma , 2002, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[12]  A. Gown,et al.  Fixation time does not affect expression of HER2/neu. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[13]  E. Winer,et al.  Cardiac safety analysis of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with or without trastuzumab in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 adjuvant breast cancer trial. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  C. Stewart,et al.  Discrepancy in ER levels of breast carcinoma in biopsy vs mastectomy specimens , 1985, Journal of surgical oncology.

[15]  David Y. Lu,et al.  Effect of ischemic time, fixation time, and fixative type on HER2/neu immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridization results in breast cancer. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[16]  L. Rogers,et al.  Fixation time does not affect expression of HER2/neu: a pilot study. , 2010, American journal of clinical pathology.

[17]  Greg Yothers,et al.  Assessment of cardiac dysfunction in a randomized trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel, with or without trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy in node-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-overexpressing breast cancer: NSABP B-31. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  A. Chaudhuri,et al.  HER2 Status and Benefit from Adjuvant Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer , 2008 .

[19]  L. Goldstein,et al.  High concordance between immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization testing for HER2 status in breast cancer requires a normalized IHC scoring system , 2008, Modern Pathology.

[20]  D. Dabbs,et al.  Fixation time does not affect the expression of estrogen receptor. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.

[21]  M. Sliwkowski,et al.  Inhibitory effects of combinations of HER-2/neu antibody and chemotherapeutic agents used for treatment of human breast cancers , 1999, Oncogene.

[22]  R. Finn,et al.  Remission of human breast cancer xenografts on therapy with humanized monoclonal antibody to HER-2 receptor and DNA-reactive drugs , 1998, Oncogene.

[23]  L. Norton,et al.  Recombinant humanized anti-HER2 antibody (Herceptin) enhances the antitumor activity of paclitaxel and doxorubicin against HER2/neu overexpressing human breast cancer xenografts. , 1998, Cancer research.

[24]  D. Lake,et al.  The safety of dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with trastuzumab in HER-2/neu overexpressed/amplified breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  A. Gown Current issues in ER and HER2 testing by IHC in breast cancer , 2008, Modern Pathology.

[26]  D. Arber Effect of Prolonged Formalin Fixation on the Immunohistochemical Reactivity of Breast Markers , 2002, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.