The Paradox of Post-Acquisition IS Integration Preparation: Preparing Under Incomplete Information

In this paper, we propose the paradox of preparation as a salient dilemma facing IT organizations in firms anticipating acquisitions or acquisition activity. The paradox of preparation originates in the need to start preparations for post-acquisition IS integration long before the legal combination is concluded, and the contradictory observation that only after the deal is concluded will it be known to the acquirer what they should have prepared for. Based on an in-depth, explorative study of how a large multi-national company prepared for an anticipated and later enacted acquisition with another large multi-national company, we develop a process theory depicting how this paradoxical tension impacts IS integration preparation activities in the period leading up to the acquisition. Initially, preparations are based on assumptions about the future challenge. As assumptions are confirmed or rejected, focus of preparation activities are recurrently revised. To handle uncertainty of assumptions, the firm actively considered the scope of possibilities and the universality of activities to manage the paradox of preparation.

[1]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  How Cisco Systems Used Enterprise Architecture Capability to Sustain Acquisition-Based Growth , 2015, MIS Q. Executive.

[2]  Jan Marco Leimeister,et al.  A Dual View on IT Challenges in Corporate Divestments and Acquisitions , 2011, ICIS.

[3]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  When IT capabilities are not scale-free in merger and acquisition integrations: how do capital markets react to IT capability asymmetries between acquirer and target? , 2015, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Strategic Alignment In Mergers And Acquisitions: Theorizing IS Integration Decision making , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[5]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Explaining Development and Change in Organizations , 1995 .

[6]  Stefan Henningsson,et al.  Learning to acquire: how serial acquirers build organisational knowledge for information systems integration , 2015, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Ton Spil,et al.  Post-merger IT integration strategies: An IT alignment perspective , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[8]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure , 1995 .

[9]  Antonis C. Stylianou,et al.  Corporate mergers and the problems of IS integration , 1996, Inf. Manag..

[10]  Stefan Henningsson,et al.  "Ready to Acquire": The IT Resources Required for a Growth-by-Acquisition Business Strategy , 2013, MIS Q. Executive.

[11]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[12]  Yasmin Merali,et al.  The strategic positioning of information systems in post-acquisition management , 1993, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Barbara Pernici,et al.  Information systems integration in mergers and acquisitions: A normative model , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[14]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[15]  Peter J. Wynne,et al.  Developing Acquisition IS Integration Capabilities: The Learning Processes of Novice Acquirers , 2016 .

[16]  Allen S. Lee Retrospect and prospect: information systems research in the last and next 25 years , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[17]  Stefan Henningsson,et al.  Taking Stock and looking Forward: a scientometric Analysis of is/IT Integration Challenges in Mergers , 2014, ECIS.

[18]  Stefan Henningsson,et al.  An approach to analyzing and planning post-merger IS integration: Insights from two field studies , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[19]  Philip Yetton,et al.  Integrating information technology divisions in a bank merger Fit, compatibility and models of change , 1996, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Johnny Saldaña,et al.  The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers , 2009 .

[21]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  Cross-Business Information Technology Integration and Acquirer Value Creation in Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..