Why Do You Need This?: Selective Disclosure of Data Among Citizen Scientists

Recent scandals involving data from participatory research have contributed to broader public concern about online privacy. Such concerns might make people more reluctant to participate in research that asks them to volunteer personal data, compromising many researchers' data collection. We tested several motivational messages that encouraged participation in a citizen science project. We measured people's willingness to disclose personal information. While participants were less likely to share sensitive data than neutral data, disclosure behaviour was not affected by attitudes to privacy. Importantly, we found that citizen scientists who were exposed to a motivational message that emphasised 'learning' were more likely to share sensitive information than those presented with other types of motivational cues. Our results suggest that priming individuals with motivational messages can increase their willingness to contribute personal data to a project, even if the request pertains to sensitive information.

[1]  A. Schuit,et al.  Public health citizen science; perceived impacts on citizen scientists: A case study in a low-income neighbourhood in the Netherlands , 2017 .

[2]  M. Angela Sasse,et al.  Would You Sell Your Mother's Data? Personal Data Disclosure in a Simulated Credit Card Application , 2012, WEIS.

[3]  Margret C. Domroese,et al.  Why watch bees? Motivations of citizen science volunteers in the Great Pollinator Project , 2017 .

[4]  Michael Hoerger,et al.  Participant Dropout as a Function of Survey Length in Internet-Mediated University Studies: Implications for Study Design and Voluntary Participation in Psychological Research , 2010, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[5]  J. Horne,et al.  A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. , 1976, International journal of chronobiology.

[6]  Daniel R. Horne,et al.  The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors , 2007 .

[7]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Would a Privacy Fundamentalist Sell Their DNA for $1000 ... If Nothing Bad Happened as a Result? The Westin Categories, Behavioral Intentions, and Consequences , 2014, SOUPS.

[8]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Accounting for Privacy in Citizen Science: Ethical Research in a Context of Openness , 2017, CSCW.

[9]  Schade Sven,et al.  Survey report: data management in Citizen Science projects , 2016 .

[10]  Spyros Kokolakis,et al.  Privacy attitudes and privacy behaviour: A review of current research on the privacy paradox phenomenon , 2017, Comput. Secur..

[11]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Sensr: evaluating a flexible framework for authoring mobile data-collection tools for citizen science , 2013, CSCW.

[12]  Anna L. Cox,et al.  Exploring Citizen Psych-Science and the Motivations of Errordiary Volunteers , 2014, Hum. Comput..

[13]  Anna L. Cox,et al.  Exploring the effects of non-monetary reimbursement for participants in HCI research , 2017, Hum. Comput..

[14]  Matthew Crain,et al.  The limits of transparency: Data brokers and commodification , 2018, New Media Soc..

[15]  Sören Preibusch,et al.  Unwillingness to Pay for Privacy: A Field Experiment , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  S. Mourato,et al.  Happiness is greater in natural environments , 2013 .

[17]  R. Bonney,et al.  Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy , 2009 .

[18]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Sharing data while protecting privacy in citizen science , 2014, INTR.

[19]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Designing for dabblers and deterring drop-outs in citizen science , 2014, CHI.

[20]  Katharina Reinecke,et al.  LabintheWild: Conducting Large-Scale Online Experiments With Uncompensated Samples , 2015, CSCW.

[21]  Kok-Leong Ong,et al.  2Loud?: Community mapping of exposure to traffic noise with mobile phones , 2014, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[22]  Carsten S. Østerlund,et al.  Recruiting Messages Matter: Message Strategies to Attract Citizen Scientists , 2017, CSCW Companion.

[23]  David De Roure,et al.  Zooniverse: observing the world's largest citizen science platform , 2014, WWW.

[24]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Citizen Science: New Research Challenges for Human–Computer Interaction , 2016, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  M. Schraefel,et al.  “Now that you mention it”: A survey experiment on information, inattention and online privacy , 2017 .

[26]  Shinnosuke Nakayama,et al.  Social signals as design interventions for enhancing citizen science contributions* , 2018 .

[27]  Brian L. Sullivan,et al.  eBird: A citizen-based bird observation network in the biological sciences , 2009 .

[28]  J. Silvertown A new dawn for citizen science. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[29]  Zhenhui Jiang,et al.  Research Note - Privacy Concerns and Privacy-Protective Behavior in Synchronous Online Social Interactions , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..