Assessing Performance of Awacs Command and Control Teams

Performance constructs are discussed within the context of complex and dynamic command and control (C2) team performance. Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) team members function in an information-rich environment, exchanging updates through an array of visual displays and communication channels. In combat, they face challenges of limited resources, ambiguous information, time pressure, and enemy interference. Subsequently, accurate assessment of communication, coordination, and decision making in AWACS teams can be difficult and time-consuming. Theoretical predictions arising from laboratory tasks must ultimately face the test of external validity using criterion measures of performance. This paper describes some of the challenges in developing criterion measures of performance and situation assessment within a dynamic and complex task requiring high expertise and teamwork. Results from two studies are briefly described.

[1]  E. Salas,et al.  How can you turn a team of experts into an expert team?: Emerging Training Strategies , 1997 .

[2]  D. P. Baker,et al.  Measuring the Importance of Teamwork: The Reliability and Validity of Job/Task Analysis Indices for Team-Training Design , 1994 .

[3]  L. James Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[4]  Douglas R. Eddy,et al.  AIRCREW EVALUATION SUSTAINED OPERATIONS PERFORMANCE (AESOP): A Triservice Facility for Technology Transition , 1990 .

[5]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Multilevel theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed expertise. , 1995 .

[6]  E. Salas,et al.  Military Team Research: 10 Years of Progress , 1995 .

[7]  Douglas R Eddy,et al.  Selected Team Performance Measures in a C3 Environment. An Annotated Bibliography , 1989 .

[8]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Repeated measures regression and mediational tests: Enhancing the power of leadership research , 1994 .

[9]  E. Salas,et al.  Games teams play: A method for investigating team coordination and performance , 1992 .

[10]  William B. Rouse,et al.  The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[11]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Situation Awareness in Team Performance: Implications for Measurement and Training , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[12]  D. Rousseau Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. , 1985 .

[13]  R. Saavedra,et al.  Complex interdependence in task-performing groups , 1993 .

[14]  Norman E. Lane,et al.  Improving the Measurement of Team Performance: The TARGETs Methodology , 1994 .

[15]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. , 1990 .

[16]  Donald A. Rock,et al.  Development of a Small-Group Team Performance Taxonomy Based on Meta-Analysis. , 1987 .