Examining the Influence of External Stakeholders on IT Governance: Perceptions of IT Executives

Information Technology (IT) governance decisions usually involve several stakeholders with divergent claims. Past research on IT governance focused on internal stakeholders' responsibilities and roles in IT governance decisions. However, we don’t know much about external stakeholders’ place in IT governance. Based on stakeholder theory, a qualitative research approach is adopted to determine the importance of different external stakeholders in IT governance by examining how they are prioritized in this context. Results suggested that external stakeholders’ prioritization in IT governance context as perceived by IT executives vary according to IT decision domains. Moreover external stakeholders’ influence over IT decision domains may be direct or indirect depending on their active role in IT activities or on their relationship with the organization as a whole. Implications of results are discussed.

[1]  F. Bergeron,et al.  Contractual and Consensual Profiles for an Interorganizational Governance of Information Technology , 2013 .

[2]  Alan Fowler,et al.  A Framework for Stakeholder Integration in Higher Education Information Systems Projects , 2003, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[3]  Ping Wang,et al.  Launching professional services automation: Institutional entrepreneurship for information technology innovations , 2007, Inf. Organ..

[4]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[5]  Albert Boonstra,et al.  Interpreting an ERP implementation from a stakeholder perspective , 2005 .

[6]  A. Stinchcombe.  Information and Organizations , 2019 .

[7]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[8]  M. Clarkson.  A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance , 1995 .

[9]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[10]  Hamid Tavakolian,et al.  Linking the Information Technology Structure with Organizational Competitive Strategy: A Survey , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  J. Christopher,et al.  Corporate governance—A multi-theoretical approach to recognizing the wider influencing forces impacting on organizations , 2010 .

[12]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research & evaluation methods , 2002 .

[13]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[14]  Steven De Haes,et al.  An Exploratory Study into the Design of an IT Governance Minimum Baseline through Delphi Research , 2008, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Anita Maurstad,et al.  In whose interest? An exploratory analysis of stakeholders in Norwegian coastal zone planning , 2004 .

[16]  Michael T. Friedman,et al.  A Stakeholder approach to Understanding Economic Development Decision Making: Public Subsidies for Professional Sport Facilities , 2004 .

[17]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  PRE-ASSESSMENT TO ASSESS THE MATCH BETWEEN COST-EFFECTIVENESS RESULTS AND DECISION MAKERS' INFORMATION NEEDS , 2003, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[18]  R. Rupnik,et al.  A model of influences of environmental stakeholders on strategic information systems planning success in an enterprise , 2013 .

[19]  Norman L. Chervany,et al.  The Relationship Between Organizational Characteristics and the Structure of the Information Services Function , 1980, MIS Q..

[20]  Mark C. Suchman.  Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[21]  Moshe Zviran,et al.  Factors Affecting the Policy for Distributing Computing Resources , 1989, MIS Q..

[22]  Marguerite Schneider,et al.  Institutional Investor Power and Heterogeneity , 2003 .

[23]  Albert Boonstra,et al.  Interpreting an ERP-implementation project from a stakeholder perspective , 2015 .

[24]  Ann Buchholtz,et al.  Business & Society Ethics and Stakeholder Management , 2006 .

[25]  Marco Guerci,et al.  Moving toward stakeholder-based HRM: a perspective of Italian HR managers , 2013 .

[26]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Trust dynamics in a large system implementation: six theoretical propositions , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[27]  R. Peterson.  Integration Strategies and Tactics for Information Technology Governance , 2004 .

[28]  Sophia Kluge,et al.  The Survey Handbook , 2016 .

[29]  H. Jansen,et al.  The Logic of Qualitative Survey Research and its Position in the Field of Social Research Methods , 2010 .

[30]  S. Bell,et al.  Stakeholder Salience Revisited: Refining, Redefining, and Refueling an Underdeveloped Conceptual Tool , 2011 .

[31]  Shawn L. Berman,et al.  Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance , 1999 .

[32]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Who Matters to Ceos? An Investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corpate Performance, and Ceo Values , 1999 .

[33]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[34]  Varun Grover,et al.  Profiles of Strategic Information Systems Planning , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  R. Freeman,et al.  A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation , 1998 .

[36]  Ping Wang,et al.  Community Learning in Information Technology Innovation , 2009, MIS Q..

[37]  Milena M. Parent,et al.  A Case Study of Stakeholder Identification and Prioritization by Managers , 2007 .

[38]  R. H. Franke.  The Unbounded Mind: Breaking the Chains of Traditional Business Thinking , 1993 .

[39]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Information Technology Planning in the 1990's: Directions for Practice and Research , 1987, MIS Q..

[40]  L. Diamond.  IT Governance : How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results , 2005 .

[41]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Alignment of the IS Functions With the Enterprise: Toward a Model of Antecedents , 1994, MIS Q..

[42]  Luciana C. Ballejos,et al.  Method for stakeholder identification in interorganizational environments , 2008, Requirements Engineering.

[43]  C. Driscoll,et al.  The Primordial Stakeholder: Advancing the Conceptual Consideration of Stakeholder Status for the Natural Environment , 2004 .

[44]  Ryan Peterson,et al.  Crafting Information Technology Governance , 2004, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[45]  Keith Newton,et al.  Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions — Theory, Cases and Techniques , 1982 .

[46]  Carol V. Brown.  Horizontal Mechanisms Under Differing IS Organization Contexts , 1999, MIS Q..

[47]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Context-Design Issue for the Information Systems Function , 1998 .

[48]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A transaction cost model of IT outsourcing , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[49]  Archie B. Carroll,et al.  Understanding Stakeholder Thinking: Themes from a Finnish Conference , 1997 .

[50]  Athanasia Pouloudi,et al.  Aspects of the stakeholder concept and their implications for information systems development , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[51]  I. Jawahar,et al.  Toward a Descriptive Stakeholder Theory: an Organizational Life Cycle Approach , 2001 .

[52]  D. Wood,et al.  STAKEHOLDER MISMATCHING: A THEORETICAL PROBLEM IN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE , 1995 .

[53]  V BrownCarol,et al.  Alignment of the IS functions with the enterprise , 1994 .

[54]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Learning from Adopters’ Experiences with ERP: Problems Encountered and Success Achieved , 2000 .

[55]  Ping Wang,et al.  Chasing the Hottest IT: Effects of Information Technology Fashion on Organizations , 2010, MIS Q..

[56]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Toward Ethical Information Systems: The Contribution of Discourse Ethics , 2010, MIS Q..

[57]  Daniel L. Sherrell,et al.  Communications of the Association for Information Systems , 1999 .

[58]  Peter F. Green,et al.  The Influence of Top Managements' Absorptive Capacity of IT Governance Knowledge on Business-IT Alignment: an Empirical Analysis , 2012, AMCIS.

[59]  Monika I. Winn,et al.  A Modeling Methodology for Multiobjective Multistakeholder Decisions , 2001 .

[60]  Phillip Ein-Dor,et al.  Centralization, decentralization and management information systems , 1978, Inf. Manag..

[61]  E. Beulen,et al.  Managing IT Outsourcing , 2010 .

[62]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[63]  Antonio Argandoña,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory and the Common Good , 1998 .

[64]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[65]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Fix IT-business relationships through better decision rights , 2007, CACM.

[66]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Going Concerns: The Governance of Interorganizational Coordination Hubs , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[68]  T. Jones.  INSTRUMENTAL STAKEHOLDER THEORY: A SYNTHESIS OF ETHICS AND ECONOMICS , 1995 .

[69]  Carol V. Brown.  Examining the Emergence of Hybrid IS Governance Solutions: Evidence From a Single Case Site , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[70]  Philip Powell,et al.  Overcoming stakeholder barriers in the automotive industry: building to order with extra-organizational systems , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[71]  Ronald J.M. Jeurissen,et al.  Institutional Conditions of Corporate Citizenship , 2004 .

[72]  A. Schaefer,et al.  Managing Relationships with Environmental Stakeholders: A Study of U.K. Water and Electricity Utilities , 2001 .

[73]  Phillip Ein-Dor,et al.  Organizational Context and MIS Structure: Some Empirical Evidence , 1982, MIS Q..

[74]  Vanessa Magness,et al.  Who are the Stakeholders Now? An Empirical Examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood Theory of Stakeholder Salience , 2008 .