Which Boundary Objects Are Applicable to Service Innovation? A Dynamic Capability Perspective

Service Innovation has become a focal point of attention for managers. Hence, organizations need to implement a convenient innovation strategy to remain competitive in constantly changing market environments. To identify, design and implement possible service innovation, organizations already successfully cooperate with external partners, suppliers, customers or internally through different functional departments. In so doing, organizational boundaries occur with respect to unequally distributed knowledge. This disparity needs to be overcome by spanning different groups through technology. In this article, we analyze what kind of IT artifact, so called boundary object, can be used within a service innovation. To this end, we conduct an empirical investigation in 500 German SMEs with the aim of identifying suitable boundary objects for each stage of a service innovation process. Drawing from the dynamic capability and boundary spanning theory we identify four boundary object types and reveal an insufficient utilization of them.

[1]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[2]  Emmanuelle Vaast,et al.  The Emergence of Boundary Spanning Competence in Practice: Implications for Implementation and Use of Information Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[3]  Cem Canel,et al.  Designing service processes: a design factor based process model , 2006, Int. J. Serv. Technol. Manag..

[4]  Ulrike de Brentani.  Innovative versus incremental new business services : Different keys for achieving success , 2001 .

[5]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  New service development: areas for exploitation and exploration , 2002 .

[6]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[7]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[8]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  PRECONDITIONS FOR BPR SUCCESS And How to Prevent Failures , 1994 .

[9]  Michael Shulver.  Operational loss and new service design , 2005 .

[10]  R. Elashoff,et al.  Missing Observations in Multivariate Statistics I. Review of the Literature , 1966 .

[11]  Kah-Hin Chai,et al.  A TRIZ-Based Method for New Service Design , 2005 .

[12]  Udo Staber,et al.  Networking Beyond Organizational Boundaries: The Case of Project Organizations , 2004 .

[13]  M. Tushman.  Special Boundary Roles in the Innovation Process. , 1977 .

[14]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[15]  David J. Collis,et al.  Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? , 1994 .

[16]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[17]  H. Droege,et al.  Innovation in services: present findings, and future pathways , 2009 .

[18]  Simon Machin,et al.  Implications of business process management for operations management , 1997 .

[19]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing , 2004 .

[20]  Min Basadur,et al.  Collaborative Problem Solving Through Creativity in Problem Definition: Expanding the Pie , 2000 .

[21]  Min Basadur,et al.  The Role of Knowledge Management in the Innovation Process , 2006 .

[22]  T. M. Amabile.  The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. , 1983 .

[23]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 2 of 2: Organizational Boundaries and Theories of Organization , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Beth A. Bechky.  Sharing Meaning Across Occupational Communities: The Transformation of Understanding on a Production Floor , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[25]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[26]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  Taking Time to Integrate Temporal Research , 2001 .

[27]  Charlotte P. Lee,et al.  Boundary Negotiating Artifacts: Unbinding the Routine of Boundary Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work , 2007, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[28]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[29]  A. Oke.  Innovation types and innovation management practices in service companies , 2007 .

[30]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Boundary Objects and Heterogeneous Distributed Problem Solving , 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence.

[31]  Susan Gasson,et al.  A genealogical study of boundary-spanning IS design , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[32]  A. Johne,et al.  New service development: a review of the literature and annotated bibliography , 1998 .

[33]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Turn to the material: Remote diagnostics systems and new forms of boundary-spanning , 2009, Inf. Organ..

[34]  C. McDermott,et al.  Service innovation and performance in SMEs , 2012 .

[35]  A. Nerkar,et al.  Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry , 2001 .

[36]  K. Lewin.  Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[37]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of participation in decision making. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  David F. Larcker,et al.  Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics: , 1981 .

[39]  Stephen L. Vargo,et al.  Service, value networks and learning , 2010 .

[40]  D. Teece.  Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and Growth , 2009 .

[41]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Multi‐contextuality in boundary‐spanning practices , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[42]  Sergios Dimitriadis,et al.  Managing the new service development process: towards a systemic model , 2005 .

[43]  Jörg Henseler,et al.  Modeling Reflective Higher-Order Constructs using Three Approaches with PLS Path Modeling: A Monte Carlo Comparison , 2007 .

[44]  Kirsimarja Blomqvist,et al.  Collaboration capability a focal concept in knowledge creation and collaborative innovation in networks , 2006 .