Evolution of the Genomic Recombination Rate in Murid Rodents

Although very closely related species can differ in their fine-scale patterns of recombination hotspots, variation in the average genomic recombination rate among recently diverged taxa has rarely been surveyed. We measured recombination rates in eight species that collectively represent several temporal scales of divergence within a single rodent family, Muridae. We used a cytological approach that enables in situ visualization of crossovers at meiosis to quantify recombination rates in multiple males from each rodent group. We uncovered large differences in genomic recombination rate between rodent species, which were independent of karyotypic variation. The divergence in genomic recombination rate that we document is not proportional to DNA sequence divergence, suggesting that recombination has evolved at variable rates along the murid phylogeny. Additionally, we document significant variation in genomic recombination rate both within and between subspecies of house mice. Recombination rates estimated in F1 hybrids reveal evidence for sex-linked loci contributing to the evolution of recombination in house mice. Our results provide one of the first detailed portraits of genomic-scale recombination rate variation within a single mammalian family and demonstrate that the low recombination rates in laboratory mice and rats reflect a more general reduction in recombination rate across murid rodents.

[1]  K. Paigen,et al.  Mammalian recombination hot spots: properties, control and evolution , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[2]  K. Paigen,et al.  Prdm9 Controls Activation of Mammalian Recombination Hotspots , 2010, Science.

[3]  G. Coop,et al.  PRDM9 Is a Major Determinant of Meiotic Recombination Hotspots in Humans and Mice , 2010, Science.

[4]  D. Barbash,et al.  Species-Specific Heterochromatin Prevents Mitotic Chromosome Segregation to Cause Hybrid Lethality in Drosophila , 2009, PLoS biology.

[5]  Wentian Li,et al.  Two-parameter characterization of chromosome-scale recombination rate. , 2009, Genome research.

[6]  R. Vallente,et al.  Meiotic Recombination in Human Oocytes , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[7]  K. Broman,et al.  Variation in Genomic Recombination Rates Among Heterogeneous Stock Mice , 2009, Genetics.

[8]  Gary A. Churchill,et al.  A New Standard Genetic Map for the Laboratory Mouse , 2009, Genetics.

[9]  K. Paigen,et al.  Parental origin of chromosomes influences crossover activity within the Kcnq1 transcriptionally imprinted domain of Mus musculus , 2009, BMC Molecular Biology.

[10]  P. Hunt,et al.  Cytological studies of recombination in rhesus males , 2009, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[11]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  The rise and fall of a human recombination hot spot , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[12]  K. Paigen,et al.  Trans-Regulation of Mouse Meiotic Recombination Hotspots by Rcr1 , 2009, PLoS biology.

[13]  C. Grey,et al.  Genome-Wide Control of the Distribution of Meiotic Recombination , 2009, PLoS biology.

[14]  J. K. Holloway,et al.  MUS81 Generates a Subset of MLH1-MLH3–Independent Crossovers in Mammalian Meiosis , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[15]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  Sperm cross-over activity in regions of the human genome showing extreme breakdown of marker association , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Jin P. Szatkiewicz,et al.  The Recombinational Anatomy of a Mouse Chromosome , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[17]  C. Bidau,et al.  General pattern of meiotic recombination in male dogs estimated by MLH1 and RAD51 immunolocalization , 2008, Chromosome Research.

[18]  Laurent Duret,et al.  The Impact of Recombination on Nucleotide Substitutions in the Human Genome , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[19]  G. Coop,et al.  High-Resolution Mapping of Crossovers Reveals Extensive Variation in Fine-Scale Recombination Patterns Among Humans , 2008, Science.

[20]  J. Searle,et al.  Recombination Map of the Common Shrew, Sorex araneus (Eulipotyphla, Mammalia) , 2008, Genetics.

[21]  Hyuna Yang,et al.  On the subspecific origin of the laboratory mouse , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[22]  H. Hoekstra,et al.  Adaptive Variation in Beach Mice Produced by Two Interacting Pigmentation Genes , 2007, PLoS Biology.

[23]  B. de Massy,et al.  Cis- and Trans-Acting Elements Regulate the Mouse Psmb9 Meiotic Recombination Hotspot , 2007, PLoS genetics.

[24]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  Factors influencing recombination frequency and distribution in a human meiotic crossover hotspot. , 2005, Human molecular genetics.

[25]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Comparison of Fine-Scale Recombination Rates in Humans and Chimpanzees , 2005, Science.

[26]  M. Hultén,et al.  Inter-sex variation in synaptonemal complex lengths largely determine the different recombination rates in male and female germ cells , 2004, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.

[27]  Lisa M. D'Souza,et al.  Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution , 2004, Nature.

[28]  Thomas Liehr,et al.  Human male recombination maps for individual chromosomes. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.

[29]  J. Ross-Ibarra The Evolution of Recombination under Domestication: A Test of Two Hypotheses , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[30]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Coordinate variation in meiotic pachytene SC length and total crossover/chiasma frequency under conditions of constant DNA length. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[31]  O. Gascuel,et al.  A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. , 2003, Systematic biology.

[32]  P. Hunt,et al.  Genetic control of mammalian meiotic recombination. I. Variation in exchange frequencies among males from inbred mouse strains. , 2002, Genetics.

[33]  C. Sapienza,et al.  X chromosome effect on maternal recombination and meiotic drive in the mouse. , 2002, Genetics.

[34]  D. Gudbjartsson,et al.  A high-resolution recombination map of the human genome , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[35]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Covariation of Synaptonemal Complex Length and Mammalian Meiotic Exchange Rates , 2002, Science.

[36]  N. Barton,et al.  SELECTION FOR RECOMBINATION IN SMALL POPULATIONS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[37]  S. Henikoff,et al.  The Centromere Paradox: Stable Inheritance with Rapidly Evolving DNA , 2001, Science.

[38]  J. Pritchard,et al.  Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. , 2001, American journal of human genetics.

[39]  P. Hunt,et al.  To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[40]  C. Sapienza,et al.  Recombination is proportional to the number of chromosome arms in mammals , 2001, Mammalian Genome.

[41]  R G Steen,et al.  A high-density integrated genetic linkage and radiation hybrid map of the laboratory rat. , 1999, Genome research.

[42]  L. Anderson,et al.  Distribution of crossing over on mouse synaptonemal complexes using immunofluorescent localization of MLH1 protein. , 1999, Genetics.

[43]  M. Guyer,et al.  Assessing the quality of the DNA sequence from the Human Genome Project. , 1999, Genome research.

[44]  Y. Hayashizaki,et al.  Linkage map of Syrian hamster with restriction landmark genomic scanning , 1997, Mammalian Genome.

[45]  P. de Boer,et al.  SHORT COMMUNICATIONS A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline , 1997, Chromosome Research.

[46]  T. Prolla,et al.  Involvement of mouse Mlh1 in DNA mismatch repair and meiotic crossing over , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[47]  N. Barton,et al.  A general model for the evolution of recombination. , 1995, Genetical research.

[48]  J. Thompson,et al.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[49]  D. Heine,et al.  Analysis of recombinational hot spots associated with the p haplotype of the mouse MHC. , 1994, Genomics.

[50]  T. Säll,et al.  Chiasma and recombination data in plants: are they compatible? , 1993, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[51]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. , 1993, Genetics.

[52]  M. Nei,et al.  Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[53]  N E Morton,et al.  Parameters of the human genome. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  T. Sagai,et al.  Genetic control of sex‐dependent meiotic recombination in the major histocompatibility complex of the mouse. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[55]  J. Gearhart,et al.  Sex, strain, and species differences affect recombination across an evolutionarily conserved segment of mouse chromosome 16. , 1990, Genomics.

[56]  G. Bell,et al.  Mammalian chiasma frequencies as a test of two theories of recombination , 1987, Nature.

[57]  J. Felsenstein Phylogenies and the Comparative Method , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[58]  A. Kondrashov Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor. 1. The advantage of recombination. , 1984, Genetical research.

[59]  R. Baker,et al.  CHROMOSOMAL HOMOLOGY AND DIVERGENCE BETWEEN SIBLING SPECIES OF DEER MICE: PEROMYSCUS MANICULATUS AND P. MELANOTIS (RODENTIA, CRICETIDAE) , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[60]  J. Felsenstein The evolutionary advantage of recombination. , 1974, Genetics.

[61]  J. Felsenstein,et al.  The effect of linkage on directional selection. , 1965, Genetics.

[62]  B. Payseur,et al.  ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00278.x EVOLUTION OF THE GENOMIC RATE OF , 2007 .

[63]  G. Coop,et al.  An evolutionary view of human recombination , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[64]  J C Murray,et al.  Pediatrics and , 1998 .

[65]  B. Dutrillaux [Role of chromosomes in evolution: a new interpretation]. , 1986, Annales de genetique.

[66]  J. Haigh,et al.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. , 1974, Genetical research.

[67]  D. von Wettstein,et al.  The synaptinemal complex. , 1972, Annual review of genetics.

[68]  N. Patil,et al.  Nature Genetics Advance Online Publication Fine-scale Recombination Patterns Differ between Chimpanzees and Humans , 2022 .