Harnessing the influence of reactive edges and defects of graphene substrates for achieving complete cycle of room-temperature molecular sensing.

Molecular doping and detection are at the forefront of graphene research, a topic of great interest in physical and materials science. Molecules adsorb strongly on graphene, leading to a change in electrical conductivity at room temperature. However, a common impediment for practical applications reported by all studies to date is the excessively slow rate of desorption of important reactive gases such as ammonia and nitrogen dioxide. Annealing at high temperatures, or exposure to strong ultraviolet light under vacuum, is employed to facilitate desorption of these gases. In this article, the molecules adsorbed on graphene nanoflakes and on chemically derived graphene-nanomesh flakes are displaced rapidly at room temperature in air by the use of gaseous polar molecules such as water and ethanol. The mechanism for desorption is proposed to arise from the electrostatic forces exerted by the polar molecules, which decouples the overlap between substrate defect states, molecule states, and graphene states near the Fermi level. Using chemiresistors prepared from water-based dispersions of single-layer graphene on mesoporous alumina membranes, the study further shows that the edges of the graphene flakes (showing p-type responses to NO₂ and NH₃) and the edges of graphene nanomesh structures (showing n-type responses to NO₂ and NH₃) have enhanced sensitivity. The measured responses towards gases are comparable to or better than those which have been obtained using devices that are more sophisticated. The higher sensitivity and rapid regeneration of the sensor at room temperature provides a clear advancement towards practical molecule detection using graphene-based materials.

[1]  N. Kybert,et al.  Intrinsic response of graphene vapor sensors. , 2008, Nano letters.

[2]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  Thermodynamics fromab initiocomputations , 2004 .

[3]  Rodney S. Ruoff,et al.  Effect of Water Vapor on Electrical Properties of Individual Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheets , 2008 .

[4]  I. Snook,et al.  High throughput theory and simulation of nanomaterials: exploring the stability and electronic properties of nanographene , 2012 .

[5]  Douglas R. Kauffman,et al.  Graphene versus carbon nanotubes for chemical sensor and fuel cell applications. , 2010, The Analyst.

[6]  Qian Wang,et al.  Toward Large Arrays of Multiplex Functionalized Carbon Nanotube Sensors for Highly Sensitive and Selective Molecular Detection. , 2003, Nano letters.

[7]  Zhongqing Wei,et al.  Reduced graphene oxide molecular sensors. , 2008, Nano letters.

[8]  Jannik C. Meyer,et al.  The structure of suspended graphene sheets , 2007, Nature.

[9]  Madhav Gautam,et al.  Adsorption kinetics of ammonia sensing by graphene films decorated with platinum nanoparticles , 2012 .

[10]  Jason L. Johnson,et al.  Experimental study of graphitic nanoribbon films for ammonia sensing , 2011 .

[11]  Amanda S. Barnard,et al.  Modelling the role of size, edge structure and terminations on the electronic properties of graphene nano-flakes , 2011 .

[12]  Hui-Ming Cheng,et al.  High Sensitivity Gas Detection Using a Macroscopic Three-Dimensional Graphene Foam Network , 2011, Scientific reports.

[13]  Jean-Christophe Charlier,et al.  Graphene and graphite nanoribbons: Morphology, properties, synthesis, defects and applications , 2010 .

[14]  Louis E. Brus,et al.  High-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy imaging of mesoscopic graphene sheets on an insulating surface , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  B. H. Weiller,et al.  Practical chemical sensors from chemically derived graphene. , 2009, ACS nano.

[16]  K. Novoselov,et al.  Molecular doping of graphene. , 2007, Nano letters.

[17]  N. Koratkar,et al.  Graphene-Based Chemical Sensors. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry letters.

[18]  Jill McDonnell,et al.  Ammonia sensing characteristics of carbon-nanotube yarns decorated with nanocrystalline gold , 2011 .

[19]  I. Snook,et al.  Modelling the role of size, edge structure and terminations on the electronic properties of trigonal graphene nanoflakes , 2012, Nanotechnology.

[20]  F. M. Peeters,et al.  Adsorption of H 2 O , N H 3 , CO, N O 2 , and NO on graphene: A first-principles study , 2007, 0710.1757.

[21]  Anran Liu,et al.  High‐Performance NO2 Sensors Based on Chemically Modified Graphene , 2013, Advanced materials.

[22]  Tim O. Wehling,et al.  First-principles studies of water adsorption on graphene: The role of the substrate , 2008, 0809.2894.

[23]  Ruitao Lv,et al.  The role of defects and doping in 2D graphene sheets and 1D nanoribbons , 2012, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[24]  L. Randeniya,et al.  Removal of strongly-bound gases from single-walled carbon nanotubes without annealing or ultraviolet light exposure , 2013 .

[25]  R. Ruoff,et al.  All-organic vapor sensor using inkjet-printed reduced graphene oxide. , 2010, Angewandte Chemie.

[26]  K. Novoselov,et al.  Detection of individual gas molecules adsorbed on graphene. , 2006, Nature materials.

[27]  T. Paronyan,et al.  Enhanced gas sensing in pristine carbon nanotubes under continuous ultraviolet light illumination , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[28]  Bing-Lin Gu,et al.  Adsorption of Gas Molecules on Graphene Nanoribbons and Its Implication for Nanoscale Molecule Sensor , 2008, 0803.1516.

[29]  Alireza Saffarzadeh,et al.  Modeling of gas adsorption on graphene nanoribbons , 2010, 1002.3941.

[30]  Sokrates T. Pantelides,et al.  Molecular doping of graphene with ammonium groups , 2012 .

[31]  M. Stutzmann,et al.  Water adsorbate mediated accumulation gas sensing at hydrogenated diamond surfaces , 2013 .