Dissociation of Pavlovian and instrumental incentive learning under dopamine antagonists.

The administration of the dopamine antagonists, pimozide and alpha-flupenthixol, to rats reduced Pavlovian-instrumental transfer when a conditioned stimulus (CS) that had been paired with a noncontingent food reward was tested on instrumental performance. The administration of the antagonists during Pavlovian conditioning and/or testing abolished the enhancement of instrumental performance by the CS. The effect of both antagonists on instrumental incentive learning was then examined. After training in which the rats performed 2 responses for different food rewards, they consumed 1 type food under the antagonists and the other type under vehicle during reexposure. When instrumental responding was subsequently tested in extinction, performance was unaffected by whether the rats had been reexposed to the training reward under the antagonists. These results suggest that Pavlovian and instrumental incentive learning are not mediated by a common process.

[1]  D. Bindra A motivational view of learning, performance, and behavior modification. , 1974, Psychological review.

[2]  B. Balleine,et al.  Motivational control of goal-directed action , 1994 .

[3]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Motivational Control of Instrumental Performance: The Role of Prior Experience of The Reinforcer , 1988 .

[4]  Christopher D. Adams,et al.  Instrumental Responding following Reinforcer Devaluation , 1981 .

[5]  B. Skinner,et al.  Principles of Behavior , 1944 .

[6]  Matías López,et al.  Sensitivity of instrumental responses to an upshift in water deprivation , 1999 .

[7]  E. Tolman There is more than one kind of learning. , 1949, Psychological review.

[8]  K. Berridge,et al.  The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction , 1993, Brain Research Reviews.

[9]  J. Horvitz,et al.  Conditioned incentive properties of a food-paired conditioned stimulus remain intact during dopamine receptor blockade. , 1991 .

[10]  B. Balleine,et al.  Cholecystokinin attenuates incentive learning in rats. , 1995, Behavioral neuroscience.

[11]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. , 1967, Psychological review.

[12]  K. Berridge,et al.  Chlordiazepoxide directly enhances positive ingestive reactions in rats , 1986, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[13]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Incentive Learning and the Motivational Control of Instrumental Performance , 1989 .

[14]  J. Salamone,et al.  Behavioral functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine: Empirical and conceptual problems with the anhedonia hypothesis , 1997, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[15]  R. D. Borchgrave On the involvement of the rat nucleus accumbens in instrumental performance. , 1995 .

[16]  E. Tolman The nature and functioning of wants. , 1949, Psychological review.

[17]  P. Holland,et al.  Differential effects of omission contingencies on various components of Pavlovian appetitive conditioned responding in rats. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[18]  B. Balleine,et al.  Instrumental Performance following Reinforcer Devaluation Depends upon Incentive Learning , 1991 .

[19]  R. Beninger,et al.  Dopamine D1-like Receptors and Reward-related Incentive Learning , 1998, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[20]  B. Balleine,et al.  Effects of ibotenic acid lesions of the Nucleus Accumbens on instrumental action , 1994, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  B. Balleine Asymmetrical Interactions between Thirst and Hunger in Pavlovian-Instrumental Transfer , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[22]  W. Schultz,et al.  Responses of monkey dopamine neurons during learning of behavioral reactions. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  A. Dickinson,et al.  Pavlovian Processes in the Motivational Control of Instrumental Performance , 1987 .

[24]  B. Balleine,et al.  Goal-directed instrumental action: contingency and incentive learning and their cortical substrates , 1998, Neuropharmacology.

[25]  L. Crespi Quantitative variation of incentive and performance in the white rat. , 1942 .

[26]  R. Wise,et al.  Neuroleptic-induced "anhedonia" in rats: pimozide blocks reward quality of food. , 1978, Science.

[27]  K. Berridge,et al.  Pimozide Does Not Shift Palatability: Separation of Anhedonia from Sensorimotor Suppression by Taste Reactivity , 1997, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[28]  A. Phillips,et al.  Dopamine and preparatory behavior: I. Effects of pimozide. , 1987, Behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  T. Robbins,et al.  Symmetrical effects of amphetamine and alpha-flupenthixol on conditioned punishment and conditioned reinforcement: contrasts with midazolam , 1997, Psychopharmacology.

[30]  Richard J. Beninger,et al.  The effects of pimozide during pairing on the transfer of classical conditioning to an operant discrimination , 1981, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[31]  J. Deutsch The structural basis of behavior , 1960 .

[32]  P. Lovibond Facilitation of instrumental behavior by a Pavlovian appetitive conditioned stimulus. , 1983 .

[33]  W. Estes Discriminative conditioning. I. A discriminative property of conditioned anticipation. , 1943 .

[34]  B. Balleine,et al.  Role of cholecystokinin in the motivational control of instrumental action in rats. , 1994, Behavioral neuroscience.

[35]  V Bassareo,et al.  Differential Influence of Associative and Nonassociative Learning Mechanisms on the Responsiveness of Prefrontal and Accumbal Dopamine Transmission to Food Stimuli in Rats Fed Ad Libitum , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  K. Mcfarland,et al.  Haloperidol does not affect motivational processes in an operant runway model of food-seeking behavior. , 1998 .

[37]  N. Mackintosh A Theory of Attention: Variations in the Associability of Stimuli with Reinforcement , 1975 .

[38]  K. Berridge,et al.  Intra-Accumbens Amphetamine Increases the Conditioned Incentive Salience of Sucrose Reward: Enhancement of Reward “Wanting” without Enhanced “Liking” or Response Reinforcement , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  C. L. Hull,et al.  A Behavior System , 1954 .

[40]  H. Fibiger,et al.  Dopaminergic correlates of motivated behavior: importance of drive , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[41]  K. Berridge,et al.  Taste reactivity as a measure of the neural control of palatability , 1985 .

[42]  K. Nader,et al.  Neurobiology of motivation: double dissociation of two motivational mechanisms mediating opiate reward in drug-naive versus drug-dependent animals. , 1992, Behavioral neuroscience.

[43]  R. Rescorla,et al.  Postconditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. , 1985 .

[44]  B. Balleine,et al.  Benzodiazepine-induced outcome revaluation and the motivational control of instrumental action in rats. , 1994, Behavioral neuroscience.

[45]  R. Colwill,et al.  Encoding of the unconditioned stimulus in Pavlovian conditioning , 1994 .

[46]  B. Balleine Instrumental performance following a shift in primary motivation depends on incentive learning. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[47]  J. Pearce,et al.  A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli. , 1980 .

[48]  R. Wise,et al.  Major attenuation of food reward with performance-sparing doses of pimozide in the rat. , 1978, Canadian journal of psychology.

[49]  B. Balleine,et al.  Signalling and Incentive Processes in Instrumental Reinforcer Devaluation , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[50]  K. Berridge,et al.  What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonic impact, reward learning, or incentive salience? , 1998, Brain Research Reviews.

[51]  B. Balleine,et al.  Incentive learning and the motivational control of instrumental performance by thirst , 1989 .