Spatial integration in position acuity

[1]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Spatial localization of motion-defined and luminance-defined contours , 1993, Vision Research.

[2]  D. Levi,et al.  Orientation, masking, and vernier acuity for line targets , 1993, Vision Research.

[3]  Thom Carney,et al.  Can sinusoidal vernier acuity be predicted by contrast discrimination? , 1993, Vision Research.

[4]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Visibility, timing and vernier acuity , 1993, Vision Research.

[5]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Visibility, luminance and vernier acuity , 1993, Vision Research.

[6]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Visibility and vernier acuity for separated targets , 1993, Vision Research.

[7]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  “Weber's law” for position: the role of spatial frequency and contrast , 1992, Vision Research.

[8]  Stanley A. Klein,et al.  An Excel macro for transformed and weighted averaging , 1992 .

[9]  Eric Mjolsness,et al.  A center-of-mass computation describes the precision of random dot displacement discrimination , 1992, Vision Research.

[10]  D Whitaker,et al.  Sequential mapping of weighting functions for visual location. , 1992, Spatial vision.

[11]  Bart Farell,et al.  Vernier acuity: Effects of chromatic content, blur and contrast , 1991, Vision Research.

[12]  M. Morgan,et al.  Efficiency of locating centres of dot-clusters by human observers , 1991, Vision Research.

[13]  B. Boycott,et al.  Functional architecture of the mammalian retina. , 1991, Physiological reviews.

[14]  D M Levi,et al.  Binocular summation in vernier acuity. , 1991, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  T. E. Cohn Vision: Spatial and temporal summation in human vision , 1991 .

[16]  Christine A. Curcio,et al.  Chapter 5 Organization and development of the primate photoreceptor mosaic , 1991 .

[17]  S. F. Bowne Contrast discrimination cannot explain spatial frequency, orientation or temporal frequency discrimination , 1990, Vision Research.

[18]  S. McKee,et al.  Finding the common bond: Stereoacuity and the other hyperacuities , 1990, Vision Research.

[19]  M. Morgan,et al.  Biases and sensitivities in geometrical illusions , 1990, Vision Research.

[20]  Thom Carney,et al.  Vernier acuity as line and dipole detection , 1990, Vision Research.

[21]  C. A. Burbeck,et al.  Two mechanisms for localization? Evidence for separation-dependent and separation-independent processing of position information , 1990, Vision Research.

[22]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Equivalent intrinsic blur in spatial vision , 1990, Vision Research.

[23]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Spatial interval discrimination with blurred lines: Black and white are separate but not equal at multiple spatial scales , 1990, Vision Research.

[24]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  The role of separation and eccentricity in encoding position , 1990, Vision Research.

[25]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[26]  M J Morgan,et al.  Evidence for positional coding in hyperacuity. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[27]  Thom Carney,et al.  Cortical processing of hyperacuity tasks , 1989, Vision Research.

[28]  G Westheimer,et al.  Binocular summation of hyperacuity tasks. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[29]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  10 – THE PERCEPTION OF FORM: Retina to Striate Cortex , 1989 .

[30]  W. Geisler Sequential ideal-observer analysis of visual discriminations. , 1989, Psychological review.

[31]  D. Whitaker,et al.  Centroid evaluation in the vernier alignment of random dot clusters , 1988, Vision Research.

[32]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Scale invariant features of differential spatial displacement discrimination , 1987, Vision Research.

[33]  B. Skottun,et al.  Effects of contrast and spatial frequency on vernier acuity , 1987, Vision Research.

[34]  S. Klein,et al.  Positional uncertainty in peripheral and amblyopic vision , 1987, Vision Research.

[35]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  The physical limits of grating visibility , 1987, Vision Research.

[36]  S. Klein,et al.  Position sense of the peripheral retina. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[37]  D M Levi,et al.  Spatial-interval discrimination in the human fovea: what delimits the interval? , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[38]  S. McKee,et al.  Dichoptic hyperacuity: the precision of nonius alignment. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[39]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity , 1986, Vision Research.

[40]  R. Shapley,et al.  Cat and monkey retinal ganglion cells and their visual functional roles , 1986, Trends in Neurosciences.

[41]  M. Morgan The detection of spatial discontinuities: interactions between contrast and spatial contiguity. , 1986, Spatial vision.

[42]  S. Klein,et al.  Sampling in spatial vision , 1986, Nature.

[43]  S. Klein,et al.  Vernier acuity, crowding and cortical magnification , 1985, Vision Research.

[44]  C Casco,et al.  The location of noisy visual stimuli. , 1985, Canadian journal of psychology.

[45]  W. Geisler,et al.  Ideal discriminators in spatial vision: two-point stimuli. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[46]  M J Morgan,et al.  Spatial and spatial-frequency primitives in spatial-interval discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[47]  A. Parker,et al.  Capabilities of monkey cortical cells in spatial-resolution tasks. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[48]  S. Klein,et al.  Hyperacuity thresholds of 1 sec: theoretical predictions and empirical validation. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[49]  D. Regan,et al.  Postadaptation orientation discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[50]  M J Morgan,et al.  Vernier acuity predicted from changes in the light distribution of the retinal image. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[51]  F. Campbell,et al.  Vernier acuity: interactions between length effects and gaps when orientation cues are eliminated. , 1985, Spatial vision.

[52]  R. J. Watt,et al.  Towards a general theory of the visual acuities for shape and spatial arrangement , 1984, Vision Research.

[53]  S. Klein,et al.  Detection and discrimination of the direction of motion in central and peripheral vision of normal and amblyopic observers , 1984, Vision Research.

[54]  R. J. Watt,et al.  The use of different cues in vernier acuity , 1983, Vision Research.

[55]  R. J. Watt,et al.  Mechanisms responsible for the assessment of visual location: Theory and evidence , 1983, Vision Research.

[56]  G. Legge A power law for contrast discrimination , 1981, Vision Research.

[57]  J. Beck,et al.  Vernier acuity with dot test objects , 1979, Vision Research.

[58]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  Acuity for spatial separation as a function of stimulus size , 1978, Vision Research.

[59]  S. McKee,et al.  Spatial configurations for visual hyperacuity , 1977, Vision Research.

[60]  Suzanne P. McKee,et al.  Integration regions for visual hyperacuity , 1977, Vision Research.

[61]  G Westheimer,et al.  Editorial: Visual acuity and hyperacuity. , 1975, Investigative ophthalmology.

[62]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  Acuities for spatial arrangement in line figures: human and ideal observers compared. , 1973, Vision research.

[63]  J. M. FINDLAY Feature Detectors and Vernier Acuity , 1973, Nature.

[64]  K. Oatley,et al.  Vernier acuity as affected by target length and separation , 1972 .

[65]  E. Ludvigh,et al.  The effect of orientation on the three-dot alignment test. , 1967, American journal of ophthalmology.

[66]  R. Steinman,et al.  Voluntary Control of Microsaccades during Maintained Monocular Fixation , 1967, Science.

[67]  F. Campbell,et al.  Optical quality of the human eye , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[68]  H. Barlow Chapter 16 – THE PHYSICAL LIMITS OF VISUAL DISCRIMINATION , 1964 .

[69]  H. Barlow Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities , 1958, The Journal of physiology.

[70]  E. Ludvigh Direction sense of the eye. , 1953, American journal of ophthalmology.

[71]  A. Rose The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale. , 1948, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[72]  H. Vries The quantum character of light and its bearing upon threshold of vision, the differential sensitivity and visual acuity of the eye , 1943 .

[73]  Carel C. Koch,et al.  AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPTOMETRY , 1939 .

[74]  F. W. Weymouth,et al.  Visual perception and the retinal mosaic. II. The influence of eye-movements on the displacement threshold. , 1925 .

[75]  JAMES WEIR French The unaided eye part III , 1919 .