A Subjective and Objective Study of Stalling Events in Mobile Streaming Videos

Over-the-top mobile adaptive video streaming is invariably influenced by volatile network conditions, which can cause playback interruptions (stalling or rebuffering events) and bitrate fluctuations, thereby impairing users’ quality of experience (QoE). Video quality assessment models that can accurately predict users’ QoE under such volatile network conditions are rapidly gaining attention, since these methods could enable more efficient design of quality control protocols for media-driven services such as YouTube, Amazon, Netflix, and many others. However, the development of improved QoE prediction models requires data sets of videos afflicted with diverse stalling events that have been labeled with ground-truth subjective opinion scores. Toward this end, we have created a new mobile video quality database that we call LIVE Mobile Stall Video Database-II. Our database contains a total of 174 videos afflicted with distortions caused by 26 different stalling patterns. We describe the way we simulated the diverse stalling events to create a corpus of distorted videos, and we detail the human study we conducted to obtain continuous-time subjective scores from 54 subjects. We also present the outcomes of our comprehensive analysis of the impact of several factors that influence subjective QoE, and report the performance of existing QoE-prediction models on our data set. We are making the database (videos, subjective data, and video metadata) publicly available in order to help the advance state-of-the-art research on user-centric mobile network planning and management. The database may be accessed at http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/LIVEStallStudy/liveMobile.html.

[1]  Ali C. Begen,et al.  Probe and Adapt: Rate Adaptation for HTTP Video Streaming At Scale , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[2]  William May,et al.  HTTP Live Streaming , 2017, RFC.

[3]  Ramesh K. Sitaraman,et al.  Video Stream Quality Impacts Viewer Behavior: Inferring Causality Using Quasi-Experimental Designs , 2012, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[4]  King Ngi Ngan,et al.  Full-Reference Video Quality Assessment by Decoupling Detail Losses and Additive Impairments , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[5]  M. Hubert,et al.  An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions , 2008, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[6]  Luca De Cicco,et al.  ELASTIC: A Client-Side Controller for Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH) , 2013, 2013 20th International Packet Video Workshop.

[7]  Peter Lambert,et al.  Assessing Quality of Experience of IPTV and Video on Demand Services in Real-Life Environments , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting.

[8]  Donald J. Berndt,et al.  Using Dynamic Time Warping to Find Patterns in Time Series , 1994, KDD Workshop.

[9]  Stefano Tubaro,et al.  A H.264/AVC video database for the evaluation of quality metrics , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[10]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Delivery quality score model for Internet video , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[11]  Damon M. Chandler,et al.  ViS3: an algorithm for video quality assessment via analysis of spatial and spatiotemporal slices , 2014, J. Electronic Imaging.

[12]  Alexander Raake,et al.  At home in the lab: Assessing audiovisual quality of HTTP-based adaptive streaming with an immersive test paradigm , 2015, 2015 Seventh International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[13]  Christophe Charrier,et al.  Blind Prediction of Natural Video Quality , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[14]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Motion Tuned Spatio-Temporal Quality Assessment of Natural Videos , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Mikko Nuutinen,et al.  CVD2014—A Database for Evaluating No-Reference Video Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  Michael Seufert,et al.  The Impact of Adaptation Strategies on Perceived Quality of HTTP Adaptive Streaming , 2014, VideoNext '14.

[17]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Subjective and objective quality assessment of Mobile Videos with In-Capture distortions , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[18]  S. Thorpe,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[19]  Jean-Bernard Martens,et al.  Quality asessment of coded images using numerical category scaling , 1995, Other Conferences.

[20]  Phuoc Tran-Gia,et al.  A Survey on Quality of Experience of HTTP Adaptive Streaming , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[21]  Luca De Cicco,et al.  Feedback control for adaptive live video streaming , 2011, MMSys.

[22]  Alexander Raake,et al.  Quality impact due to initial loading, stalling, and video bitrate in progressive download video services , 2014, 2014 Sixth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[23]  Zhengfang Duanmu,et al.  Quality-of-experience prediction for streaming video , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME).

[24]  W B Levy,et al.  Primacy versus recency in a quantitative model: activity is the critical distinction. , 2000, Learning & memory.

[25]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Temporal hysteresis model of time varying subjective video quality , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[27]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[28]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Video Quality Assessment by Reduced Reference Spatio-Temporal Entropic Differencing , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[29]  Phuoc Tran-Gia,et al.  Quantification of YouTube QoE via Crowdsourcing , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia.

[30]  F. Wilcoxon Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods , 1945 .

[31]  Xiao-Hong Peng,et al.  An Objective Approach to Measuring Video Playback Quality in Lossy Networks using TCP , 2011, IEEE Communications Letters.

[32]  D. Schacter,et al.  Priming and the Brain , 1998, Neuron.

[33]  Te-Yuan Huang,et al.  A buffer-based approach to rate adaptation: evidence from a large video streaming service , 2015, SIGCOMM 2015.

[34]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Attention Driven Foveated Video Quality Assessment , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[35]  Alexander Raake,et al.  Quality of experience and HTTP adaptive streaming: A review of subjective studies , 2014, 2014 Sixth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[36]  Yang Geng,et al.  Assessing the quality of experience of HTTP video streaming considering the effects of pause position , 2014, The 16th Asia-Pacific Network Operations and Management Symposium.

[37]  Rajiv Soundararajan,et al.  Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Video , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[38]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Structural Similarity Metric for Video Based on Motion Models , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.

[39]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Learning a Continuous-Time Streaming Video QoE Model , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[40]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  Video Quality Assessment on Mobile Devices: Subjective, Behavioral and Objective Studies , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[41]  Graça Bressan,et al.  Quality metric to assess video streaming service over TCP considering temporal location of pauses , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[42]  Alan Conrad Bovik,et al.  Study of Temporal Effects on Subjective Video Quality of Experience , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[43]  Mikko Nuutinen,et al.  CID2013: A Database for Evaluating No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[44]  Vyas Sekar,et al.  Improving fairness, efficiency, and stability in HTTP-based adaptive video streaming with FESTIVE , 2012, CoNEXT '12.

[45]  Phuoc Tran-Gia,et al.  Identifying QoE optimal adaptation of HTTP adaptive streaming based on subjective studies , 2015, Comput. Networks.

[46]  Vyas Sekar,et al.  Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement , 2011, SIGCOMM.

[47]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Study of the effects of stalling events on the quality of experience of mobile streaming videos , 2014, 2014 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing (GlobalSIP).

[48]  Mia Hubert,et al.  LIBRA: a MATLAB library for robust analysis , 2005 .

[49]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A time-varying subjective quality model for mobile streaming videos with stalling events , 2015, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[50]  Ming Zhu,et al.  Analysis and Modelling of No-Reference Video Quality Assessment , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering.

[51]  King Ngi Ngan,et al.  Reduced-Reference Video Quality Assessment of Compressed Video Sequences , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[52]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Video Quality Pooling Adaptive to Perceptual Distortion Severity , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.