A Special Report on Changing Trends in Preventive Stroke/Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Via B-Mode Ultrasonography

Purpose of ReviewCardiovascular disease (CVD) and stroke risk assessment have been largely based on the success of traditional statistically derived risk calculators such as Pooled Cohort Risk Score or Framingham Risk Score. However, over the last decade, automated computational paradigms such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) techniques have penetrated into a variety of medical domains including CVD/stroke risk assessment. This review is mainly focused on the changing trends in CVD/stroke risk assessment and its stratification from statistical-based models to ML-based paradigms using non-invasive carotid ultrasonography.Recent FindingsIn this review, ML-based strategies are categorized into two types: non-image (or conventional ML-based) and image-based (or integrated ML-based). The success of conventional (non-image-based) ML-based algorithms lies in the different data-driven patterns or features which are used to train the ML systems. Typically these features are the patients’ demographics, serum biomarkers, and multiple clinical parameters. The integrated (image-based) ML-based algorithms integrate the features derived from the ultrasound scans of the arterial walls (such as morphological measurements) with conventional risk factors in ML frameworks.SummaryEven though the review covers ML-based system designs for carotid and coronary ultrasonography, the main focus of the review is on CVD/stroke risk scores based on carotid ultrasound. There are two key conclusions from this review: (i) fusion of image-based features with conventional cardiovascular risk factors can lead to more accurate CVD/stroke risk stratification; (ii) the ability to handle multiple sources of information in big data framework using artificial intelligence-based paradigms (such as ML and DL) is likely to be the future in preventive CVD/stroke risk assessment.

[1]  Joao Sanches,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging: Advances and Applications , 2011 .

[2]  Hassan Khan,et al.  Hypertension in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, awareness, and control of hypertension , 2014, Journal of hypertension.

[3]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  A new method for IVUS-based coronary artery disease risk stratification: A link between coronary & carotid ultrasound plaque burdens , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[4]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of psoriasis skin images with HOS, texture and color features: A first comparative study of its kind , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[5]  P. Głuszko,et al.  Cardiovascular risk assessment in rheumatoid arthritis – controversies and the new approach , 2016, Reumatologia.

[6]  Thomas Voigtländer,et al.  Coronary CT Angiography in Managing Atherosclerosis , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[7]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Automated high-performance cIMT measurement techniques using patented AtheroEdge™: A screening and home monitoring system , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[8]  Ajay Gupta,et al.  Web-based accurate measurements of carotid lumen diameter and stenosis severity: An ultrasound-based clinical tool for stroke risk assessment during multicenter clinical trials , 2017, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[9]  Filippo Molinari,et al.  An automated technique for carotid far wall classification using grayscale features and wall thickness variability , 2015, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[10]  Dinesh Kant Kumar,et al.  Development of Health Parameter Model for Risk Prediction of CVD Using SVM , 2016, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[11]  Ayman El-Baz,et al.  Comparative approaches for classification of diabetes mellitus data: Machine learning paradigm , 2017, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[12]  Darvin Yi,et al.  Automated Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy using Deep Learning , 2018, AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science.

[13]  K. Beach Principles of Ultrasonic Imaging and Instrumentation , 2011 .

[14]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11 119 cases and 13 648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study , 2004, The Lancet.

[15]  H. Tunstall-Pedoe,et al.  Estimation of ten-year risk of fatal cardiovascular disease in Europe: the SCORE project. , 2003, European heart journal.

[16]  H. Øygarden Carotid Intima‐Media Thickness and Prediction of Cardiovascular Disease , 2017, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[17]  Jasjit S Suri,et al.  Nonlinear model for the carotid artery disease 10‐year risk prediction by fusing conventional cardiovascular factors to carotid ultrasound image phenotypes: A Japanese diabetes cohort study , 2019, Echocardiography.

[18]  Petia Radeva,et al.  A Convolutional Neural Network for Automatic Characterization of Plaque Composition in Carotid Ultrasound , 2017, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[19]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[20]  Hyun Woong Park,et al.  Carotid plaque is associated with increased cardiac mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. , 2013, International Journal of Cardiology.

[21]  J. Jeng,et al.  Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression and Risk of Cardiovascular Events in a Community in Taiwan , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Irene M Stratton,et al.  Risk factors for myocardial infarction case fatality and stroke case fatality in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 66. , 2004, Diabetes care.

[23]  U Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Automated carotid IMT measurement and its validation in low contrast ultrasound database of 885 patient Indian population epidemiological study: results of AtheroEdge™ Software. , 2012, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[24]  Mohammad Ali Abbasi,et al.  Machine learning to predict rapid progression of carotid atherosclerosis in patients with impaired glucose tolerance , 2016, EURASIP J. Bioinform. Syst. Biol..

[25]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Understanding symptomatology of atherosclerotic plaque by image-based tissue characterization , 2013, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[26]  Steven Shea,et al.  Cardiovascular Event Prediction by Machine Learning: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis , 2017, Circulation research.

[27]  Eric Boerwinkle,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness and presence or absence of plaque improves prediction of coronary heart disease risk: the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[29]  Filippo Molinari,et al.  Intima-media thickness: setting a standard for a completely automated method of ultrasound measurement , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[30]  J. David Spence,et al.  Carotid Plaque Area: A Tool for Targeting and Evaluating Vascular Preventive Therapy , 2002, Stroke.

[31]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Symtosis: A liver ultrasound tissue characterization and risk stratification in optimized deep learning paradigm , 2018, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[32]  A. Nicolaides,et al.  Asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis and cerebrovascular risk stratification. , 2010, Journal of vascular surgery.

[33]  Stephen M Schwartz,et al.  Vascular Remodeling: Hemodynamic and Biochemical Mechanisms Underlying Glagov’s Phenomenon , 2007, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[34]  B. Erickson,et al.  Machine Learning for Medical Imaging. , 2017, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[35]  A. Folsom,et al.  Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, 1987-1993. , 1997, American journal of epidemiology.

[36]  Ambady Ramachandran,et al.  Current scenario of diabetes in India , 2009, Journal of diabetes.

[37]  Petia Radeva,et al.  Wall-based measurement features provides an improved IVUS coronary artery risk assessment when fused with plaque texture-based features during machine learning paradigm , 2017, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[38]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2014, Circulation.

[39]  Richard A. Kronmal,et al.  Distribution and Correlates of Sonographically Detected Carotid Artery Disease in the Cardiovascular Health Study , 1992, Stroke.

[40]  Richard S. Sutton,et al.  Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction , 1998, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[41]  Ioannis A. Kakadiaris,et al.  Machine Learning Outperforms ACC/AHA CVD Risk Calculator in MESA , 2018, Journal of the American Heart Association.

[42]  T. Hortobágyi,et al.  Comparative in vivo and in vitro postmortem ultrasound assessment of intima-media thickness with additional histological analysis in human carotid arteries , 2012 .

[43]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Morphologic TPA (mTPA) and composite risk score for moderate carotid atherosclerotic plaque is strongly associated with HbA1c in diabetes cohort , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[44]  G. Berglund,et al.  Incident coronary events and case fatality in relation to common carotid intima‐media thickness , 2005, Journal of internal medicine.

[45]  Christopher B. Kendall,et al.  Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force. Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[46]  G. D. de Borst,et al.  Plaque Echolucency and the Risk of Ischaemic Stroke in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis Within the First Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST-1). , 2016, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[47]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Atherosclerotic plaque tissue characterization in 2D ultrasound longitudinal carotid scans for automated classification: a paradigm for stroke risk assessment , 2013, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[48]  Gijs van Soest,et al.  Atherosclerotic tissue characterization in vivo by optical coherence tomography attenuation imaging. , 2010, Journal of biomedical optics.

[49]  Naveen Garg,et al.  Comparison of different cardiovascular risk score calculators for cardiovascular risk prediction and guideline recommended statin uses , 2017, Indian heart journal.

[50]  T. Lehtimäki,et al.  Carotid atherosclerosis in chronic renal failure-the central role of increased plaque burden. , 2003, Atherosclerosis.

[51]  A. Laine,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging , 2012, Springer US.

[52]  J. Stein,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness and cardiovascular disease risk prediction. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[53]  J. Hippisley-Cox,et al.  Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study , 2017, British Medical Journal.

[54]  Ayman El-Baz,et al.  Accurate Diabetes Risk Stratification Using Machine Learning: Role of Missing Value and Outliers , 2018, Journal of Medical Systems.

[55]  G. Kitas,et al.  Performance of four current risk algorithms in predicting cardiovascular events in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis , 2014, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[56]  Jihoon G Yoon,et al.  Abstract 194: Machine Learning-Based Model Can Predict Stroke Outcome , 2018 .

[57]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[58]  Samin K. Sharma,et al.  Recent trends in epidemiology of dyslipidemias in India , 2017, Indian heart journal.

[59]  Yuanfang Guan,et al.  Clinical applications of machine learning in cardiovascular disease and its relevance to cardiac imaging. , 2018, European heart journal.

[60]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Plaque Tissue Characterization and Classification in Ultrasound Carotid Scans: A Paradigm for Vascular Feature Amalgamation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[61]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Geometric Total Plaque Area Is an Equally Powerful Phenotype Compared With Carotid Intima-Media Thickness for Stroke Risk Assessment: A Deep Learning Approach , 2018, Journal for Vascular Ultrasound.

[62]  Ayman El-Baz,et al.  Stroke Risk Stratification and its Validation using Ultrasonic Echolucent Carotid Wall Plaque Morphology: A Machine Learning Paradigm , 2017, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[63]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Performance evaluation of 10-year ultrasound image-based stroke/cardiovascular (CV) risk calculator by comparing against ten conventional CV risk calculators: A diabetic study , 2019, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[64]  Luca Saba,et al.  Lung disease stratification using amalgamation of Riesz and Gabor transforms in machine learning framework , 2017, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[65]  G. Gamble,et al.  B-mode ultrasound images of the carotid artery wall: correlation of ultrasound with histological measurements. , 1993, Atherosclerosis.

[66]  M. Motwani,et al.  Machine learning for prediction of all-cause mortality in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a 5-year multicentre prospective registry analysis , 2016, European heart journal.

[67]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[68]  T. Naqvi,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque in cardiovascular risk assessment. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[69]  M. Blaha,et al.  Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring: Is It Time for a Change in Methodology? , 2017, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[70]  Risk assessment chart for death from cardiovascular disease based on a 19-year follow-up study of a Japanese representative population. , 2006, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[71]  Davide Castelvecchi,et al.  Can we open the black box of AI? , 2016, Nature.

[72]  G. M. Allan,et al.  Comparison of cardiovascular disease risk calculators , 2014, Current opinion in lipidology.

[73]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Symptomatic vs. Asymptomatic Plaque Classification in Carotid Ultrasound , 2012, Journal of Medical Systems.

[74]  Achal Kumar Goyal,et al.  Cardiovascular risk prediction: a comparative study of Framingham and quantum neural network based approach , 2016, Patient preference and adherence.

[75]  Shwun‐De Wang,et al.  Segment-specific prevalence of carotid artery plaque and stenosis in middle-aged adults and elders in Taiwan: A community-based study. , 2018, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association = Taiwan yi zhi.

[76]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study , 2010, The Lancet.

[77]  B. Goldstein,et al.  Moving beyond regression techniques in cardiovascular risk prediction: applying machine learning to address analytic challenges , 2016, European heart journal.

[78]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  State-of-the-art review on automated lumen and adventitial border delineation and its measurements in carotid ultrasound , 2018, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[79]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2014, Circulation.

[80]  J. Suri,et al.  What is the correct distance measurement metric when measuring carotid ultrasound intima-media thickness automatically? , 2012, International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology.

[81]  K. Pahan,et al.  Lipid-lowering drugs , 2006, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences CMLS.

[82]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Automated classification of patients with coronary artery disease using grayscale features from left ventricle echocardiographic images , 2013, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[83]  M. Pencina,et al.  General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care: The Framingham Heart Study , 2008, Circulation.

[84]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Carotid-wall intima-media thickness and cardiovascular events. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[85]  Stella S. Daskalopoulou,et al.  MyRisk_Stroke Calculator: A Personalized Stroke Risk Assessment Tool for the General Population , 2014, Journal of clinical neurology.

[86]  Jasjit S Suri,et al.  Asymptomatic Carotid Disease—A New Tool for Assessing Neurological Risk , 2014, Echocardiography.

[87]  Luca Saba,et al.  Intima Media Thickness Variability (IMTV) and its association with cerebrovascular events: a novel marker of carotid therosclerosis? , 2011, Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy.

[88]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Intra- and inter-operator reproducibility of automated cloud-based carotid lumen diameter ultrasound measurement , 2018, Indian heart journal.

[89]  Jasjit S Suri,et al.  A Survey on Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque Tissue Characterization in Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography , 2018, Current Atherosclerosis Reports.

[90]  Yasumichi Arai,et al.  Carotid Plaque Score and Risk of Cardiovascular Mortality in the Oldest Old: Results from the TOOTH Study , 2018, Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis.

[91]  Ajay Gupta,et al.  Accurate lumen diameter measurement in curved vessels in carotid ultrasound: an iterative scale-space and spatial transformation approach , 2016, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[92]  Tom Wilsgaard,et al.  Carotid Plaque Area and Intima-Media Thickness in Prediction of First-Ever Ischemic Stroke: A 10-Year Follow-Up of 6584 Men and Women: The Tromsø Study , 2011, Stroke.

[93]  Pavel V Hushcha,et al.  Machine Learning Approaches in Cardiovascular Imaging , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging.

[94]  Heung-Il Suk,et al.  Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis. , 2017, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[95]  U. Rajendra Acharya,et al.  An Accurate and Generalized Approach to Plaque Characterization in 346 Carotid Ultrasound Scans , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[96]  N. Cook,et al.  Development and validation of improved algorithms for the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in women: the Reynolds Risk Score. , 2007, JAMA.

[97]  Eugenio Picano,et al.  Ultrasound Tissue Characterization of Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaque , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[98]  S. Yusuf,et al.  Global and regional effects of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with acute stroke in 32 countries (INTERSTROKE): a case-control study , 2016, The Lancet.

[99]  Jasjit S Suri,et al.  Echolucency-based phenotype in carotid atherosclerosis disease for risk stratification of diabetes patients. , 2018, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[100]  Bram van Ginneken,et al.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis , 2017, Medical Image Anal..

[101]  Petros Sfikakis,et al.  Rheumatoid Arthritis: Atherosclerosis Imaging and Cardiovascular Risk Assessment Using Machine and Deep Learning–Based Tissue Characterization , 2019, Current Atherosclerosis Reports.

[102]  J. Suri,et al.  Atherosclerotic risk stratification strategy for carotid arteries using texture-based features. , 2012, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[103]  Petia Radeva,et al.  Five multiresolution-based calcium volume measurement techniques from coronary IVUS videos: A comparative approach , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[104]  J. Salonen,et al.  Ultrasonographically assessed carotid morphology and the risk of coronary heart disease. , 1991, Arteriosclerosis and thrombosis : a journal of vascular biology.

[105]  J. Kai,et al.  Can machine-learning improve cardiovascular risk prediction using routine clinical data? , 2017, PloS one.

[106]  Jeny Rajan,et al.  Carotid inter‐adventitial diameter is more strongly related to plaque score than lumen diameter: An automated tool for stroke analysis , 2016, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[107]  Arno W. Hoes,et al.  Common carotid intima-media thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. , 1997, Circulation.

[108]  Yu Guo,et al.  Co-existence of vascular disease in different arterial beds: Peripheral artery disease and carotid artery stenosis--Data from Life Line Screening(®). , 2015, Atherosclerosis.

[109]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  A Recurrent CNN for Automatic Detection and Classification of Coronary Artery Plaque and Stenosis in Coronary CT Angiography , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[110]  Helmuth Steinmetz,et al.  Is carotid intima media thickness useful for individual prediction of cardiovascular risk? Ten-year results from the Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Study (CAPS). , 2010, European heart journal.

[111]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Plaque Echolucency and Stroke Risk in Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2015, Stroke.

[112]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  A novel and robust Bayesian approach for segmentation of psoriasis lesions and its risk stratification , 2017, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[113]  Albert Hofman,et al.  Risk Factors for Progression of Atherosclerosis Measured at Multiple Sites in the Arterial Tree: The Rotterdam Study , 2003, Stroke.

[114]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms , 2001, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[115]  Ajay Gupta,et al.  Plaque Tissue Morphology-Based Stroke Risk Stratification Using Carotid Ultrasound: A Polling-Based PCA Learning Paradigm , 2017, Journal of Medical Systems.

[116]  J. Stein,et al.  Carotid intima-media thickness, plaques, and cardiovascular disease risk: implications for preventive cardiology guidelines. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[117]  U Rajendra Acharya,et al.  Non-invasive automated 3D thyroid lesion classification in ultrasound: a class of ThyroScan™ systems. , 2012, Ultrasonics.

[118]  R. Stevens,et al.  UKPDS 60: Risk of Stroke in Type 2 Diabetes Estimated by the UK Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine , 2002, Stroke.

[119]  Konstantia Zarkogianni,et al.  Comparison of Machine Learning Approaches Toward Assessing the Risk of Developing Cardiovascular Disease as a Long-Term Diabetes Complication , 2018, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[120]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Imaging of coronary atherosclerosis: intravascular ultrasound. , 2010, European heart journal.

[121]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Deep learning strategy for accurate carotid intima-media thickness measurement: An ultrasound study on Japanese diabetic cohort , 2018, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[122]  A. Nicolaides,et al.  Carotid and femoral ultrasound morphology screening and cardiovascular events in low risk subjects: a 10-year follow-up study (the CAFES-CAVE study) , 2001 .

[123]  Ayman El-Baz,et al.  Prostate Tissue Characterization/Classification in 144 Patient Population Using Wavelet and Higher Order Spectra Features from Transrectal Ultrasound Images , 2013, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[124]  PulmonaryRehabilitation 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of CardiovascularRisk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association TaskForce on Practice Guidelines , 2014 .

[125]  J. Suri,et al.  Computed tomography carotid wall plaque characterization using a combination of discrete wavelet transform and texture features: A pilot study , 2013, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[126]  Evaluation of Carotid Plaque Using Ultrasound Imaging , 2016, Journal of cardiovascular ultrasound.

[127]  Konstantina S. Nikita,et al.  A Novel Computerized Tool to Stratify Risk in Carotid Atherosclerosis Using Kinematic Features of the Arterial Wall , 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[128]  Marios S. Pattichis,et al.  Prediction of High-Risk Asymptomatic Carotid Plaques Based on Ultrasonic Image Features , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[129]  G. Cioffi,et al.  Traditional cardiovascular risk factors or inflammation: Which factors accelerate atherosclerosis in arthritis patients? , 2017, International journal of cardiology.

[130]  A. Nicolaides,et al.  Carotid and femoral ultrasound morphology screening and cardiovascular events in low risk subjects: a 10-year follow-up study (the CAFES-CAVE study(1)). , 2002, Atherosclerosis.

[131]  R. Holman,et al.  The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in Type II diabetes (UKPDS 56). , 2001, Clinical science.