Evaluation of the effects of spatial separation and timbral differences on the identifiability of features of concurrent auditory streams
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] G. E. Peterson,et al. Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .
[2] E. C. Cherry. Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .
[3] C. Osgood,et al. The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .
[4] L. N. Solomon. Semantic Approach to the Perception of Complex Sounds , 1958 .
[5] Heinrich Hertz,et al. On the differences between localization and lateralization. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] G. Von Bismarck,et al. Sharpness as an attribute of the timbre of steady sounds , 1974 .
[7] E. Terhardt. On the perception of periodic sound fluctuations (roughness) , 1974 .
[8] P. E. Doak,et al. A subjective rating scale for timbre , 1976 .
[9] B. Moore. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1977 .
[10] Thomas J. Moore. Voice communications jamming research , 1981 .
[11] Michaël Titus Maria Scheffers,et al. Sifting vowels. Auditory pitch analysis and sound segregation. , 1983 .
[12] R. Yin. Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .
[13] B. Moore,et al. Thresholds for the detection of inharmonicity in complex tones. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[14] Harold L. Hawkins,et al. Auditory information processing. , 1986 .
[15] Chris Marshall,et al. Design guidelines , 1987 .
[16] F L Wightman,et al. Headphone simulation of free-field listening. I: Stimulus synthesis. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[17] A. Bregman,et al. The perceptual segregation of simultaneous auditory signals: Pulse train segregation and vowel segregation , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[18] A J Houtsma,et al. Pitch identification of simultaneous diotic and dichotic two-tone complexes. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] William W. Gaver. The SonicFinder: An Interface That Uses Auditory Icons , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[20] Hugo Fastl,et al. Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models , 1990 .
[21] Meera M. Blattner,et al. Communicating and Learning Through Non-speech Audio , 1992 .
[22] J. Culling,et al. Auditory segregation of competing voices: absence of effects of FM or AM coherence. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[23] Stephen McAdams,et al. Recognition of sound sources and events , 1993 .
[24] Charles Darwin,et al. Perceptual separation of concurrent vowels: within and across-formant grouping by F0 , 1993 .
[25] F L Wightman,et al. Localization using nonindividualized head-related transfer functions. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] E. Carterette,et al. Verbal Attributes of Simultaneous Wind Instrument Timbres: II. Adjectives Induced from Piston's "Orchestration" , 1993 .
[27] William W. Gaver. How Do We Hear in the World?: Explorations in Ecological Acoustics , 1993 .
[28] Jean-Marc Jot,et al. Spat~ : A Spatial Processor for Musicians and Sound Engineers , 1995 .
[29] J. Culling,et al. Perceptual separation of concurrent speech sounds: absence of across-frequency grouping by common interaural delay. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Jean-Marc Jot,et al. Digital Signal Processing Issues in the Context of Binaural and Transaural Stereophony , 1995 .
[31] G. Soete,et al. Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: Common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes , 1995, Psychological research.
[32] P. Iverson,et al. Auditory stream segregation by musical timbre: effects of static and dynamic acoustic attributes. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[33] Elena Samoylenko,et al. Systematic Analysis of Verbalizations Produced in Comparing Musical Timbres , 1996 .
[34] Ajm Adrian Houtsma,et al. Pitch and timbre : definition, meaning and use , 1997 .
[35] Christophe Hourdin,et al. A Multidimensional Scaling Analysis of Musical Instruments' Time-Varying Spectra , 1997 .
[36] Hideki Kawahara,et al. Concurrent vowel identification. I. Effects of relative amplitude and F0 difference , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[37] R. W. Hukin,et al. Auditory objects of attention: the role of interaural time differences. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[38] F L Wightman,et al. Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[39] N. Chouard,et al. A semantic differential design especially developed for the evaluation of interior car sounds , 1999 .
[40] V. Ralph Algazi,et al. An adaptable ellipsoidal head model for the interaural time difference , 1999, 1999 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings. ICASSP99 (Cat. No.99CH36258).
[41] J. H. Frey,et al. The Interview: From Structured Questions to Negotiated Text , 2000 .
[42] Vincent Rioux. Sound Quality of Flue Organ Pipe. An Interdisciplinary Study on the Art of Voicing , 2001 .
[43] William L. Martens,et al. Multidimensional Perceptual Scaling of Tone Color Variation in Three Modeled Guitar Amplifiers , 2002 .
[44] D S Brungart,et al. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[45] John G. Neuhoff,et al. PITCH CHANGE, SONIFICATION, AND MUSICAL EXPERTISE: WHICH WAY IS UP? , 2002 .
[46] Lorna M. Brown,et al. BROWSING MODES FOR EXPLORING SONIFIED LINE GRAPHS , 2002 .
[47] B. Kapralos,et al. Auditory Perception and Spatial Auditory Systems4 , 2002 .
[48] Douglas S Brungart,et al. The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[49] G. Kidd,et al. Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[50] Bruce N. Walker,et al. Tick-marks, axes, and labels: The effects of adding context to auditory graphs , 2002 .
[51] André van Schaik,et al. TWO-POINT DISCRIMINATION IN AUDITORY DISPLAYS , 2003 .
[52] Lorna M. Brown,et al. DRAWING BY EAR: INTERPRETING SONIFIED LINE GRAPHS , 2003 .
[53] André van Schaik,et al. 7TWO-POINT DISCRIMINATION IN AUDITORY DISPLAYS , 2003 .
[54] Min-Shik Kim,et al. The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[55] Mark A. Ericson,et al. Factors That Influence Intelligibility in Multitalker Speech Displays , 2004 .
[56] Bruce N. Walker,et al. Individual Differences, Cognitive Abilities, and the Interpretation of Auditory Graphs , 2004, ICAD.
[57] Kenneth I. Joy,et al. Sound graphs: A numerical data analysis method for the blind , 1985, Journal of Medical Systems.
[58] Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al. Selective and Divided Attention: Extracting Information from Simultaneous Sound Sources , 2004, ICAD.
[59] Stephen A. Brewster,et al. Space, the Final Frontearcon: The Identification of Concurrently Presented Earcons in a Synthetic Spatialised Auditory Environment , 2004, ICAD.
[60] Fabio C. Ciardi. sMax: A multimodal toolkit for stock market data sonification , 2004 .
[61] G. Woodman,et al. Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[62] Hani Yehia,et al. Timbre Classification Of A Single Musical Instrument , 2004, ISMIR.
[63] B. Weedon,et al. Echoic Memory In Primitive Auditory Selective Attention , 2004 .
[64] Bruce N. Walker,et al. BRIEF TRAINING FOR PERFORMANCE OF A POINT ESTIMATION SONIFICATION TASK , 2005 .
[65] Frederick J. Gallun,et al. The advantage of knowing where to listen. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[66] S. Jan,et al. Verbal description of musical sound timbre in Czech language and its relation to musicians profession and performance quality , 2005 .
[67] Paul Vickers. WHITHER AND WHEREFORE THE AUDITORY GRAPH? ABSTRACTIONS & ÆSTHETICS IN AUDITORY AND SONIFIED GRAPHS , 2005 .
[68] Lisa M. Mauney. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN INTERPRETING AUDITORY GRAPHS , 2005 .
[69] Hong Jun Song,et al. Time-based Sonification for Information Representation , 2005 .
[70] Diemo Schwarz,et al. Ftm - Complex Data Structures for Max , 2005, ICMC.
[71] Gil Weinberg,et al. Interactive Sonification: Aesthetics, Functionality and Performance , 2006, Leonardo Music Journal.
[72] Densil Cabrera,et al. An interactive approach for teaching information sonification , 2006 .
[73] J. Stepánek. MUSICAL SOUND TIMBRE: VERBAL DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS , 2006 .
[74] David McGookin,et al. ADVANTAGES AND ISSUES WITH CONCURRENT AUDIO PRESENTATION AS PART OF AN AUDITORY DISPLAY , 2006 .
[75] A. Baddeley,et al. The multi-component model of working memory: Explorations in experimental cognitive psychology , 2006, Neuroscience.
[76] Ka Beilharz,et al. Concurrent Auditory Stream Discrimination in Auditory Graphing , 2007 .
[77] Densil Cabrera,et al. Evaluation of Spatial Presentation in Sonification for Identifying Concurrent Audio Streams , 2007 .
[78] Kirsty A. Beilharz,et al. Spatialization and timbre for effective auditory graphing , 2007 .
[79] Kirsty A. Beilharz,et al. Aesthetic and auditory enhancements for multi-stream information sonification , 2008, DIMEA.
[80] A. Bregman. Auditory Scene Analysis , 2008 .
[81] William A. Yost. Auditory, Localization and Scene Perception , 2008 .
[82] B. Shinn-Cunningham. Object-based auditory and visual attention , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[83] Udo Zoelzer,et al. DAFX: Digital Audio Effects , 2011 .
[84] Cécile Colin,et al. The effect of spatial separation on informational masking: Presentation of an original dichotic paradigm , 2012 .