Exploring past and future changes in the ecological footprint for world regions

The Ecological Footprint (EF) has received considerable attention as a useful indicator in the context of sustainable development. So far, it has mostly been applied as a static indicator. Here, we have derived a set of long-term EF scenarios for 17 world regions using the IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the IPCCs SRES scenarios. The scenarios are used to discuss potential trends in EFs in different world regions but also to analyse underlying trends driving changes in the EF. The baseline scenarios show the EF for real land use only (not accounting for CO2) to increase further in the next few decades in most world regions, being driven by population growth, changes in human diets towards more land-intensive products and overall increases in consumption levels. Future crop yield improvements and technology development will partly offset these trends, resulting in decreasing per capita EFs, but increasing total EFs. In the longer term, EF development may strongly diverge on the basis of assumptions made in the different baseline scenarios (from 5.4 Gha at present to 6.0–8.2 Gha in 2050 depending on the scenario). The aggregated EF following the definition of Wackernagel et al. (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99 (2002) 9266–9271) (including virtual land for CO2) increases more strongly, from 12.6 to 20–31 Gha depending on the different scenarios. An alternative scenario was developed to explore whether optimistic assumptions for changes in consumption and production patterns could limit the increase of the global EF, which limited EF increase to 15 Gha in 2050. This scenario still allowed for population growth and strong economic development in low-income regions.

[1]  M. Lenzen,et al.  A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia , 2001 .

[2]  Edward Smeets,et al.  Ecological footprints of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica and the Netherlands , 2000 .

[3]  H. Dowlatabadi Integrated assessment models of climate change: An incomplete overview , 1995 .

[4]  D. P. van Vuuren,et al.  Mitigation scenarios in a world oriented at sustainable development: the role of technology, efficiency and timing , 2001 .

[5]  J. Bergh,et al.  Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’ , 1999 .

[6]  William E. Rees,et al.  Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out , 1992 .

[7]  Jiun-Jiun Ferng,et al.  Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints , 2002 .

[8]  C. Sere,et al.  World livestock production systems. Current status, issues and trends , 1995 .

[9]  Mnv,et al.  The Agricultural Economy Model in IMAGE 2.2 , 2001 .

[10]  J. Bruce,et al.  Climate change, 1995 : economic and social dimensions of climate change , 1997 .

[11]  Gene Bazan Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth , 1997 .

[12]  John Holmberg,et al.  The ecological footprint from a systems perspective of sustainability , 1999 .

[13]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  The land-use projections and resulting emissions in the IPCC SRES scenarios scenarios as simulated by the IMAGE 2.2 model , 2004 .

[14]  R. Leemans,et al.  Global change scenarios of the 21st Century : results from the IMAGE 2.1 model , 1998 .

[15]  P. Gerbens-Leenes,et al.  Consumption patterns and their effects on land required for food , 2002 .

[16]  J. P. Bruce,et al.  Climate change 1995 , 1996 .

[17]  Ian Moffatt,et al.  Measuring sustainability: A time series of alternative indicators for Scotland , 1999 .

[18]  David Pimentel,et al.  Human Population Numbers as a Function of Food Supply , 2001 .

[19]  Helmut Haberl,et al.  How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time: the case of Austria 1926-1995 , 2001 .

[20]  J. Randers,et al.  Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Lothar Funk,et al.  CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis (1997). Challenging Neighbours.; Delsen, Lei and Eelke de Jong (eds.) (1998). The German and Dutch Economies , 1999 .