How does horizontal and vertical navigation influence spatial memory of multifloored environments?

Although a number of studies have been devoted to 2-D navigation, relatively little is known about how the brain encodes and recalls navigation in complex multifloored environments. Previous studies have proposed that humans preferentially memorize buildings by a set of horizontal 2-D representations. Yet this might stem from the fact that environments were also explored by floors. Here, we have investigated the effect of spatial learning on memory of a virtual multifloored building. Two groups of 28 participants watched a computer movie that showed either a route along floors one at a time or travel between floors by simulated lifts, consisting in both cases of a 2-D trajectory in the vertical plane. To test recognition, the participants viewed a camera movement that either replicated a segment of the learning route (familiar segment) or did not (novel segment—i.e., shortcuts). Overall, floor recognition was not reliably superior to column recognition, but learning along a floor route produced a better spatial memory performance than did learning along a column route. Moreover, the participants processed familiar segments more accurately than novel ones, not only after floor learning, but crucially, also after column learning, suggesting a key role of the observation mode on the exploitation of spatial memory.

[1]  Markus Knauff,et al.  Up the down staircase : Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings , 2006 .

[2]  Christoph Hölscher,et al.  Path choice heuristics for navigation related to mental representations of a building , 2007 .

[3]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Systems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Nigel Foreman,et al.  Memory for targets in a multilevel simulated environment: Evidence for vertical asymmetry in spatial memory , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[6]  D. R. Montello,et al.  Integrating Knowledge of Vertically Aligned Large-Scale Spaces , 1993 .

[7]  Dylan M. Jones,et al.  Navigating Buildings in "Desk-Top" Virtual Environments: Experimental Investigations Using Extended Navigational Experience , 1997 .

[8]  T. McNamara,et al.  Orientation and perspective dependence in route and survey learning. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Navigating in a virtual three-dimensional maze: how do egocentric and allocentric reference frames interact? , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  Clark C. Presson,et al.  The coding and transformation of spatial information , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  C. Büchel,et al.  Dissociable Retrosplenial and Hippocampal Contributions to Successful Formation of Survey Representations , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  View dependence in scene recognition after active learning , 1999, Memory & cognition.