Understanding gradient artefacts in simultaneous EEG/fMRI

Implementation of concurrent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG) recording results in the generation of large artefacts that can compromise the quality of EEG data. While much effort has been devoted towards studying the temporal variation of the artefact waveforms produced by time-varying magnetic field gradients, the spatial variation of the artefact voltage across EEG leads has not previously been investigated in any depth. The aim of this work is to develop an improved understanding of the spatial characteristics of the gradient artefacts and the mechanism which underlies their generation. This paper therefore presents physical models of the artefacts produced by the temporally-varying magnetic field gradients required for MRI. Novel analytic expressions for the artefact voltage that account for realistic shifts and rotations of the human head were calculated from electromagnetic theory, assuming a spherical, homogeneous head and longitudinal wirepaths for the EEG cap. These were then corroborated by comparison with numerical simulations using actual EEG wirepaths and with experimental measurements on an agar phantom and human head. The numerical simulations produced accurate reproductions of experimentally measured spatial patterns for both the spherical phantom and human head in a variety of orientations and gradient fields; correlation coefficients were as high as 0.98 for the phantom and 0.95 for the human head. Furthermore, it was determined that artefact voltages for both longitudinal and transverse gradients could be decreased by adjusting the subject's axial position with respect to the gradient coils. The accuracy of the modelled spatial maps along with the ability to model gradient artefacts for any given head orientation are a step towards developing improved artefact correction algorithms that incorporate motion tracking of the subject and selective filtering based on calculated spatial artefact templates, leading to greater fidelity in simultaneous EEG/fMRI data.

[1]  Stefan Debener,et al.  Integration of EEG and fMRI. Editorial. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[2]  D. A. Dunnett Classical Electrodynamics , 2020, Nature.

[3]  R. Fox,et al.  Classical Electrodynamics, 3rd ed. , 1999 .

[4]  Graeme D. Jackson,et al.  Measurement and reduction of motion and ballistocardiogram artefacts from simultaneous EEG and fMRI recordings , 2007, NeuroImage.

[5]  Stephan Wolff,et al.  Spatial filters and automated spike detection based on brain topographies improve sensitivity of EEG–fMRI studies in focal epilepsy , 2007, NeuroImage.

[6]  R Bowtell,et al.  Measurement of electric fields due to time-varying magnetic field gradients using dipole probes , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Stuart Crozier,et al.  Finite difference time domain (FDTD) method for modeling the effect of switched gradients on the human body in MRI , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  D. Cohen,et al.  MEG versus EEG localization test using implanted sources in the human brain , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[9]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Simultaneous EEG source localisation and artifact rejection during concurrent fMRI by means of spatial filtering , 2008, NeuroImage.

[10]  Robert Turner,et al.  A Method for Removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[11]  Andreas Kleinschmidt,et al.  Recent advances in recording electrophysiological data simultaneously with magnetic resonance imaging , 2008, NeuroImage.

[12]  R Bowtell,et al.  Analytic calculations of the E‐fields induced by time‐varying magnetic fields generated by cylindrical gradient coils , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Evaluating gradient artifact correction of EEG data acquired simultaneously with fMRI. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  Satoru Yokoyama,et al.  Electromagnetic source imaging: Backus–Gilbert resolution spread function‐constrained and functional MRI‐guided spatial filtering , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Louis Lemieux,et al.  Identification of EEG Events in the MR Scanner: The Problem of Pulse Artifact and a Method for Its Subtraction , 1998, NeuroImage.

[16]  M. Fuchs,et al.  A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  Andrzej Cichocki,et al.  Removal of ballistocardiogram artifacts from simultaneously recorded EEG and fMRI data using independent component analysis , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  R Bowtell,et al.  Electric fields induced in a spherical volume conductor by temporally varying magnetic field gradients. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  Giorgio Bonmassar,et al.  EEG/(f)MRI measurements at 7 Tesla using a new EEG cap (“InkCap”) , 2006, NeuroImage.