Solution structures of two FHA1-phosphothreonine peptide complexes provide insight into the structural basis of the ligand specificity of FHA1 from yeast Rad53.

Rad53, a yeast checkpoint protein involved in regulating the repair of DNA damage, contains two forkhead-associated domains, FHA1 and FHA2. Previous combinatorial library screening has shown that FHA1 strongly selects peptides containing a pTXXD motif. Subsequent location of this motif within the sequence of Rad9, the target protein, coupled with spectroscopic analysis has led to identification of a tight binding sequence that is likely the binding site of FHA1: (188)SLEV(pT)EADATFVQ(200). We present solution structures of FHA1 in complex with this pT-peptide and with another Rad9-derived pT-peptide that has ca 30-fold lower affinity, (148)KKMTFQ(pT)PTDPLE(160). Both complexes showed intermolecular NOEs predominantly between three peptide residues (pT, +1, and +2 residues) and five FHA1 residues (S82, R83, S85, T106, and N107). Furthermore, the following interactions were implicated on the basis of chemical shift perturbations and structural analysis: the phosphate group of the pT residue with the side-chain amide group of N86 and the guanidino group of R70, and the carboxylate group of Asp (at the +3 position) with the guanidino group of R83. The generated structures revealed a similar binding mode adopted by these two peptides, suggesting that pT and the +3 residue Asp are the major contributors to binding affinity and specificity, while +1 and +2 residues could provide additional fine-tuning. It was also shown that FHA1 does not bind to the corresponding pS-peptides or a related pY-peptide. We suggest that differentiation between pT and pS-peptides by FHA1 can be attributed to hydrophobic interactions between the methyl group of the pT residue and the aliphatic protons of R83, S85, and T106 from FHA1.

[1]  Daniel Durocher,et al.  The FHA domain , 2002, FEBS letters.

[2]  M. Tsai,et al.  Solution structure of the yeast Rad53 FHA2 complexed with a phosphothreonine peptide pTXXL: comparison with the structures of FHA2-pYXL and FHA1-pTXXD complexes. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  M. Tsai,et al.  Structure of the FHA1 domain of yeast Rad53 and identification of binding sites for both FHA1 and its target protein Rad9. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  D. Durocher,et al.  The molecular basis of FHA domain:phosphopeptide binding specificity and implications for phospho-dependent signaling mechanisms. , 2000, Molecular cell.

[5]  M. Tsai,et al.  II. Structure and specificity of the interaction between the FHA2 domain of Rad53 and phosphotyrosyl peptides. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  J. M. Bradshaw,et al.  Role of electrostatic interactions in SH2 domain recognition: salt-dependence of tyrosyl-phosphorylated peptide binding to the tandem SH2 domain of the Syk kinase and the single SH2 domain of the Src kinase. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[7]  T. Pawson,et al.  Protein-protein interactions define specificity in signal transduction. , 2000, Genes & development.

[8]  B. Kemp,et al.  FHA domain boundaries of the Dun1p and Rad53p cell cycle checkpoint kinases , 2000, FEBS letters.

[9]  M. Tsai,et al.  Structure and function of a new phosphopeptide-binding domain containing the FHA2 of Rad53. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  D. Durocher,et al.  The FHA domain is a modular phosphopeptide recognition motif. , 1999, Molecular cell.

[11]  A. Bax,et al.  Protein backbone angle restraints from searching a database for chemical shift and sequence homology , 1999, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[12]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[13]  D. Stern,et al.  Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. , 1998, Science.

[14]  L. Kay,et al.  Correlation between binding and dynamics at SH2 domain interfaces , 1998, Nature Structural Biology.

[15]  K. Constantine,et al.  Localizing the NADP+ binding site on the MurB enzyme by NMR , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[16]  M. Billeter,et al.  MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[17]  P Bucher,et al.  The FHA domain: a putative nuclear signalling domain found in protein kinases and transcription factors. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[18]  S. Schreiber,et al.  Two binding orientations for peptides to the Src SH3 domain: development of a general model for SH3-ligand interactions. , 1995, Science.

[19]  L. Kay,et al.  A pulsed field gradient isotope‐filtered 3D 13C HMQC‐NOESY experiment for extracting intermolecular NOE contacts in molecular complexes , 1994, FEBS letters.

[20]  S. Grzesiek,et al.  The Importance of Not Saturating H2o in Protein NMR : application to Sensitivity Enhancement and Noe Measurements , 1993 .

[21]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[22]  Vladimir Sklenar,et al.  Gradient-Tailored Water Suppression for 1H-15N HSQC Experiments Optimized to Retain Full Sensitivity , 1993 .

[23]  J. Kuriyan,et al.  Binding of a high affinity phosphotyrosyl peptide to the Src SH2 domain: Crystal structures of the complexed and peptide-free forms , 1993, Cell.

[24]  Ad Bax,et al.  Isotope-filtered 2D NMR of a protein-peptide complex: study of a skeletal muscle myosin light chain kinase fragment bound to calmodulin , 1992 .

[25]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  Determination of three‐dimensional structures of proteins from interproton distance data by dynamical simulated annealing from a random array of atoms Circumventing problems associated with folding , 1988, FEBS letters.

[26]  S. Fesik,et al.  Heteronuclear three-dimensional nmr spectroscopy. A strategy for the simplification of homonuclear two-dimensional NMR spectra , 1988 .

[27]  Peer Bork,et al.  SMART: a web-based tool for the study of genetically mobile domains , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  D Cowburn,et al.  Modular peptide recognition domains in eukaryotic signaling. , 1997, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.