Functional magnetic resonance imaging of awake monkeys: some approaches for improving imaging quality.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) at high magnetic field strength can suffer from serious degradation of image quality because of motion and physiological noise, as well as spatial distortions and signal losses due to susceptibility effects. Overcoming such limitations is essential for sensitive detection and reliable interpretation of fMRI data. These issues are particularly problematic in studies of awake animals. As part of our initial efforts to study functional brain activations in awake, behaving monkeys using fMRI at 4.7 T, we have developed acquisition and analysis procedures to improve image quality with encouraging results. We evaluated the influence of two main variables on image quality. First, we show how important the level of behavioral training is for obtaining good data stability and high temporal signal-to-noise ratios. In initial sessions, our typical scan session lasted 1.5 h, partitioned into short (<10 min) runs. During reward periods and breaks between runs, the monkey exhibited movements resulting in considerable image misregistrations. After a few months of extensive behavioral training, we were able to increase the length of individual runs and the total length of each session. The monkey learned to wait until the end of a block for fluid reward, resulting in longer periods of continuous acquisition. Each additional 60 training sessions extended the duration of each session by 60 min, culminating, after about 140 training sessions, in sessions that last about 4 h. As a result, the average translational movement decreased from over 500 μm to less than 80 μm, a displacement close to that observed in anesthetized monkeys scanned in a 7-T horizontal scanner. Another major source of distortion at high fields arises from susceptibility variations. To reduce such artifacts, we used segmented gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequences. Increasing the number of segments significantly decreased susceptibility artifacts and image distortion. Comparisons of images from functional runs using four segments with those using a single-shot EPI sequence revealed a roughly twofold improvement in functional signal-to-noise-ratio and 50% decrease in distortion. These methods enabled reliable detection of neural activation and permitted blood-oxygenation-level-dependent-based mapping of early visual areas in monkeys using a volume coil. In summary, both extensive behavioral training of monkeys and application of segmented gradient-echo EPI sequence improved signal-to-noise ratio and image quality. Understanding the effects these factors have is important for the application of high field imaging methods to the detection of submillimeter functional structures in the awake monkey brain.

[1]  W. Vanduffel,et al.  Visual Field Map Clusters in Macaque Extrastriate Visual Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age , 1991 .

[3]  N Vnek,et al.  Optical imaging of functional domains in the cortex of the awake and behaving monkey. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Olivier P. Faugeras,et al.  The Retinotopic Organization of Primate Dorsal V4 and Surrounding Areas: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study in Awake Monkeys , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  G. Orban,et al.  Extracting 3D from Motion: Differences in Human and Monkey Intraparietal Cortex , 2002, Science.

[6]  D. Ts'o,et al.  Functional organization of primate visual cortex revealed by high resolution optical imaging. , 1990, Science.

[7]  Jon K. Grossmann,et al.  Developing functional magnetic resonance imaging techniques for alert macaque monkeys. , 2006, Methods.

[8]  T. Albright,et al.  fMRI of Monkey Visual Cortex , 1998, Neuron.

[9]  John C Gore,et al.  High-Resolution Maps of Real and Illusory Tactile Activation in Primary Somatosensory Cortex in Individual Monkeys with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Optical Imaging , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Functional imaging of the monkey brain , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  A. Anderson,et al.  Respiratory effects in human functional magnetic resonance imaging due to bulk susceptibility changes. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Ultra High-Resolution fMRI in Monkeys with Implanted RF Coils , 2002, Neuron.

[13]  A. Roe,et al.  Functional organization for color and orientation in macaque V4 , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Yasushi Miyashita,et al.  MRI-based localization of electrophysiological recording sites within the cerebral cortex at single-voxel accuracy , 2007, Nature Methods.

[15]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Functional MRI of Macaque Monkeys Performing a Cognitive Set-Shifting Task , 2002, Science.

[16]  Amir Shmuel,et al.  Robust controlled functional MRI in alert monkeys at high magnetic field: Effects of jaw and body movements , 2007, NeuroImage.

[17]  Lawrence L. Wald,et al.  Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters , 2005, NeuroImage.

[18]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Robust detection of ocular dominance columns in humans using Hahn Spin Echo BOLD functional MRI at 7 Tesla , 2007, NeuroImage.

[19]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Lack of long-term cortical reorganization after macaque retinal lesions , 2005, Nature.

[20]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Spatial Specificity of BOLD versus Cerebral Blood Volume fMRI for Mapping Cortical Organization , 2007, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[21]  J C Gore,et al.  A model for susceptibility artefacts from respiration in functional echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Li Sun,et al.  Newcastle University E-prints Citation for Published Item: Further Information on Publisher Website: Publishers Copyright Statement: Use Policy: Characterisation of the Bold Response Time Course at Different Levels of the Auditory Pathway in Non-human Primates , 2022 .

[23]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Bottom-Up Dependent Gating of Frontal Signals in Early Visual Cortex , 2008, Science.

[24]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  Nikos K Logothetis,et al.  Laminar specificity in monkey V1 using high-resolution SE-fMRI. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[26]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  fMRI of the temporal lobe of the awake monkey at 7 T , 2008, NeuroImage.

[27]  R. Andersen,et al.  Space representation for eye movements is more contralateral in monkeys than in humans , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Sabine Kastner,et al.  Methods for functional magnetic resonance imaging in normal and lesioned behaving monkeys , 2005, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  Roger B. H. Tootell,et al.  Does Retinotopy Influence Cortical Folding in Primate Visual Cortex? , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  C. Gross,et al.  Visual topography of V2 in the macaque , 1981, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[31]  G. Glover,et al.  Physiological noise in oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Blindsight depends on the lateral geniculate nucleus , 2010, Nature.

[33]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A Cortical Region Consisting Entirely of Face-Selective Cells , 2006, Science.

[34]  Kevin Whittingstall,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of awake behaving macaques. , 2010, Methods.

[35]  G. Orban,et al.  Visual Motion Processing Investigated Using Contrast Agent-Enhanced fMRI in Awake Behaving Monkeys , 2001, Neuron.

[36]  Hisashi Tanigawa,et al.  A Motion Direction Map in Macaque V2 , 2010, Neuron.

[37]  G. Glover,et al.  Neuroimaging at 1.5 T and 3.0 T: Comparison of oxygenation‐sensitive magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  Timothy D. Griffiths,et al.  Orthogonal representation of sound dimensions in the primate midbrain , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  G. Mckinnon Ultrafast interleaved gradient‐echo‐planar imaging on a standard scanner , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[40]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Brain Mapping: The Methods , 2002 .

[41]  Kristen A. Ford,et al.  BOLD fMRI activation for anti-saccades in nonhuman primates , 2009, NeuroImage.

[42]  Amir Shmuel,et al.  Functional MR imaging in the awake monkey: effects of motion on dynamic off-resonance and processing strategies. , 2007, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[43]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  The adaptive bases algorithm for intensity-based nonrigid image registration , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[44]  R A Andersen,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging in macaque cortex , 1998, Neuroreport.

[45]  N. Logothetis,et al.  A combined MRI and histology atlas of the rhesus monkey brain in stereotaxic coordinates , 2007 .

[46]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Macaque Monkeys Performing Visually Guided Saccade Tasks Comparison of Cortical Eye Fields with Humans , 2004, Neuron.

[47]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Human Ocular Dominance Columns as Revealed by High-Field Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, Neuron.

[48]  Margaret S. Livingstone,et al.  Noninvasive Functional Mri in Alert Monkeys , 2022 .

[49]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Patches with Links: A Unified System for Processing Faces in the Macaque Temporal Lobe , 2008, Science.

[50]  Li Min Chen,et al.  Optical Imaging of SI Topography in Anesthetized and Awake Squirrel Monkeys , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.