A PROBABILISTIC APPROACH FOR EXTRACTING DESIGN PREFERENCES FROM DESIGN TEAM DISCUSSION

During the formative stage of the design cycle, teams engage in a variety of tasks to arrive at a design, including selecting among design alternatives. A key notion in design alternative selection is that of "preference" in which a designer assigns priorities to a set of design choices. This paper presents a preliminary approach for extracting a projection of aggregated design team preferences from design team discussion. This approach further takes into consideration how the design preferences of a team can evolve over time as the team changes its priorities based on new design information. Two initial models are given for representing the most probable and preferred design alternative from the transcriptions of design team discussion, and for predicting how preferences might change from one time interval to the next. These models are applied to an illustrative, real-world case example.

[1]  Naonori Ueda,et al.  Deterministic annealing EM algorithm , 1998, Neural Networks.

[2]  Jeff A. Bilmes,et al.  A gentle tutorial of the em algorithm and its application to parameter estimation for Gaussian mixture and hidden Markov models , 1998 .

[3]  R. Fisher,et al.  On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics , 1922 .

[4]  Erik K. Antonsson,et al.  Trade-off strategies in engineering design , 1991 .

[5]  Yan Jin,et al.  Fuzzy Preference Evaluation for Hierarchical Co-Evolutionary Design Concept Generation , 2006, DAC 2006.

[6]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Computations with Imprecise Parameters in Engineering Design: Background and Theory , 1989 .

[7]  Jonathan Barzilai,et al.  On the foundations of measurement , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. e-Systems and e-Man for Cybernetics in Cyberspace (Cat.No.01CH37236).

[8]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Linking design process to customer satisfaction through virtual design of experiments , 2006 .

[9]  新家 健精 Ralph L.Keeney,Howard Raiffa:Decisions with Multiple Objectives Preferences and Value Tradeoffs,1976 , 1981 .

[10]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis , 1989 .

[11]  K. Arrow,et al.  Social Choice and Multicriterion Decision-Making , 1986 .

[12]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  SMEM Algorithm for Mixture Models , 1998, Neural Computation.

[13]  George A. Miller,et al.  Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database , 1990 .

[14]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[15]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[16]  R. Keeney A Group Preference Axiomatization with Cardinal Utility , 1976 .

[17]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[18]  Andy Dong,et al.  The latent semantic approach to studying design team communication , 2005 .

[19]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Group decision making using the analytic hierarchy process , 1993 .

[20]  Andy Dong,et al.  Concept formation as knowledge accumulation: A computational linguistics study , 2006, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[21]  J. Neumann,et al.  Theory of games and economic behavior , 1945, 100 Years of Math Milestones.

[22]  Bernard Mérialdo,et al.  Using category-based collaborative filtering in the Active WebMuseum , 2000, 2000 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo. ICME2000. Proceedings. Latest Advances in the Fast Changing World of Multimedia (Cat. No.00TH8532).

[23]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[24]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Text analysis for constructing design representations , 1997, Artif. Intell. Eng..

[25]  Andy Dong,et al.  HOW AMI DOING? THE LANGUAGE OF APPRAISAL IN DESIGN , 2006 .

[26]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  Multiattribute optimal design of structural dynamic systems , 1992 .

[27]  Jay B. Brockman Evaluation of student design processes , 1996, Technology-Based Re-Engineering Engineering Education Proceedings of Frontiers in Education FIE'96 26th Annual Conference.

[28]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  TIME VARIATION OF DESIGN “STORY TELLING” IN ENGINEERING DESIGN TEAMS , 2003 .

[29]  J. Neumann,et al.  The Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour , 1944 .

[30]  Andy Dong,et al.  Exploring the Relationship Between Lexical Behavior and Concept Formation in Design Conversations , 2005 .

[31]  Maria C. Yang,et al.  A TEXT-BASED ANALYSIS APPROACH TO REPRESENTING THE DESIGN SELECTION PROCESS , 2007 .

[32]  Jaap Van Brakel,et al.  Foundations of measurement , 1983 .

[33]  T. Saaty Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory With the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2000 .

[34]  J. Wang (International Journal of Production Research, 35(4):995-1010)A Fuzzy Outranking Method for Conceptual Design Evaluation , 1997 .

[35]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  A Decision Support Formulation for Design Teams: A Study in Preference Aggregation and Handling Unequal Group Members , 2005, DAC 2005.

[36]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Space Mission Analysis and Design , 1992 .

[37]  Deborah L Thurston,et al.  A formal method for subjective design evaluation with multiple attributes , 1991 .

[38]  R. Komanduri,et al.  Knowledge-based expert systems for manufacturing , 1987 .