Students’ Understanding Is Enhanced Through Molecular Modeling

Integration of molecular modeling into General Chemistry lab encourages students to dually process molecular concepts both verbally and pictorially. When students are tested utilizing questions not previously encountered the dual processing of information can contribute to a transfer to knowledge. General Chemistry students utilized molecular modeling in lab and a comparison of a treatment and nontreatment group during two semesters is presented for a pretest, posttest, and on semester exam questions. The treatment group tested significantly higher than the nontreatment group on both the posttest and semester exam questions related to molecular concepts illustrating that there was a transfer of knowledge.

[1]  M. Wittrock.  Generative Processes of Comprehension , 1989 .

[2]  Alex H. Johnstone,et al.  TEACHING OF CHEMISTRY - LOGICAL OR PSYCHOLOGICAL? , 2000 .

[3]  David P. Maloney,et al.  An exploratory, classroom‐based investigation of students' difficulties with subscripts in chemical formulas , 1992 .

[4]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Differential effects on the achievement of males and females of teaching the particulate nature of chemistry , 2002 .

[5]  L. Plesniak,et al.  Some Like It Cold: A Computer-Based Laboratory Introduction to Sequence and Tertiary Structure Comparison of Cold-Adapted Lactate Dehydrogenases Using Bioinformatics Tools , 2003 .

[6]  A. Paivio.  Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .

[7]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Use of the particle nature of matter in developing conceptual understanding , 1993 .

[8]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[9]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  COMPUTERIZED MOLECULAR MODELING - THE NEW TECHNOLOGY FOR ENHANCING MODEL PERCEPTION AMONG CHEMISTRY EDUCATORS AND LEARNERS , 2000 .

[10]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Students' understanding of the role of scientific models in learning science , 2002 .

[11]  Hans-Jürgen Schmidt.  Students' misconceptions—Looking for a pattern , 1997 .

[12]  A. Johnstone.  Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem , 1991 .

[13]  Ned H. Martin.  INTEGRATION OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY INTO THE CHEMISTRY CURRICULUM , 1998 .

[14]  A. Paivio,et al.  Dual coding theory and education , 1991 .

[15]  Yehudit Judy Dori,et al.  Virtual and Physical Molecular Modeling: Fostering Model Perception and Spatial Understanding , 2001, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[16]  Juan Moran,et al.  Molecular Modeling and Visualization Tools in Science Education i , 2003 .

[17]  Julie B. Ealy,et al.  A Student Evaluation of Molecular Modeling in First Year College Chemistry , 1999 .

[18]  James R. Cox,et al.  Integrating Computational Chemistry into a Project-Oriented Biochemistry Laboratory Experience: A New Twist on the Lysozyme Experiment , 2001 .

[19]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[20]  Martin B. Jones.  Molecular Modeling in the Undergraduate Chemistry Curriculum , 2001 .

[21]  James C. Dabrowiak,et al.  A Molecular Modeling Program for Teaching Structural Biochemistry , 2000 .

[22]  A. Shusterman,et al.  Teaching Chemistry with Electron Density Models , 1997 .

[23]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom , 2001 .