Different values, different skills? A comparison of essay writing by students from arts and science backgrounds

This article reports the findings of a 3 year research project which investigated disciplinary variation in student writing. Within an Open University course in the history of science, students from an arts background were found to achieve significantly higher grades than those from a science background. Textual and interview data suggest that differences in their essay writing may be related to differences in disciplinary culture and epistemology. The results thus support the hypothesis that students' writing is shaped by their disciplinary background, and call into question the extent to which communication skills are transferable across disciplinary contexts.

[1]  S. Barker,et al.  Epistemological Beliefs Across Domains Using Biglan's Classification of Academic Disciplines , 2003 .

[2]  Roger Lindsay,et al.  Different Disciplines Require Different Motivations for Student Success , 2002 .

[3]  Tony Becher,et al.  Teaching and Learning in their Disciplinary Contexts: A conceptual analysis , 2002 .

[4]  B. Cronin.  Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing , 2002, J. Documentation.

[5]  R. Neumann.  Disciplinary Differences and University Teaching , 2001 .

[6]  T. Lillis.  Student Writing: Access, Regulation, Desire , 2001 .

[7]  T. Lillis,et al.  Student Writing in Higher Education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns , 2001 .

[8]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  The influence of history of science courses on students' views of nature of science , 2000 .

[9]  A. Mayer,et al.  Setting up a discipline: conflicting agendas of the Cambridge History of Science Committee, 1936-1950. , 2000, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[10]  Robert Moore.  The (Re)Organisation of Knowledge and Assessment for a Learning Society: The constraints on interdisciplinarity , 2000 .

[11]  E. Robinson,et al.  Individual differences in undergraduate essay-writing strategies: A longitudinal study , 2000 .

[12]  Kate Chanock,et al.  Comments on Essays: Do students understand what tutors write? , 2000 .

[13]  K. Hyland,et al.  Academic Attribution: Citation and the Construction of Disciplinary Knowledge. , 1999 .

[14]  D. Newton,et al.  Enculturation and Understanding: some differences between sixth formers’ and graduates’ conceptions of understanding in History and Science , 1998 .

[15]  Michael B. Paulsen,et al.  DOMAIN DIFFERENCES IN THE EPISTEMOLOGICAL BELIEFS OF COLLEGE STUDENTS , 1998 .

[16]  Susan Peck MacDonald,et al.  Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences , 1996 .

[17]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Approaches to Studying and Perceptions of the Learning Environment Across Disciplines. , 1995 .

[18]  William J. Vande Kopple,et al.  Some Characteristics and Functions of Grammatical Subjects in Scientific Discourse , 1994 .

[19]  Christina Haas,et al.  Learning to Read Biology , 1994 .

[20]  A. Megill,et al.  Recounting the Past: “Description,” Explanation, and Narrative in Historiography , 1989 .

[21]  Greg Myers,et al.  The Social Construction of Two Biologists' Proposals , 1985 .

[22]  Kristine Hansen,et al.  Learning to Write in the Social Sciences , 1985 .

[23]  C. Bazerman.  What Written Knowledge Does: Three Examples of Academic Discourse , 1981 .

[24]  A. Biglan.  The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. , 1973 .

[25]  D. Shapere.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , 1964 .

[26]  Sarah North,et al.  theme use in undergraduate essays in the history of science , 2003 .

[27]  M. Charles.  ‘This mystery…’: a corpus-based study of the use of nouns to construct stance in theses from two contrasting disciplines , 2003 .

[28]  D. Russell,et al.  'Big Picture People Rarely Become Historians': Genre Systems and the Contradictions of General Education , 2003 .

[29]  Kate Cadman,et al.  Writing and Identity. The Discoursal Construction of Identity in Academic Writing: Roz Ivanic. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1998. ISBN: 90 272 1798 X (Eur) /1-556 19-323-8 (US) , 2002 .

[30]  Mary Lea,et al.  Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach , 1998 .

[31]  D. Newton,et al.  Learning and conceptions of understanding in history and science: Lecturers and new graduates compared , 1998 .

[32]  R. Ivanič.  Writing and identity , 1998 .

[33]  G. Myers.  Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences , 1997 .

[34]  Jens-Christian Smeby.  Disciplinary differences in university teaching , 1996 .

[35]  Tony Becher.  The significance of disciplinary differences , 1994 .

[36]  C. Geisler.  Academic Literacy and the Nature of Expertise: Reading, Writing and Knowing in Academic Philosophy , 1994 .

[37]  N. Fairclough.  Discourse and social change , 1992 .

[38]  Irving J. Spitzberg,et al.  Quality and access in higher education : comparing Britain and the United States , 1991 .

[39]  Tom Schuller,et al.  The Future of Higher Education. , 1991 .

[40]  P. Fries.  Patterns of information in initial position in English , 1990 .

[41]  Tony Becher.  Academic Tribes And Territories , 1989 .

[42]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Variation across speech and writing: Methodology , 1988 .

[43]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .