Impact categories for life cycle assessment research of seafood production systems: Review and prospectus

Goal, Scope and BackgroundIn face of continued declines in global fisheries landings and concurrent rapid aquaculture development, the sustainability of seafood production is of increasing concern. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) offers a convenient means of quantifying the impacts associated with many of the energetic and material inputs and outputs in these industries. However, the relevant but limited suite of impact categories currently used in most LCA research fails to capture a number of important environmental and social burdens unique to fisheries and aquaculture. This article reviews the impact categories used in published LCA research of seafood production to date, reports on a number of methodological innovations, and discusses the challenges to and opportunities for further impact category developments.Main FeaturesThe range of environmental and socio-economic impacts associated with fisheries and aquaculture production are introduced, and both the commonly used and innovative impact categories employed in published LCA research of seafood production are discussed. Methodological innovations reported in agricultural LCAs are also reviewed for possible applications to seafood LCA research. Challenges and options for including additional environmental and socioeconomic impact categories are explored.ResultsA review of published LCA research in fisheries and aquaculture indicates the frequent use of traditional environmental impact categories as well as a number of interesting departures from the standard suite of categories employed in LCA studies in other sectors. Notable examples include the modeling of benthic impacts, by-catch, emissions from anti-fouling paints, and the use of Net Primary Productivity appropriation to characterize biotic resource use. Socio-economic impacts have not been quantified, nor does a generally accepted methodology for their consideration exist. However, a number of potential frameworks for the integration of such impacts into LCA have been proposed.DiscussionLCA analyses of fisheries and aquaculture call attention to an important range of environmental interactions that are usually not considered in discussions of sustainability in the seafood sector. These include energy use, biotic resource use, and the toxicity of anti-fouling paints. However, certain important impacts are also currently overlooked in such research. While prospects clearly exist for improving and expanding on recent additions to environmental impact categories, the nature of the LCA framework may preclude treatment of some of these impacts. Socio-economic impact categories have only been described in a qualitative manner. Despite a number of challenges, significant opportunities exist to quantify several important socio-economic impacts.ConclusionThe limited but increasing volume of LCA research of industrial fisheries and aquaculture indicates a growing interest in the use of LCA methodology to understand and improve the sustainability performance of seafood production systems. Recent impact category innovations, and the potential for further impact category developments that account for several of the unique interactions characteristic of fisheries and aquaculture will significantly improve the usefulness of LCA in this context, although quantitative analysis of certain types of impacts may remain beyond the scope of the LCA framework. The desirability of incorporating socio-economic impacts is clear, but such integration will require considerable methodological development.Recommendations and PerspectivesWhile the quantity of published LCA research for seafood production systems is clearly increasing, the influence this research will have on the ground remains to be seen. In part, this will depend on the ability of LCA researchers to advance methodological innovations that enable consideration of a broader range of impacts specific to seafood production. It will also depend on the ability of researchers to communicate with a broader audience than the currently narrow LCA community.

[1]  Karin Andersson,et al.  LCA of food products and production systems , 2000 .

[2]  Christopher W. Glass,et al.  CONSERVATION OF FISH STOCKS THROUGH BYCATCH REDUCTION: A REVIEW , 2000 .

[3]  Korie A. Johnson A Review of National and International Literature on the Effects of fishing on Benthic Habitats , 2002 .

[4]  D. L. Alverson A global assessment of fisheries bycatch and discards , 1994 .

[5]  Mikkel Thrane,et al.  LCA of Danish Fish Products. New methods and insights (9 pp) , 2006 .

[6]  A. Hospido,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of Spanish tuna fisheries , 2005 .

[7]  F. Comerón,et al.  ROSAT X-ray detection of a young brown dwarf in the chamaeleon I dark cloud , 1998, Science.

[8]  Pamela A. Matson,et al.  HUMAN APPROPRIATION OF THE PRODUCTS OF PHOTOSYNTHESIS , 1986 .

[9]  A. A. Jensen Life cycle assessment (LCA) : a guide to approaches, experiences and information sources , 1998 .

[10]  D. Pauly,et al.  Fueling Global Fishing Fleets , 2005, Ambio.

[11]  G. Haas,et al.  Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment , 2001 .

[12]  F. Páez-Osuna,et al.  The environmental impact of shrimp aquaculture: a global perspective. , 2001, Environmental pollution.

[13]  Steven J. Schwager,et al.  Global Assessment of Organic Contaminants in Farmed Salmon , 2004, Science.

[14]  Johanna J. Heymans,et al.  Hundred‐year decline of North Atlantic predatory fishes , 2003 .

[15]  Per-Anders Hansson,et al.  Emissions from fuel combustion in Swedish cod fishery , 2003 .

[16]  B. Mattsson,et al.  Life Cycle assessment of frozen cod fillets including fishery-specific environmental impacts , 2003 .

[17]  Carl Folke,et al.  Energy economy of salmon aquaculture in the Baltic sea , 1988 .

[18]  Peter Tyedmers,et al.  The Future for Fisheries , 2003, Science.

[19]  Frank Brentrup,et al.  Life Cycle Impact assessment of land use based on the hemeroby concept , 2002 .

[20]  G. Keoleian,et al.  Assessing the sustainability of the US food system: a life cycle perspective , 2003 .

[21]  C. Cleveland,et al.  Resource scarcity, energy use and environmental impact: A case study of the New Bedford, Massachusetts, USA, fisheries , 1993 .

[22]  H. Mooney,et al.  Nature's Subsidies to Shrimp and Salmon Farming , 1998, Science.

[23]  Karin Andersson,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of food products and production systems , 1994 .

[24]  Tim Gray,et al.  Discards in North Sea fisheries: causes, consequences and solutions , 2005 .

[25]  Sara M. Maxwell,et al.  Shifting gears: assessing collateral impacts of fishing methods in US waters , 2003 .

[26]  Hisahiko Watanabe,et al.  Energy input in marine fisheries of Japan , 1989 .

[27]  E. Verspoor,et al.  Interactions between wild and introduced Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) , 1998 .

[28]  Mikkel Thrane,et al.  Energy Consumption in the Danish Fishery: Identification of Key Factors , 2004 .

[29]  Roland Clift,et al.  Potentials and Limitations of Life Cycle Assessment in Setting Ecolabelling Criteria: A Case Study of Thai Shrimp Aquaculture Product (5 pp) , 2006 .

[30]  Stephen J. Hall,et al.  Managing by-catch and discards: how much progress are we making and how can we do better? , 2005 .

[31]  Rattanawan Tam Mungkung Shrimp aquaculture in Thailand : application of life cycle assessment to support sustainable development , 2005 .

[32]  J. W. Owens Water Resources in Life‐Cycle Impact Assessment: Considerations in Choosing Category Indicators , 2001 .

[33]  I. Fleming,et al.  Lifetime success and interactions of farm salmon invading a native population , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  Peter Tyedmers,et al.  Fisheries and Energy Use , 2004 .

[35]  Carl Folke,et al.  Analysis Managing aquaculture for sustainability in tropical Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe , 1996 .

[36]  Helge Reinertsen,et al.  Sustainable fish farming : proceedings of the First International Symposium on Sustainable Fish Farming, Oslo, Norway, 28-31 August, 1994 , 1995 .

[37]  M. Hauschild,et al.  A Framework for Social Life Cycle Impact Assessment (10 pp) , 2006 .

[38]  T. Pitcher,et al.  Towards sustainability in world fisheries , 2002, Nature.

[39]  Roland Clift,et al.  Social and environmental life cycle assessment (SELCA) , 1996 .

[40]  G Finnveden,et al.  Life cycle assessment part 2: current impact assessment practice. , 2004, Environment international.

[41]  J. Derraik The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. , 2002, Marine pollution bulletin.

[42]  Roland Clift,et al.  A methodology for assessing soil quantity and quality in life cycle assessment , 2000 .

[43]  M. Burke,et al.  AQUACULTURE AND OCEAN RESOURCES: Raising Tigers of the Sea , 2005 .

[44]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Best available practice regarding impact categories and category indicators in life cycle impact assessment , 1999 .

[45]  S. Einum,et al.  Genetic divergence and interactions in the wild among native, farmed and hybrid Atlantic salmon , 1997 .

[46]  Les Watling,et al.  Environmental impact of salmon net-pen culture on marine benthic communities in Maine: A case study , 1995 .

[47]  C. Folke,et al.  The Costs of Eutrophication from Salmon Farming: Implications for Policy , 1994 .

[48]  D. Pauly,et al.  Primary production required to sustain global fisheries , 1995, Nature.

[49]  Carl Folke,et al.  Ecological limitations and appropriation of ecosystem support by shrimp farming in Colombia , 1994 .

[50]  Friederike Ziegler,et al.  Spatial distribution of fishing effort in relation to seafloor habitats in the Kattegat, a GIS analysis , 2007 .

[51]  Peter Tyedmers,et al.  Salmon and sustainability : the biophysical cost of producing salmon through the commercial salmon fishery and the intensive salmon culture industry , 2000 .

[52]  C. Folke,et al.  THE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT CONCEPT FOR SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD PRODUCTION: A REVIEW , 1998 .

[53]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Life cycle assessment An operational guide to the ISO standards , 2001 .

[54]  H. Mooney,et al.  Effect of aquaculture on world fish supplies , 2000, Nature.

[55]  K. Bjorndal,et al.  Historical Overfishing and the Recent Collapse of Coastal Ecosystems , 2001, Science.

[56]  H. V. D. van der Werf,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment of Salmonid Feeds Using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) , 2004, Ambio.

[57]  B. Worm,et al.  Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities , 2003, Nature.

[58]  Andrew A. Rosenberg,et al.  Wasted fishery resources: discarded by‐catch in the USA , 2005 .

[59]  John P. Volpe,et al.  Fish Farms and Sea Lice Infestations of Wild Juvenile Salmon in the Broughton Archipelago—A Rebuttal to Brooks (2005) , 2006 .

[60]  Simon Northridge,et al.  Bycatch of Marine Mammals in U.S. and Global Fisheries , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[61]  Otto Andersen,et al.  Transport of fish from Norway: energy analysis using industrial ecology as the framework , 2002 .

[62]  James L. Anderson,et al.  Aquaculture and international trade , 1997 .

[63]  Mikkel Thrane,et al.  Environmental impacts from Danish fish products: hot spots and environmental policies , 2004 .